Thread Tools
Old June 3, 2002, 11:28   #1
ChaotikVisions
Civilization IV Creators
Prince
 
ChaotikVisions's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 557
Would this make the scientific trait more useful?
While playing a game and upgrading my units yet another time after discovering better tech, I had an idea. Since alot think the scientific trait is kinda uselss, 3 free advances and less costly science structures, how about adding upgrading units at half cost? Since they're scientific they'd adapt to new technology more quickly, and it'd be a definite value to players then. Anyway, tell me what you guys think. I'd have posted this in general btw, but since major changes probably aren't gonna happen through patches, I decided to put it here in hopes for XP.
__________________
"Every good communist should know political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." - Mao tse-Tung
ChaotikVisions is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 11:38   #2
Carver
Prince
 
Carver's Avatar
 
Local Time: 19:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: reprocessing plutonium, Yongbyon, NK
Posts: 560
Re: Would this make the scientific trait more useful?
Quote:
Originally posted by ChaotikVisions
Since alot think the scientific trait is kinda uselss, 3 free advances and less costly science structures,
The scientific trait is one of the two most useful (with religious) in the game. Making it more powerful would really make other traits, ala expansionist, unattractive. I don't know about anybody else, but I'll take three freebie advances any day of the week.
Carver is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 11:52   #3
Solver
lifer
Civilization IV CreatorsAge of Nations TeamApolytoners Hall of FamePolyCast TeamBtS Tri-LeagueThe Courts of Candle'BreC4WDG Team Apolyton
Deity
 
Solver's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 18,355
I agree with Carver that Scientific is quite useful as it is. And in any case, 50% less to upgrade cost is too powerful. It's a free benefit of a Wonder (!), and something that is there for the enitre game. I'll build lots of Warriors, get Iron Working, upgrade all to Swordsmen for really little money...hm... too powerful.
__________________
Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man
Solver is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 11:54   #4
statusperfect
King
 
statusperfect's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,333
Industrial and religious are overpowered. (industrial for the worker effectivity and religious for one turn revolutions and cheap temples) I always have to move down one difficulty level when i play a non-industrous civ.

If you make religious and industrous weaker the other traits will be well balanced.
statusperfect is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 11:56   #5
ChaotikVisions
Civilization IV Creators
Prince
 
ChaotikVisions's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 557
Hmm, I hadn't noticed much of a bonus using scientific, the main trait I usually aim for is industrious. I just like being able to get my continent set up quickly. But I guess half cost would be too powerful, it just seemed like 3 advances was a bit small.
__________________
"Every good communist should know political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." - Mao tse-Tung
ChaotikVisions is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 16:01   #6
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
expansionist is the only trait that needs work IMHO
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 16:04   #7
dunk
Prince
 
dunk's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally posted by statusperfect
Industrial and religious are overpowered. (industrial for the worker effectivity and religious for one turn revolutions and cheap temples) I always have to move down one difficulty level when i play a non-industrous civ.
I disagree with these traits being overpowered. It seems like you have found a good way to play with the Japanese(?). I think all the traits are fine the way they are. Remember, other players may perform better with other traits.

I like the Scientific trait as is. It gives you 3 free techs (Nationalism without any research is a big plus), and half price buildings (remember, libraries, universities, research labs also contribute to culture).

If you have to turn the difficulty down with other traits, that just means you haven't used them to your advantage properly. Each civ plays differently. Religious civs can change governments easier, militaristic civs get more leaders on average, industrious civs build roads and such faster, expansionist civs get more and better goodie huts, commercial civs get trade bonuses (cheaper airports & harbors). Then there's the UUs for each civ, a whole other ballgame.
dunk is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 16:44   #8
Spiffor
Civilization III Democracy GamePtWDG LegolandApolytoners Hall of Fame
 
Spiffor's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
Half priced upgrades are way too powerful. Germans would be invincible if you so this. I think scientific is pretty solid, in terms of culture esp. Plus, many wonders are scientific, and it's easy to get a peaceful golden age. I don't know if you often play with unscientific Civs, but it's horrible to build universities with them, and libraries take too much time too IMO.
Industrious is not that overpowered (granted, I only play industrious Civs ) : when you're not industrious, you just have to produce twice more workers, which isn't that problematic once you have a steady population growth.
Religious rules, tat's a given. Luckily, the Egyptian UU sucks, they'd be horribly powerful otherwise.

