Thread Tools
Old March 25, 2002, 20:13   #1
Kenjura
Chieftain
 
Kenjura's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 39
New and different complaints. ^_^
I don't care about tech trading. I really couldn't care less about bombardment not killing, though I'd prefer if it hit defenders at least half the time, instead of killing civilians or buildings.

My problem? The AI.

The AI overvalues excess resources and luxuries. They are just that: EXCESS. They are useless unless you lose all your other ones. I hand out extra luxuries and resources (carefully, those) at a penny a piece, because I don't need them. If I need them, I take them back. It shouldn't take two luxuries, a resource, and two techs to get ONE luxury from an AI for 20 turns.

The AI does not listen to each other. Every single AI asks me in turns for my map, often demanding money and techs as well, and they only offer their crappy map in return. I refuse 100% of the time, because I know the only reason they want my map is to find the tiny holes in my borders where they can plant cities.

The AI calculates value for itself, not for me. It doesn't even guess. I've refused The Republic a thousand times already. I might pay a few gold just to get it out of my hair. But it's 1500 AD! I'm halfway to FLIGHT for god's sake. Why would I ever pay 10000 gold and three techs for a useless ancient tech? Maybe the AI would, but I wouldn't.

They pretend as if you can actually haggle. You can't. Even if their demand is 10000 gold, you're lucky to get them down to 9990. Wow, what a window. 10 gold out of 10000. And of course, the process of haggling is very painstaking, as all you can do is delete and add offers, not change them.

The AI does not know how to fight. The only way they can score even minor victories over me is through their unpredictable idiocy, and my carelessness. They will declare wars over stupid demands like "give us three modern techs so we can upgrade our spearmen", then you won't see them for another 20 turns. The unit AI cares only for the moment. They will always attack the weakest target they know of, distance be damned. If your capital lies undefended within a single turn's movement of an enemy, just place a worker next to him, and they'll waste their turn capturing it. The division of AI into unit, city, and overlord is at fault here. Their communication is minimal.

Finally, a minor concern. What is the point of being able to threaten? It doesn't matter if I have 25 ICBMs and I've used them before, and the enemy has only spearmen, and I'm only demanding 3 gold. They won't give in, ever. Why even make it an option? And another thing...sometimes, I have games where everyone loves me to death. Yet I never get any gifts, ever. I give free techs and money all the time. Nobody even sends a thankyou card. Is the AI even playing the same game as the humans?



I don't expect the next patch to address this. It will be lethal bombardment (stupid and pointless) and other minor concerns.


My final verdict for civ3: disappointment.
Kenjura is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 21:37   #2
ACooper
Prince
 
ACooper's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In a dark and scary hole!
Posts: 728
Methinks you exagerate just a little.
__________________
Sorry....nothing to say!
ACooper is offline  
Old March 25, 2002, 22:21   #3
Coracle
Prince
 
Coracle's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 915
Methinks the verdict has been in for a long time: Civ III is a disappointment and a beta product rushed to market for the Holiday buying season.

Some people paid fifty bucks for a beta game! At least I got it for $45.
Coracle is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 00:13   #4
Scipio Africanu
Settler
 
Scipio Africanu's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6
I agree, partially, to your comments on trading with other civs.
__________________
Creator of: The Realism Epic Mod and Scipio Map Modification

"Donny your out of you element, Dude the China man is not the- Oh and Dude, China man is not the prefered nomenclature..." - Walter *The Big Lebowski
Scipio Africanu is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 00:23   #5
bigvic
Prince
 
bigvic's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Columbia, S.C.
Posts: 417
Yep
Kenjura:
Amen brother to about 95% at least of what you said. Her's my thoughts on the topic, for the third time on this forum.

25-03-2002 18:39

Whining

This was origionally posted on another thread, but obviously belongs here more. I feel much better now that I see so many w/ the same problem. My suggestion is get rid of this latest irritation (the patch) and wait for the next pain in the butt patch to come out, praying they don't succeed in messing up more than they fix.

