November 14, 2000, 14:54
|
#31
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 21:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ( o Y o )
Posts: 5,048
|
Spammer, me?
They were just two points i had thought of.
------------------
Dear earthlings, dont panic.
Occupation will be painless.
There is no way to avoid it.
|
|
|
|
|
November 15, 2000, 10:49
|
#32
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 404
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dom Pedro II on 11-10-2000 02:52 AM
I say eliminate oceans as we now know them. The reason is that if you drain away the oceans, they are just depressions in the earth's surface.
|
Not correct. Oceans are not mearly depressions in the earths surface. Rather, the continents are bumps over the ocean surface. The rock that the ocean (not including continental shelf which is just continent underwater) is different to continental rock. I don't know if this will affect anything but there it is.
------------------
- Biddles
"Now that our life-support systems are utilising the new Windows 2027 OS, we don't have to worry about anythi......."
Mars Colonizer Mission
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 17, 2000, 10:32
|
#33
|
|
Guest
|
bumping
I don't think that everyone has seen it yet 
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 20, 2000, 14:33
|
#34
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nampa, ID, USA
Posts: 401
|
It's probably going to end up after about a month, this thread has over 100 posts, most of which are about you bumping and me retorting you because this thread is all but exhausted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 20, 2000, 23:08
|
#35
|
Local Time: 00:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Deity of Lists
Posts: 11,873
|
Yes Andz, this is exactly why some people were angry at you; bumping every two weeks is good, but every day, or other day, or third day- no... that's a post count reduction offence. See the rules, section XXX I believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 21, 2000, 01:14
|
#36
|
|
Guest
|
bump
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 21, 2000, 11:48
|
#37
|
|
Guest
|
the thread had disappeared on page 2 so I think it waa no foul to bump it. don't blame me for the amount of posts that are made here. do you by chance see the connection between one thread descending when anotherone's bumped? 
also, it's the first thread that deals with a terrain model, though noone replies to it. why doesn't anyone want to make proposals, eh?
I should apparently have asked someone else to open this thread, my beloved fellows!
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 21, 2000, 12:21
|
#38
|
|
Settler
Local Time: 01:41
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Austria
Posts: 6
|
I agree with your suggestions! I like them very much. IMO the terrain model as we know it from SMAC was nearly perfect, but, however, it has to be adapted from Alpha Centauri to Earth...
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 21, 2000, 12:34
|
#39
|
|
Guest
|
Continental europeans UNITE!!! 
yes, the SMAC model made sense. that's why I adepted the elevation idea from it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 28, 2000, 11:54
|
#40
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 21:41
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ( o Y o )
Posts: 5,048
|
and we need to make the AI be capable of terraforming...
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 14, 2001, 11:03
|
#41
|
|
Guest
|
now THIS looks interesting 
I guess we need a climate model as well, if we are going to implement a terrain model like this.
BTW, isn't "1.0" a bit exaggerated. honestly, those "0.1" titels appeared a bit mor erealistic to me, although noone had anything to add to this one.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:41.
|
|
