February 27, 2002, 18:03
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 21:06
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Athens of the North (Edinburgh)
Posts: 377
|
Firaxis, shouldn't coastal squares give 2 food, and with harbor 3?
Um, correct me if you think i'm wrong, but wouldn't coastal squares be better giving a food of 2 instead of 1.
Therefore when a harbor is built, this would increase to 3?
It seems at the moment that coastal cities really suffer when compared to inland cities!?
I'm sure in Civ2 coastal cities were really useful...??
It would also help with the construction of navy and might make them a more viable option for both human and AI?!
Last edited by =DrJambo=; February 27, 2002 at 18:13.
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2002, 20:20
|
#2
|
Warlord
Local Time: 13:06
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, US
Posts: 114
|
I disagree. First of all if the tile has a fish then you're getting that anyway, which is better because otherwise, what are your people eating? Also giving every coastal city what is effectively a grassland with wheat is a little unbalancing.
What I wish they would do is allow us to transfer food between our cities. This was an excellent feature in civ2 and why they took it out of civ3 is beyond me. I can't count how many times I've seen an excellent city site with high production potential but knew building a city there was ridiculous because I would never be able to get enough surplus food to mine the surrounding areas.
Just something else to chalk up to poor design and rushed production -sigh-
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2002, 20:32
|
#3
|
Prince
Local Time: 21:06
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Athens of the North (Edinburgh)
Posts: 377
|
yup, good points there, bringing back the food trade would be certainly be a welcome addition
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2002, 05:31
|
#4
|
Deity
Local Time: 14:06
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 17,354
|
I don't think that is necessary
but what could be in order is a higher distribution of sea resources. They don't seem to occur as often as they did in civ2. Yet land resources are everywhere.
so more fishy resources would be nice.
__________________
Focus, discipline
Barack Obama- the antichrist
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2002, 06:37
|
#5
|
Warlord
Local Time: 21:06
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 120
|
Coastal Cities aren't as productive as they could be. The sea provides minerals and fish oil and maybe other fish parts can be used as a ressource. I don't see a food problem, though. Without a harbor there should be no food at all from the sea.
|
|
|
|
March 6, 2002, 15:54
|
#6
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 15:06
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 38
|
Most fishing villages don't have "harbors" they have docks which are not the same thing. Enough fish to feed the local populace (up to city size maybe) could easily be gotten from trolling the coast with small boats. The Harbor would increase trade, and maybe production; food perhaps by allowing larger fishing trawlers to dock, but food/shields/trade I think would best be 2/1/1 for start up coastal squares.
__________________
The other guys are always barbarians
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:06.
|
|