What follows is a frustrated rant tapped out at 3:00 AM last night. As such, its nasty and foul, but even now, with time and perspective, I still stand by what I said. 25-03-2002 08:01

Whining

I guess I'm in a foul mood. The second patch was installed on friday, caused a crash on saturday. I play a heavily modified game that works fine w/o any patches (both have caused probs). What is the deal about mods and patches again?
Foul mood that I'm in, I noticed that the next patch that will probably cause the program to crash will fix the "can't sink a ship w/ a plane" idiocy. Just thinking about that started irritating me. For generally such a great game it sure feels like I'm playing a beta test version, or something programed by the fine folks at Microsoft that bring us windows. Anyway, the more I play this game, the more lamebrained garbage keeps popping up. How is it possible that they tested this thing? I swear, sometimes it seems like not at all, or worse, testing was done, problems noted, and shoddy product knowingly released.
I read some comments about spearmen killing tanks. Never seen it yet, though can imagine it would be irritating. You gotta rationalize things like that, though. I mean what does a spearman unit in the modern age represent anyway, a bunch of spear toting primitives, or a small, poorly organized second line group of AK-47 toting thugs? At least thats how I see it. What I find more irritating is that the AI seems to cheat more at higher levels instead of play a better game. How many times have I run a thorough spy sweep, found nothing, attacked, then been faced with 30 - 40 primo attack units the next, issueing out of one of his frontline cities? How many games have I been forced to hard charge toward the Great Library because apparantly the AI loves tech trading fairly with itself, but not me?
Yeah, I know, whine whine, boo hoo. But am I the only one here noticing these things? What about the inability of the AI to form coalitions? This bugs me far more than the spearman vs. tank thing. You know, that part of the game where ally 1 declares war on ally 2, who is at war with enemy one, who allies with ally 1, and so on, ad nauseum. Sure its a game, but its supposed to be simulation something, and what, I don't know. I know my history pretty well, and despite some pretty cutthroat periods in early modern Europe, what precedent is there, for large, major powers behaving like this? None, above the level of petty feudal squabbles, and even most of those had more logic than the chaotic, irrational world dogfight cage matches that one witnesses in Civ III. It seems they could have taken a few clues from the nearly flawless and much quicker diplomatic situation of SMAC. At least there you could win a cooperative victory, ask someone to "call off your vendetta against my friend", and do so much quicker. And don't even get me started on that pathetic excuse for a "scenario editor".
I know, stop flaming, but jeez! A few more months of evaluation and playtesting might have made what is, I admit, a remarkable game, a true masterpiece instead of the cobbled together-promising-yet-dissapointing-product-of-lazy-genius that it is.


PS: I personally hope they really fix this obsession of mine.
bigvic is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 08:57   #6
Thrawn05
King
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Constantly giggling as I type my posts.
Posts: 1,735
I agree the AI likes to gather as much of the same resource for itself to begin with, but that's because that somtimes resources are used up. So the AI wants to secure some other scource of that resource.

Even though I edited the game so that no resource can be used up or another one appear, the AI still does it. It must be coded in the EXE and not responding to edit rules.
__________________
I drink to one other, and may that other be he, to drink to another, and may that other be me!
Thrawn05 is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 09:27   #7
Zachriel
King
 
Zachriel's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,194
It depends on the position and your previous actions. I have often sold techs for large sums of gold. I have often bought techs for next to nothing. Same with resources and luxuries. The market varies, but if they don't like you, they will certainly demand more.

If you don't like the price, don't pay it. For me, the global markets are an important aspect of the game.
Zachriel is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 09:28   #8
ACooper
Prince
 
ACooper's Avatar
 
Local Time: 16:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In a dark and scary hole!
Posts: 728
Re: Yep
Quote:
Originally posted by bigvic
Kenjura:
Amen brother to about 95% at least of what you said. Her's my thoughts on the topic, for the third time on this forum.
.....

PS: I personally hope they really fix this obsession of mine.
(emphasis mine)

bigvic, for heaven's sake, please quit posting the exact same thing in every thread you can. This forum has rules.


As for tech trading, the AI seems to trade based on your relative strength. The stronger you are the better deals you are offered.
__________________
Sorry....nothing to say!
ACooper is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 09:31   #9
Zachriel
King
 
Zachriel's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,194
Re: New and different complaints. ^_^
Quote:
Originally posted by Kenjura

The AI does not know how to fight. The only way they can score even minor victories over me is through their unpredictable idiocy, and my carelessness. They will declare wars over stupid demands like "give us three modern techs so we can upgrade our spearmen", then you won't see them for another 20 turns. The unit AI cares only for the moment. . . . The division of AI into unit, city, and overlord is at fault here. Their communication is minimal.
Sounds like a lament about humanity in general.
Zachriel is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 09:41   #10
Zachriel
King
 
Zachriel's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,194
Re: New and different complaints. ^_^
Quote:
Originally posted by Kenjura
What is the point of being able to threaten? It doesn't matter if I have 25 ICBMs and I've used them before, and the enemy has only spearmen, and I'm only demanding 3 gold. They won't give in, ever.
In the latest GOTM, my adversary offered me 2/3 of his cities for peace. Not a bad tribute.