Dunk999 :
Commercial is good (reduces corruption, and gives extra money on cities/metropolises), but not as great as you think : commercial buildings are not twice cheaper.
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
Spiffor is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 17:17   #9
moomin
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG Planet University of TechnologyACDG The Cybernetic Consciousness
King
 
moomin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Moo Like In Moomin
Posts: 1,579
Religeous +++++
Industrious ++
Scientific ++++

Use a lot of free captured workers, fer crist's sake.
__________________
"The number of political murders was a little under one million (800,000 - 900,000)." - chegitz guevara on the history of the USSR.
"I think the real figures probably are about a million or less." - David Irving on the number of Holocaust victims.
moomin is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 18:38   #10
punkbass2000
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III Democracy GameApolyton UniversityCivilization III PBEM
King
 
punkbass2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
Commercial is on the verge of useless. It needs complete re-tooling. Scientific is decent, IMO. If I had to order the traits based on overall usefulness (ie. no specific maps, like huge pangaea, 60%, for expansionist), I would say:
Religious
Industrious
Scientific+Militaristic
Expansionistic
Commercial
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
punkbass2000 is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 19:22   #11
Mikhail
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 19:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: flesh.and.binary
Posts: 75
I'd put Scientific above Religious. Religious only really shines when it comes to revolutions. I only change governments twice a game as it is (Depotism - Republic - Democracy). I don't start wars, and am always defensive, so democracy's war weariness rarely effects me.

Industrial is the best in the game, period. uber-workers are very very important. Then Scientific.

Expansionist is only useful in the beginning of the game. And it's VERY useful then too. Can make the difference of winning, or being trapped on a peninsula.
__________________
The two real political parties in America are the Winners and the Losers. The people don't acknowledge this. They claim membership in two imaginary parties, the Republicans and the Democrats, instead." - Kurt Vonnegut Jr. My (crappy) LiveJournal
Mikhail is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 19:24   #12
punkbass2000
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III Democracy GameApolyton UniversityCivilization III PBEM
King
 
punkbass2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
I would say religious shines with half price temples and cathedrals. I find them generally more useful than libraries and universities.
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
punkbass2000 is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 19:48   #13
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
Religious is probably the best overall trait, but I see nothing wrong with scientific, cheap libraries and Unis plus a free tech. Commericial is a little weak, giving them cheaper marketplaces and banks would go a long way to making them about as good as any. In fact, I'm a little mystified why this wasn't done in the beginning.
Expansionist is the only trait that needs a LOT of work IMHO. What a lot of mods have done, and what I reccemending doing is giving them a "pioneer" unit that functions essentially as a settler but costs 20 shields instead of 30 and can move 2. If Firaxis does this in the XP, expansionist civs would be on about an equal footing with the rest of the civs.
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 20:19   #14
punkbass2000
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III Democracy GameApolyton UniversityCivilization III PBEM
King
 
punkbass2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
IMO, the problem with augmenting Expansionistic civs is that on a Huge, Pangaea, 60% water map, expansionistic is already too powerful. On that kind of map, you kind easily find yourself in the middle ages by 1000AD, without trading. Any benefits given to expansionistic civs would make it completely overwhelming as a civ trait. Can you imagine the Iroquois in that situation with 20 shield settlers? Religious is generally regarded to be a solid trait, expansionistic in that situations is insane, MWs are among the best UUs and 2/3 price settlers on top? Why even play the game? Just declare yourself the winner!
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
punkbass2000 is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 20:23   #15
Cyclotron
Never Ending StoriesThe Courts of Candle'Bre
King
 
Cyclotron's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cyclo-who?
Posts: 2,995
I happen to like scientific... cheap libraries are great.

