FoA: The schedule

Solver · May 19, 2002, 06:30

Currently I've made my mind on what will the next few installements of FoA be, and here it is.

#10 - DanQ, email to whom I am now typing in another window.
#11 - DarkCloud, the man behind statitics at Apolyton.
#12 - Solver, the man behind PBEM Ratings and the stupid interviews.
#13 - MichaeltheGreat - Ming's colleague, one of the OTF cops.
#14 - Locutus - The guy behind many of the CtP 2 mods who has some points on CtP vs. Civ to tell.
#15 - Uberkrux - the big Civ 3 rant master, man who has provided way too many ideas before the game got released.

Skanky Burns · May 19, 2002, 10:36

Solver · May 19, 2002, 10:46

BTW, I almost typed #15 - Velociryx when I realized he was already interviewed

.

Guynemer · May 19, 2002, 12:05

I think the UberKruX interview should be canned.

Maybe it's just me, but somehow I find people who proudly display Nazi symbols to be repulsive and sickening.

moomin · May 19, 2002, 12:09

Guynemer: I agree. Only I think it goes for commie symbols as well.

Guynemer · May 19, 2002, 12:18

You won't get much debate from me there.

Scouse Gits · May 19, 2002, 12:29

Sounds a good list to me - but I fear i must agree that we should keep within the bounds (Hueij?) of good taste with our choice of avatars...

SG[1]

TCO · May 19, 2002, 12:38

I just don't think Uberkrux is noteworthy enough to rate an interview...

I would put Nark in there if he had just been a bit more active in recent years. Lancer is probably famous enough to rate one...

TCO · May 19, 2002, 12:40

Maybe a group interview, would be interesting.

Either multiple intervewers or ees.

A group might be the English brew crew: Stew, Iaiaian, PH, etc...

Bugs ****ing Bunny · May 19, 2002, 12:55

Hasn't Lancer already been done?

DarkCloud · May 19, 2002, 13:32

according to my records- yes

Locutus · May 19, 2002, 13:32

I agree on Uberkrux. People like Markos, Harlan, Paul, korn, St Leo, Narck, CD, Mark Everson, WarVoid, Allard, Stefan Härtel, hexagonian, etc are far more deserving of an interview, probably more than most people on this list (= all except Dan)...

MichaeltheGreat · May 19, 2002, 13:37

You mean I'm still here?

Solver · May 19, 2002, 13:57

Erm, I got avatars off in my preferences

. If it was for those things, I wouldn't interview Locutus either, since he considers Israel to be a terrorist state, while I support it (BTW, thanks Wouter for that, I later read the final part, really good discussion!). My choice of Uberkrux here is motivated by me reading the Civ 3 forums most of all, and I actually found many of his posts interesting to read.

But of course, I'm willing to listen to your feedback.

Immortal Wombat · May 19, 2002, 15:23

I'd interview Locutus if you wouldn't

DarkCloud · May 19, 2002, 22:09

We all know that Chris62 should real-time interview me

I'm sure he'd enjoy it

Shadowstrike · May 19, 2002, 23:03

I am greatly thankful that I will never be subjected to the grilling and personality removal process that is FoA. Oh wait, di I say that out loud?

Skanky Burns · May 19, 2002, 23:34

Korn would be a good interview.

Hueij · May 20, 2002, 05:46

Quote:

Originally posted by Scouse Gits

Sounds a good list to me - but I fear i must agree that we should keep within the bounds (Hueij?) of good taste with our choice of avatars...

SG[1]

Heh... Good thing I'm not on the list then

It's just a pic of Bettie Page, but if it offends anyone, let me know and I'll change it... (tho I still like it myself...)

David Floyd · May 20, 2002, 21:26

Ooh ohh I wanna be interviewed

Inverse Icarus · May 20, 2002, 22:04

bah. silence the smart ones for their jokes because it "offends" people.

-- cuts self off before ming comes back --

DarkCloud · May 20, 2002, 22:09

Quote:

Originally posted by Shadowstrike
I am greatly thankful that I will never be subjected to the grilling and personality removal process that is FoA. Oh wait, di I say that out loud?

