1.21F? What happened to 1.18F?!?

The Rook · April 15, 2002, 13:54

What is Firaxis trying to pull? We had the 1.16 then the 1.17 and now we skip to 1.21? Don't they realize how confusing that is? What about us fans who have made websites? We now have to go and change all of our references to 1.18 to 1.21. This just proves that Firaxis doesn't listen to the customer!!! I'm on the verge of deleting any Civ3 crap off my hard drive. Hell, I might even reformat just to be sure there's nothing left.

ixnay · April 15, 2002, 13:56

Relax...this is the same reason why we went from 1.01 to 1.16...they did make v1.18, but it didn't pass QA so they fixed it to 1.19, and so on. They don't hate you.

Solver · April 15, 2002, 13:57

Nonsense here. They never said 1.18f, and the entire 1.18 thing is, let's say, Apolyton-fiction. Noone says they have to listen to us about how to program.

Besides, we went from 1.07 to 1.16 after the first patch.

ALPHA WOLF 64 · April 15, 2002, 14:01

ok , give him the buggy 1.18. Then he can complain about how it doesnt work.

Just teasin ya man, thats life in software development.

Ming · April 15, 2002, 14:02

Hmmm... you can tell the whiners are getting really desperate for attention when they have to starting threads so that they can whine about the numbering of the patch...

But please... I'm sure there are a million other places you can go whine about this... a new thread isn't needed.