May 6, 2002, 06:21
|
#31
|
|
King
Local Time: 03:09
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: the contradiction is filled with holes...
Posts: 1,398
|
SUOMI! But I would settle on Vikings... 
__________________
I'm not a complete idiot: some parts are still missing.
|
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2002, 07:21
|
#32
|
|
Settler
Local Time: 17:09
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1
|
Carthaginians
Mongols
Vikings
I always liked those. wished they hadn't taken them out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2002, 09:51
|
#33
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:09
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 978
|
Give me every last MFing one of them. 
I don't care who they add. If the editor in the XP allows me to add as many as I would like, then I'll be happy.
I think it's more important to be able to add who we like than certain new civs being added to the game. There's no way every single player is going to be completely satisfied with 8 new civs. There's always going to be someone who thinks a couple of them are unworthy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2002, 10:12
|
#34
|
Local Time: 01:09
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Land of teh Vikingz
Posts: 9,897
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Cesa
Although most people would think they wouldn't belong in civ since they are too small or "young", I'd like to have many present european civs (scotland, spain, italy, ireland and so on) and other civs I know about (australia for example).
The reason is this: I want civs I know something about, and care for in some way. There are a lot of civs suggested here that I don't know anything about of have any reference to, and those civs aren't very fun to play (IMO). And I prefer 'fun' before 'politically and historically correct', I mean, it's just a game, and it's supposed to be fun...
Again, I am not suggesting this is a very good idea for Firaxis to do, I'm just answering to this thread's topic.
|
Good point  I´d love to play Scots, Irish, Picts or Welsh and then make a pact with the others and declare war on the English.  Or play Normans and land at Hastings, or burn Rome with the Visigoths or the Huns, etc, etc.
__________________
I love being beaten by women - Lorizael
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2002, 15:48
|
#35
|
|
King
Local Time: 13:09
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: of Hamilton, New-Zealand.
Posts: 1,160
|
They'll probably give us those blank Civ templates we've been asking for  .
__________________
Grrr | Pieter Lootsma | Hamilton, NZ | grrr@orcon.net.nz
Waikato University, Hamilton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6, 2002, 19:51
|
#36
|
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 17:09
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 31
|
Canadians, Canadians, Canadians!!
Canadians are excellent manipulators of resources, able to survive in frigid climates, a world-leader in peacekeeping and hockey.
Also: Polynesians, Cascadians, Siberians, Australians, Brazilians, Malians. All are not very notable historically, but would fill holes on the map.
Realistically: Spaniards, Vikings, Mongols (also a good gap-filler), Celts, Incans, Carthaginians.
Historically: Franks, Goths, Rus, Indus, Mayans. All of which (except for Dutch) were absorbed into other civs, or had the same territory.
__________________
Civis pacem parabellum
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 7, 2002, 00:30
|
#37
|
|
King
Local Time: 13:09
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: of Hamilton, New-Zealand.
Posts: 1,160
|
Canadians? Then they won't have to worry about jews, a civ that EVERYBODY will want to bully - Canada.
__________________
Grrr | Pieter Lootsma | Hamilton, NZ | grrr@orcon.net.nz
Waikato University, Hamilton.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 7, 2002, 07:11
|
#38
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:09
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,496
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Snapcase
The Uralians/Finno-Ugric Peoples
|
Hmm, I bet you were thinking hungarians and not finns
Hat persze ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 7, 2002, 10:14
|
#39
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:09
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ashes
Posts: 3,065
|
Why not having civs that would be somewhat scattered on the Earth map? Ever tried to recreate history in civ2, you lack so many civs that you have to make choices like leaving America empty... So where are civs lacking?
Incas, Brazilians, Khmer, Polynesians, Malians, Ethiopians, Inuits, Australians?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:09.
|
|