If you start posting more... it is highly likely you will be forced into an interview eventually

Guynemer · May 20, 2002, 22:25

Yeah, great joke. Symbols of Naziism and white supremacists are just ****ing hilarious.

Get a clue, jackass.

Inverse Icarus · May 21, 2002, 14:48

Quote:

Originally posted by Guynemer
Yeah, great joke. Symbols of Naziism and white supremacists are just ****ing hilarious.

Get a clue, jackass.

oh and i suppose the people who believe that the americans "deserved" the wtc falling are just fine the way they are too. i'm glad they dont get censored.

the killing of my father was somehow <b>deserved</b>, well as long as they had a effin' cause i guess it was ok.

i'm not going to go into how hitler revived germany economically and such, waste of words on simple minded people that overgeneralize. "all nazis were evil" isnt a very valid statement now is it. thats like me saying "all muslims killed my father". it's stupid and you people are stupid for the exact same reason.

the nazi party was similiar to the labour party in england. it was a political party. the LEADERS were the evil ones, not the party itself.

and anyway, people sport the good ol' hammer and sickle, when good ol' papa joe killed tons and tons of people, some were even <b>pogroms</b> aimed at the jewish people themselves.

but those are ok, because... oh yea. there isnt a reason.

"i may not agree with what you say, but i will defend to my death your right to say it"

--accredited to voltaire

Inverse Icarus · May 21, 2002, 14:50

oh anyway solver, there really are people more suited for interviewing, you could do them first if you wish.

i dont go anywhere really, just a couple of forced trips to mingapulco now and then.

Bugs ****ing Bunny · May 21, 2002, 15:36

Aw, you stupid little tosser. You could have shown some class by just offering a quick apology for a misjudged joke but instead you're just dragging yourself down in argument you haven't the brains to carry off.

You weren't using the symbol of the nazi party. You were using the symbol of the Einsatzgruppen and Concentration camp guards. Come on then, Mr Revisionism- let's hear your argument about how they were all just a bunch of loveable scamps.

Yes- Hitler revitalised Germany's economy, but just about any shaved ape could have had the same short-lived success by using the tactics he used- such as declaring all women's places are in the home making babies and giving their jobs to the men. Hey presto! No unemployment- on paper. The truth is that most leaders just won't stoop that low, and I'm ****ing glad of the fact.

The nazi party was founded on bigotry, violence and crime. To compare it to any legitimate party is displaying a monstrous lack of brains, or a seriously warped set of values. Have you got a shrine to Himmler in your bedroom or what?

This post facto attempt at justification is wasting your time and everyone elses. You used a Totenkopf as an avatar as an anti-Israeli gesture- whether you were joking or not it's still an unbelieveably moronic thing to do. Then, in a fit of pique, you replace it with a white supremacist flag. To top it off you're now throwing your toys out of the pram and talking revisionism.

This forum has no shortage of stupid little boys, but congratulation, cretin. You just made number one in that list. Now grow up.

Inverse Icarus · May 21, 2002, 15:59

Quote:

Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny
Aw, you stupid little tosser. You could have shown some class by just offering a quick apology for a misjudged joke but instead you're just dragging yourself down in argument you haven't the brains to carry off.

the apology was ignored in several other threads.

Inverse Icarus · May 21, 2002, 16:02

and i had the swasika, and then someone changed it, so i went to the triple 7 flag, again changed. i then went stormtrooper in a fit of defiance, smacked down.

Guynemer · May 21, 2002, 16:02

1) Obviously most of us never saw said alleged apology.

2) Nice job refuting all of Bugs' points. Are we to take that as an admission of guilt, "it's a fair cop"?

Inverse Icarus · May 21, 2002, 16:02

Quote:

Originally posted by Guynemer
1) Obviously most of us never saw said alleged apology.

2) Nice job refuting all of Bugs' points. Are we to take that as an admission of guilt, "it's a fair cop"?

i'm working on it.