On another note, exactly how much does commercial actually do for corruption? It seems like anything battling corruption would be great, but what is the actual factor?
__________________
Lime roots and treachery!
"Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten
Cyclotron is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 20:37   #16
Hurrying Heinz
Settler
 
Hurrying Heinz's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: of the Gulag Archipelago
Posts: 10
Industrious, Expansionst are the best traits. You can send your scouts all over the place and get a head start on techs. (granted that you don't start on an island) Industrious is good because it means you can build more roads faster, so you can connect your cities to luxeries/ resources faster and can move your units faster from place to place
Hurrying Heinz is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 21:36   #17
The_Aussie_Lurker
BtS Tri-League
King
 
Local Time: 01:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Posts: 1,451
Actually I feel that to make expansionist truly equal to the other traits, it might be good to have one or more of the following abilities:
all units get +1 mp
all exploration and settlement units are 1/2 price.
all improvements which speed population growth are 1/2 price
all units treat enemy roads and RR's as friendly
all units ignore terrain effects on movement

Obviously giving the expansionist trait ALL these characteristics would be unrealistic, but a couple of them, or one of the most powerful ones (like the last one) would go a long way to bringing expansionist civs up to par!
Anyway, just a thought!

Yours,
The_Aussie_Lurker.
The_Aussie_Lurker is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 21:40   #18
monkspider
Civilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV CreatorsGalCiv Apolyton Empire
King
 
monkspider's Avatar
 
Local Time: 20:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Wichita
Posts: 1,352
Good thoughts Lurker, I think that Expansionist does need a lot of work. Hopefully it will be addressed in the XP. The absolute main problem I have with it is once the game's intial turns are passed, you have nothing else to look forward to!
__________________
http://monkspider.blogspot.com/
monkspider is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 22:00   #19
Hurrying Heinz
Settler
 
Hurrying Heinz's Avatar
 
Local Time: 17:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: of the Gulag Archipelago
Posts: 10
Quote:
all units get +1 mp
all exploration and settlement units are 1/2 price.
all improvements which speed population growth are 1/2 price
all units treat enemy roads and RR's as friendly
all units ignore terrain effects on movement
The problem with number one is that then all of your units could retreat against units of the same age, which means that you would be invincible. (Yesss!! I am Invincible!)
Point 2 seems interesting because it is a characterist of expansionist civs to have many explorers/scouts and to found cities everywhere. 1/2 off settlers would be ok as long as its 1/2 its shield cost and not its pop cost.
Point 3,4 doesnt seem like an expansionist sorta thing. Dont know why
I think point 5 would be too unbalancing. Its too good.
Hurrying Heinz is offline  
Old June 3, 2002, 22:16   #20
punkbass2000
Civilization III MultiplayerCivilization III Democracy GameApolyton UniversityCivilization III PBEM
King
 
punkbass2000's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
Quote:
Originally posted by cyclotron7
I happen to like scientific... cheap libraries are great.

On another note, exactly how much does commercial actually do for corruption? It seems like anything battling corruption would be great, but what is the actual factor?
It increases your optimal number of cities by one (read: it does nothing). That's why I said it was on the verge of useless. I think it's funny how people have often gone on about how great it is with a Commercial civ, how they can have huge empire now and those outer cities produce more than one shield, etc. Alexman's study proved it does next to nothing for corruption, which just goes to show you how easily can find what they're looking for.
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
punkbass2000 is offline  
Old June 4, 2002, 10:30   #21
dunk
Prince
 
dunk's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 978
Commercial is good on smaller maps where an additional number to the Optimal Cities is a bigger deal.
dunk is offline  
Old June 4, 2002, 11:24   #22
statusperfect
King
 
statusperfect's Avatar
 
Local Time: 03:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,333
Quote:
Commercial is good on smaller maps where an additional number to the Optimal Cities is a bigger deal.
That does not make it more blanced. It's just another thing that should be changed. It should be relative to map size or maybe a % of you cities.
statusperfect is offline  
Old June 4, 2002, 18:45   #23
Random Passerby
Warlord
 
Local Time: 01:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 187
The best part of Commercial in my opinion is the starting tech: Alphabet is one of the most expensive baseline techs and gives you a wicked head start on the lucrative Writing branch. That's really its biggest advantage, and unfortunately that's not much; expansionist, for example, will on average net you most baseline techs pretty quickly (this is an average, mind you; if you're stuck on an island it won't do much at all, but if you've got a nice huge landmass with sparse competition it will often earn you the entire ancient era for free). Still, I think half price marketplaces/banks might be a bit much, especially if harbors and airports were added to that list as they likely would be; half price courthouses would be pretty balanced in my opinion, although it wouldn't be as intuitive.
Random Passerby is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:54.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team