|
View Poll Results: Should we have provincial governors?
|
|
Yes
|
|
26 |
50.98% |
No
|
|
25 |
49.02% |
|
June 15, 2002, 00:40
|
#31
|
King
Local Time: 21:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Sunshine State, USA
Posts: 1,104
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Trip
Remember people, things we decide now, will be implimented now. Do you really want governors running around
|
Why don't you just use your almighty "veto power" again if you disagree
And if you didn't feel it was a good idea, why did you start a poll on it?
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2002, 09:45
|
#32
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
|
THe problem with governors is that they take all power away from the city planner! If the cities are split into groups and the gover\nors each have one what will the CP do???
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.
"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2002, 09:54
|
#33
|
King
Local Time: 22:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Trip
*Tries to think of why so many people support governors.*
Remember people, things we decide now, will be implimented now. Do you really want governors running around when we only have 3 cities, but 4 times the number of Senators to run them?
|
Not necessarily. If we decide there are ten cities/province, then we won't have governors for quite some time, for example.
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2002, 09:59
|
#34
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
|
No, because the very first province will exist from the beginning.
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.
"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2002, 10:07
|
#35
|
King
Local Time: 22:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by civman2000
No, because the very first province will exist from the beginning.
|
Which is controlled by the City Planner
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2002, 10:19
|
#36
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
|
so in other words the city planner is no more than a governor...
TEchnically, we could end up not having governors: If the prez doesnt want to make any provinces AND the people don't post a poll to overrule him we will just have one big province !
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.
"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2002, 10:38
|
#37
|
King
Local Time: 22:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by civman2000
so in other words the city planner is no more than a governor...
TEchnically, we could end up not having governors: If the prez doesnt want to make any provinces AND the people don't post a poll to overrule him we will just have one big province !
|
To a certain extent, yes. However, the city planner has more authority than governor, is higher on the CoC, and has other responsibilities. If that Board (whatever it's called) materializes, the city planner would have a lot of say. Also, typically the first ten cities are the most important, and by the time they have been found the most important decisions have been made, IMO. Every choice made in the first 50 turns or so impacts the rest of the game exponentially. Also, the city planner will post polls for what to build in situations where there are many possibilities or objections to current build queues. In the long run, let's say we have 100 cities (pretty likely, considering map size), do you really want a single person making the build queues for all of them? It would be exhaustive, time-consuming work for one thing, and it was also be very unilateral, as the city planner would obviously not hold a poll for every build queue between every turnchat.
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
|
|
|
|
June 15, 2002, 11:14
|
#38
|
King
Local Time: 14:19
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,709
|
Dang! that's the closest poll I've ever seen.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:19.
|
|