In a different game, I was playing Zulus. My enemy offered me 4 out of his five cities. His capital was blocked by an impi on a penisula of tundra. I lived up to the bargain and let him live for the rest of the game.


Last edited by Zachriel; March 27, 2002 at 09:55.
Zachriel is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 09:42   #11
bigvic
Prince
 
bigvic's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Columbia, S.C.
Posts: 417
You're right
acooper

Yeah, should have said LAST time.
bigvic is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 09:45   #12
Zachriel
King
 
Zachriel's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,194
Re: Yep
Quote:
Originally posted by bigvic
A few more months of evaluation and playtesting might have made what is, I admit, a remarkable game, a true masterpiece instead of the cobbled together-promising-yet-dissapointing-product-of-lazy-genius that it is.
I would much rather have the game in its present form and available for gameplay. If you would rather, just don't play it until next year. Then pretend it was just released.
Zachriel is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 10:16   #13
bigvic
Prince
 
bigvic's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Columbia, S.C.
Posts: 417
Re: Re: Yep
Quote:
Originally posted by Zachriel


I would much rather have the game in its present form and available for gameplay. If you would rather, just don't play it until next year. Then pretend it was just released.
Actually, if I weren't so addicted to it, I might follow your advice. Just wish I had not blown the $50 (I'm a real cheapo). But understand, this is a thread dedicated to complaints. Believe me, I have more, but then constructive criticism for firaxis would be better. My hope is that the guys at firaxis will run across this stuff, not get too offended at the rantings of frustrated customers, and do better next time. I'm kind of giving up on these patches. That said, what we have is basically a beta version and I suppose we're the test group who pay for that priviledge. At least its not as bad as CTP2. As far as that is concerned, I guess I just expect more from something that has Sid's name on it. I'm also confident that these guys will fix the screw ups sooner or later (later, my guess) and I will be happy all the time then. Just wish theyed give some kind of discount to purchasers of the origional.
bigvic is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 10:26   #14
Tarquelne
Warlord
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 208
Re: New and different complaints. ^_^
Firaxis TO DO list for Mar 26, 2002:

Quote:
Originally posted by Kenjura
It shouldn't take two luxuries, a resource, and two techs to get ONE luxury from an AI for 20 turns.
Make all trades 1 for 1, regardless of relative civ strengths, relationship, or the value of the items being traded.

Quote:
The AI does not listen to each other. Every single AI asks me in turns for my map,
Make the computer players less likely to trade with human, more likely to trade with each other. Re-impliment trading during human turn.

Quote:
...and they only offer their crappy map in return....

The AI calculates value for itself, not for me.
Have the AI never offer the human a deal that doesn't favor the human.

Quote:
But it's 1500 AD! I'm halfway to FLIGHT for god's sake. Why would I ever pay 10000 gold and three techs for a useless ancient tech? Maybe the AI would, but I wouldn't.

Even if their demand is 10000 gold, you're lucky to get them down to 9990.
Call back CDs with pre-release code on them.

Quote:
The AI does not know how to fight.
Create PC "civ" type game AI 10-times better than any ever written before.
Tarquelne is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 10:38   #15
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Re: Re: New and different complaints. ^_^


Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquelne
Firaxis TO DO list for Mar 26, 2002:

Call back CDs with pre-release code on them.
What does that mean?
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 10:41   #16
Zachriel
King
 
Zachriel's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,194
Re: Re: New and different complaints. ^_^
Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquelne
Firaxis TO DO list for Mar 26, 2002:
But what will they do tomorrow?!
Zachriel is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 10:44   #17
Tarquelne
Warlord
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 208
Re: Re: Re: New and different complaints. ^_^
Quote:
Originally posted by SpencerH
What does that mean?
If the AIs in K.s games are asking 10000 gold+3 techs for Rep. (and Rep. is "useless") when Flight is near, or only going down to 9990 from 10000 in negotation, and K. seems to imply things like that happen regularly. K. must be using an old, pre-public release version of the game. Firaxis should replace those at no cost to the consumer.
Tarquelne is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 10:49   #18
SpencerH
Civilization III PBEMCivilization III MultiplayerBtS Tri-League
Emperor
 
SpencerH's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
Re: Re: Re: Re: New and different complaints. ^_^
Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquelne

If the AIs in K.s games are asking 10000 gold+3 techs for Rep. (and Rep. is "useless") when Flight is near, or only going down to 9990 from 10000 in negotation, and K. seems to imply things like that happen regularly. K. must be using an old, pre-public release version of the game. Firaxis should replace those at no cost to the consumer.
Thanks. Now what would the implications of that be I wonder?
__________________
We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
SpencerH is offline  
Old March 26, 2002, 10:54   #19
Thrawn05
King
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Constantly giggling as I type my posts.
Posts: 1,735
Re: Re: Re: New and different complaints. ^_^
Quote:
Originally posted by Zachriel


But what will they do tomorrow?!
Like always.

