Official Apolyton Political Parties Thread - Page 5

cavebear · May 31, 2002, 16:16

Quote:

Originally posted by H Tower
what does the UNPARTY stand for? is it still anti-party? then what's the point?

edit: i'm still waiting for someone to make me an offer

Being a member of the UNPARTY means that you actively declare your resistance to party politics. It is a place for independents to get together to celebrate their independence. As the Mad Hatter said, "A very merry unbirthday to you".

Space05us · May 31, 2002, 16:50

The UNparty are a bunch of Anarchists

civman2000 · May 31, 2002, 17:18

Join the AAAC and keep Apolytonia from being overrun by a crazy constitution!

H Tower · May 31, 2002, 17:18

so is the UNparty against itself? and with your liberal use of smileys, i suspect you of secretly being a sodaquista

Marquis de Sodaq · May 31, 2002, 17:33

Quote:

Originally posted by H Tower
so is the UNparty against itself? and with your liberal use of smileys, i suspect you of secretly being a sodaquista

conspiracy!

cavebear · May 31, 2002, 18:00

Quote:

Originally posted by H Tower
so is the UNparty against itself? and with your liberal use of smileys, i suspect you of secretly being a sodaquista

Yes. It takes a rare and special kind of person to overcome the apparent internal conflict. And looking at the list of UNPARTY members, we have exactly those people. Besides, "cavebearistas" seemed both awkward and egotistical (no offence to Sodaq, he *earned* his followers honestly).

And, I will add, we can semi-logically claim secret membership of everyone not specifically a member of any other party...

H Tower · May 31, 2002, 18:16

well you can, it just doesn't mean that we really are

civman2000 · May 31, 2002, 18:32

http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...&pagenumber=4.

My new minion space05us has explained why there is no need for a constitution very simply. Join the AAAC!

H Tower · May 31, 2002, 18:48

are you against term limits too?

Space05us · May 31, 2002, 18:57

simply:no we're not against term limits. we just don't want a set of rules that are too binding, and would require long amounts of time to change

Xenozod · May 31, 2002, 18:58

Speak on, brother!

Space05us · May 31, 2002, 18:59

my Comrade made a slight mistake on his last post:

http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...5&pagenumber=2

Xenozod have you thought about joining the AAAC, we can always use more members!

Xenozod · May 31, 2002, 19:09

Sorry, already joined someone!

Space05us · May 31, 2002, 19:17

You can always leave them you know? They wouldn't mind they're a big party already one member wouldn't make a difference to them

c'mon join the AAAC

Xenozod · May 31, 2002, 19:24

Yes, but I agree with them on points and besides, I'm not JUST one member, you know?

But if I find things not satisfactory, I will consider it and let you know.

Space05us · May 31, 2002, 19:27

very well, that's your decision to make.

civman2000 · May 31, 2002, 22:27

1. What mistake?
2. I am even for stronger term limits. AS long as it is not officially written out or anything and it's just understood by everyone.

Space05us · June 1, 2002, 02:49

I did not intend to offend you Comrade but;
Click on you link and see where it takes you

Apolyton CS Forums > Civilization III > Civ3-Play the World > Why Korea may *NOT* be

Now click on my link, I believe this is what you had intended to happen

Apolyton CS Forums > Civilization II > Civ2-Democratic Games > Constitution Committee: Discussion thread

civman2000 · June 1, 2002, 10:17

ooops...wrong link (I visit the ptw forum a lot too).

Kuciwalker · June 1, 2002, 17:37

We have a profusion of small parties, several of which don't have a clear ideology or even policy issue. The UNPARTY is against parties (???????), the Foreign Policy Party hasn't stated their foreign policy (like, are you against war or for it?), and we have TWO fundie parties. Come on people, just join a big party!

civman2000 · June 1, 2002, 19:37

Yeah, like the growing AAAC! There is no need for a constitution, everyone understands how things work. A constitution would be too binding, even if it could be changed it would have a psychological anti-change effect.

If you think a constitution would do more hram than good, join the AAAC!

Xenozod · June 1, 2002, 22:57

Oh, btw civman2000, I also like playing as every nation(mainly in scenarios), even if I have to fight against myself. Just making sure you know you aren't the only crazy person here.(Although you could know that by just looking around)

Kuciwalker · June 1, 2002, 23:24

Yes, I'm insane too.

Xenozod · June 2, 2002, 01:28

This comes as a surprise to no one.

atawa · June 2, 2002, 05:43

Do we have any sane people here

MrWhereItsAt · June 2, 2002, 05:57

Saneness is overrated. History remembers only the mad and the brilliant - and these usually come hand in hand.

Minister of WAR, not peace.
MrWIA.

Space05us · June 2, 2002, 06:11

if a person were sane that would give them to much time to realize that it's all a consipiracy to find out who took the cookie from the cookie jar...

Kuciwalker · June 2, 2002, 12:21

Quote:

Originally posted by atawa
Do we have any sane people here

That question proves that the answer is NO.

H Tower · June 5, 2002, 12:10

After the recent proposals for medals, titles, honors, naming ships, etc; I'm considering starting a party against big government wich has lots of extra positions and committees.

However, I believe that this platform would fit in nicely with the AAC's platform of no strict constitution. what to you say?

MrWhereItsAt · June 5, 2002, 22:45

The AAAC is against overcomplication - we are asimple people, H Tower.

We prefer to use our time and intellect to play the game well, and certainly not to overburden everyone.

You're more than welcome to join the party with both VP and Minister of WAR (we have influence

). And Space05us is a diligent poster like you, too.

Minister of WAR, not peace.
MrWIA.