July 5, 2002, 17:06
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 03:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kentucky USA
Posts: 388
|
Ancient Wars when enemy civs are far away (40+ squares). Still archer/sword rush?
What is best way to clear out your continent when ancient civs are far away and the continent is big?
In my current game as the chinese I was using a basic archer rush strategy. At 1200 bc I notice the indians and zulu are both real far away it seems indians are 30-40 squares away and zulu are 40-50. each have about 5 cities.
It seems it will take forever to get my archer and swordsmen up there. Is this a sound strategy?
I am the chinese btw in this game.
|
|
|
|
July 5, 2002, 19:25
|
#2
|
Local Time: 22:51
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: ACK!! PPHHHHTTBBBTTTT!!!
Posts: 7,022
|
If they are that far away you are better off building settlers and expanding until you get close to your neighbors.
Archer/Swordsman may not be your best bet.
__________________
"I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large out of focus monster roaming the countryside. Look out, he's fuzzy, let's get out of here."
|
|
|
|
July 5, 2002, 19:34
|
#3
|
Prince
Local Time: 03:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kentucky USA
Posts: 388
|
Every game they are always far away. At least when I play China. It seems my best bet is to expand and then wait until I get riders.
I guess the early archer rush, swordsman rush works for smaller maps or maybe european civs.
I play on large landmasses on standard maps. Maybe the european civs start closer together and asain civs far away. Or possibly by playing on large landmasses (but th emap is average/standard).
|
|
|
|
July 5, 2002, 20:15
|
#4
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
Posts: 4,223
|
You don't have to wait for Riders. A large amount of Horsemen will probably to the trick, as long as you can catch the AI before it gets Pikemen, which isn't easy.
You'll need more Horsemen than you would have needed Archers and Swords, but you can upgrade the survivors to Riders later on so they won't be wasted.
__________________
If I'm posting here then Counterglow must be down.
|
|
|
|
July 6, 2002, 01:54
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 21:51
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
|
China makes for a great "build first, fight later" nation when there's enough elbow room, especially if you're any good at out-researching the AIs on whatever level you play. I view Riders as one of the most potent UUs in the game (partly because my fighting style is so blitz-oriented), and what's even better is that the first time a Rider wins, you get a golden age to build more of them more quickly (assuming you didn't use your golden age earlier). Couple that with a tech lead, and a war that would have been a long, drawn-out slugging match earlier in the game can become a cakewalk.
Not that I have anything against using archers to cripple a neighbor early if one is close enough. But with plenty of room to expand and in the absence of juicy targets for archers, I'm inclined to think China is better off avoiding early wars.
Nathan
|
|
|
|
July 6, 2002, 02:24
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 04:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,131
|
40+ squares is just too far away for archers, and possibly for swordsmen (deity level they will probably have pikemen by the time you get your units over there to fight). I would do a horseman rush, upgrading to riders when you get the tech.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:51.
|
|