January 26, 2001, 12:50
|
#1
|
|
Warlord
Local Time: 19:43
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Long Island, NY, America
Posts: 203
|
Spaces
do we need real spaces on the map. What if you give each unit a "range" they can move, a circle around the m cut short by mountains, swamps, etc. But, there would be squares underneath, to provide an exact location for a city. Units should be free to move where they want!
Any Comments?
|
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 17:19
|
#2
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 16:43
Local Date: October 30, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 26, 2001, 20:35
|
#3
|
|
Guest
|
I think I understand what you mean and sorry, but I don't agree. Certain units whould be limited. If we have units moving anywhere they want, then we might as well not have terrain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 27, 2001, 00:45
|
#4
|
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 00:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
Posts: 81
|
I know what you are talking about.
If you go to interplay.com and search for an old game called "conquest of the new world", you can buy it for 9-18 bucks. It makes a really cool "RTS-TBS" game that is what I think Jer8mr8 is talking about. It would be really cool and realistic...but would probably be very hard to make, considering how complex civ3 will probably be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 27, 2001, 23:51
|
#5
|
|
Settler
Local Time: 00:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Greatest Place on Earth
Posts: 23
|
I commented...now I am leaving. 
THis is a mixed idea in my head. It is really confusing. On one hand, I dont understand it at all...but I do want to like the idea. On the other hand, I dont understand it at all...and I am praying I hate the idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:43.
|
|
