Clarifying Some Confusion

St Leo · May 5, 2001, 00:23

A signed 4-bit number allows for 8 values with a positive/negative sign. CivII had a maximum of seven civs because the barbarians were included in the total. Conversely, CivIII probably doesn't pretend that barbarians are a civ and allows for 8 civs. The "7" in the preview probably referred to the number of AI components.

P.S. No, I have no idea why Firaxis uses bloody 4-bit variables. It's not as if using an unsigned byte would somehow slow down a 166 MHz system.

------------------
Leons Petrazickis (St. Leo)
http://aventine.cf-developer.net/minizigg/
petrazi@sprint.ca

Russian King · May 5, 2001, 10:15

Hehe. I agree- there should be a lot more slots for civs(even if they arent supported)
Poor Roman has trouble believing the old news

.

Gramphos · May 5, 2001, 11:26

quote:

Originally posted by St Leo on 05-05-2001 12:23 AM
Conversely, CivIII probably doesn't pretend that barbarians are a civ and allows for 8 civs.

So how shall the game know if a unit is Barbarian?

I think they are using bytes to check what civs you have some kind of relation with. Every bit in the byte represents a civ. And if it is set you the kind of relation with that civ. I.E. contact and peace.

May 5, 2001, 11:46

i find it hard to believe that there are still people pondering on whether to use an extra bit or not

that is if they are building something from scratch...