__________________
I drink to one other, and may that other be he, to drink to another, and may that other be me!
Thrawn05 is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 03:04   #20
The Thinker
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 14:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 33
Re: Re: New and different complaints. ^_^
Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquelne
Make all trades 1 for 1, regardless of relative civ strengths, relationship, or the value of the items being traded.
This seems far too far in the other dirrection. I am rich and they are small, I don't mind paying extra for a luxury because I can afford it, say one luxury and a tech, or one luxury and 10 gold per turn. I guess I'm saying there should be a top amount, say 120% of an items value. It would be a smart thing to do, because at current prices it's easier to build 20 tanks. If I get an ally I can kill a Civ just because it overcharged,

Quote:
Make the computer players less likely to trade with human, more likely to trade with each other.
What I'd really like to see is the AI treat the human player the same as another AI. Instead the AI will trade tech to each other for effectively 0 gold.

Rik
The Thinker is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 05:19   #21
Kenjura
Chieftain
 
Kenjura's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 39
Thanks for the lovely to-do list.
I wish I had the capacity to post complete garbage. I only post criticism if there's at least a chance for it to be constructive. Criticising other people's criticism isn't going to improve civ3, nor will it stop them.


On another note, just what am I doing wrong? A strong human gets *good* offers from weak AI? Do I have to play Chieftain or Deity to get that? No, the only deals I get are 95% world map for world map, and 5% I give them some great new tech for some crappy old one that I've refused 20 times and could research myself in 4 turns if I wanted it.

There is the very core of my argument.
Kenjura is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 07:36   #22
Pius Popprasch
Warlord
 
Pius Popprasch's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 120
I get 2 Luxuries for one, on Emperor. Not every offer is good, though. If you'd play against me you'd complain probably even more. About my unfair attacks and trade offers.
Pius Popprasch is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 08:42   #23
Pyrodrew
Prince
 
Pyrodrew's Avatar
 
Local Time: 14:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 679
Quote:
Originally posted by Pius Popprasch
I get 2 Luxuries for one, on Emperor. Not every offer is good, though. If you'd play against me you'd complain probably even more. About my unfair attacks and trade offers.
I'm tired of explaining why 1 for 1 trades aren't always fair, but you bring up another excellent point - if humans wouldn't do it, why should the AI?

I wish I could offer you unfair trade offers & unfair counter-attacks too. And we could be really unfair to Kenjura. So... when is that multiplayer + script & complete editor patch suppose to be released.
Pyrodrew is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 08:46   #24
Zachriel
King
 
Zachriel's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,194
Quote:
Originally posted by Pius Popprasch
I get 2 Luxuries for one, on Emperor. Not every offer is good, though. If you'd play against me you'd complain probably even more. About my unfair attacks and trade offers.
Of course! I usually play Monarch, but I still get great deals sometimes. It all "depends."

Keep in mind that at the higher levels your money is being devalued by the markets, like Argentina's peso. This choice of devaluation is a player choice at the start of the game.
Zachriel is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 14:21   #25
Tarquelne
Warlord
 
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally posted by Kenjura
I only post criticism if there's at least a chance for it to be constructive.
Criticising other people's criticism isn't going to improve civ3, nor will it stop them.
The TO DO list seemed better (easier, more fun, probably just as effective) than posting "I think your utterly wrong, here's why...." Sorry if you thought I was merely trying to criticize-without-construction, but I do think that each response does point out the problem with your complaint. You're supposed to realize, for example, that there are reasons why the AI offers "unfair" deals.

The point of criticizing suggestions/complaints I don't agree with is - if the complainer is not going to be "stopped" (are you saying that you will _never_ change your mind, no matter what?) - to try to show others - esp. Firaxis - that a change doesn't need to be made. If people make what I think are bad suggestions and complaints based on misconceptions, I'm going to argue against them. I just think that's better than threads that simply stack on complaint upon the other.
Tarquelne is offline  
Old March 27, 2002, 16:17   #26
steelehc
Prince
 
steelehc's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Alaska
Posts: 434
There's a difference between an "unfair" deal, and 10000 gold for republic. Thats just ****1ng ridicioulous. I agree that some of the "new and different complaints" are nothing new or insightful, but this one is.

Steele
__________________
If this were a movie, there'd be a tunnel or something near here for us to escape through.....
steelehc is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:11.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team