View Poll Results: What strategy do you use at the very start of a medium to high level difficulty game?
Loadsa settlers, hence small cities, hence large but poorly defended Civ 14 58.33%
Bit o both 4 16.67%
A small but very good and well defended Civ, with expansion plans for later 4 16.67%
Don't know, just do whatever. 1 4.17%
Banana. What is all that about? 1 4.17%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old July 14, 2002, 16:54   #1
joony
Settler
 
joony's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:19
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 23
Settlers at the start
At the very start of a game, what strategy do you use for expansion
joony is offline  
Old July 14, 2002, 17:22   #2
FrustratedPoet
PtWDG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
FrustratedPoet's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:19
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
Posts: 4,223
Large doesn't have to mean poorly defended. I always expand like crazy, but on medium to high difficulty levels you need a few defenders in each city just to stop it from going into anarchy so there will always be lots of spearmen around.
__________________
If I'm posting here then Counterglow must be down.
FrustratedPoet is offline  
Old July 14, 2002, 23:14   #3
nbarclay
PtWDG Gathering StormInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Emperor
 
nbarclay's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 6,676
Quote:
Originally posted by FrustratedPoet
Large doesn't have to mean poorly defended. I always expand like crazy, but on medium to high difficulty levels you need a few defenders in each city just to stop it from going into anarchy so there will always be lots of spearmen around.
Or crank up your luxury rate a few notches as needed. I've played on Emperor with most of my cities not having garrison troops in them for quite a while. Of course that starts running into problems past a certain distance, at which time I have to decide whether I want to use MPs or do something else with the cities (e.g. build workers to limit population growth or use an entertainer).

Most of the time, I like building a granary in my first city or two to get them really pumping out settlers. In a world without barbarians, that can be done at the very beginning. (On a standard map, I can prebuild something else while researching pottery at 100% if I don't start with it.) With barbarians around, trying a settler pump right off the bat is a lot riskier, although I've been known to do it anyhow. And I build few if any more military units than I consider necessary to provide some semblance of defense for my borders.

Another starting strategy I've been known to use is almost diametrically opposite to that one: the Archers Explore opening. That one is specific to civs that start with Warrior Code. The idea is to build a barracks first thing and then turn out archers in between settlers, using veteran archers instead of warriors for exploration. When the archers find a target, a group of them converge. (I usually try for about four to play it safe.) If all goes well, the rival capital is suddenly mine and I have a huge edge for the rest of the land grab. The down side to that strategy is that it only works if a suitable target is available; otherwise, a lot of early energy is wasted. By the way, in this opening, the ONLY goal is to capture the enemy capital (or maybe more than one enemy's capital if I have multiple targets in range). I don't count on having enough survivors to finish the rival off, and I want to settle into builder mode fairly quickly if the terrain allows for it. And besides, a weakened civ is really just building cities for me, whether it knows it or not.

Either way, my city build pattern is based on building lots of cities quickly, with the side effect that the cities stay relatively small until I start running out of room to expand. That (1) gives my eventual empire a large core to work from, (2) creates an illusion of power due to my size, (3) avoids "wasting" production on MPs, and (4) keeps me from having to push the luxury rate so high I don't have enough gold left for science. (On Monarch, where I've played most of my games, I'm generally quite willing to compete with the AIs as an active researcher even in the early game. On Emperor, a lot more depends on the game situation.)

Nathan
nbarclay is offline  
Old July 15, 2002, 07:43   #4
DaveV
Apolytoners Hall of Fame
King
 
DaveV's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:19
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: USA - EDT (GMT-5)
Posts: 2,051
I disagree with your assumption in the first poll choice. My ideal early city site will have a couple 2 food/2 shield squares to work, and will take 20 turns to grow to size 3. With 3 shields/turn at size 1 and 5 shields/turn at size 2, that's 80 shields, only 30 of which are needed for a settler. The other shields are spent on military units, to supress unrest and gain the respect of the AI civs (and eventually beat them up and take their lunch money). So it's entirely possible to expand at max speed while having a decent army, although it requires some scrimping on infrastructure.
DaveV is offline  
Old July 15, 2002, 08:31   #5
Colonial Impact
Settler
 
Colonial Impact's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Imperial German Colonies
Posts: 6
I prefer a small well defended civilization at the beginning. I try to settle on or near luxuries and gold. but also incorperate nbarclays strategy of vetran archers and such. I usually play with a militaristic civilization so that strategy comes to my advantage when I set out to conquer AI capitital cities. If there close I go for it if not fagedaboutit. My Empire quite small in the beginning but I plan my city placement for max shield and food production, buy technolgy from the AI, and produce a decent army to defend and fight the fatherland. By the Middle Ages I turn my hungry eyes to a nearby civilization that breathed the wrong way and "assimilate" them into my empire by any means and cost possible thus expanding by late game. I took control of a whole continental landmass of a huge map on monarch with a tank blitzcrieg from a small isolated and well defended pennisula similar to that of Florida. Being small and well defended in the beginning pays off in the end if you plan correctly.
__________________
Thru fire justice is served......
Colonial Impact is offline  
Old July 15, 2002, 09:23   #6
Cort Haus
PtWDG Gathering StormPtWDG2 Cake or Death?InterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamApolyton UniversityC4DG Gathering Storm
Deity
 
Cort Haus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:19
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London
Posts: 12,012
Peacemongers have to expand rapidly in the landgrab to race for what they won't be taking later (except by culture) - so settlers are a high priority.

With Egypt, a cheap, early temple between settler builds is a possibility, esp with favourable terrain (shielded grassland) which can be quickly developed with the industrious worker.

I balance this with spearmen to defend and warriors to explore, deal with barbs and bump the unit count to keep the AIs off my back. I check the F3 advisor regularly to see relative strengths.

The early culture pushes out your borders & allows profitable ROPs, reduces infiltration, improves the negotiating position, sets up culture bombing potential and can eliminate later flipping if warmongering.

After 4-5 cities I try to have a barracks city pumping out veteran defenders, and a wonder city is nice, but early wonders are tough on monarch and stunt growth.

I also try to buy workers from rivals to save crimping city growth - it's great to build roads out to distant sites, but every two workers costs a city.
Cort Haus is offline  
Old July 15, 2002, 10:09   #7
Papa Chubby
Warlord
 
Local Time: 04:19
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Iceland
Posts: 158
My preferred strategy is to pump out settlers and spread like the plague. It can mean that somebody catches you unaware, but you can usually stop them pretty quickly and then gain some land back. Also I usually go after and get the Pyramids, so the cities I´m building ain´t that small.
Papa Chubby is offline  
Old July 15, 2002, 15:25   #8
W4r_Machine
Warlord
 
W4r_Machine's Avatar
 
Local Time: 22:19
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: of Nothing! Canada, where the sun freezes
Posts: 140
On lower level, I go for the setler pump if the land is productive enough, if not, I just mine like there's no tommorow and pump out archers to go slave hunting while uncovering the fog of war.

At higher levels I'll take a much defensive approach since the AI will slap you arround into giving up your tech, map or cash(which ever comes first). I don't go exploring especially on prince cause if you have weak army the AI will go to war with you if you don't give them what they want, at least on my experience.(I figure, the less CIV I now, the less civ will bully me) I go for the pyramid in the capital while the rest of my city churn out archer or spearman.( I only have 4 or five city at this point) If I know I'm at par with the AI CIV I produce a few setlers so I can support more units.
__________________
Janitor, janitor
scrub in vein
for the $h1t house poet
have struck again
W4r_Machine is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:19.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team