July 21, 2002, 07:10
|
#1
|
|
King
Local Time: 06:43
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,333
|
Auto-Rush?
I believe Civ3 needs an Auto-Rush-Build option. It would be great not having to check all cities each turn when going for some despotic conquest. It would Autorush as soon as the city stops growing.
|
|
|
|
|
July 21, 2002, 21:20
|
#2
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 06:43
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Republic of Flanders
Posts: 10,747
|
 don't think so. could you even imagine what would happen if you let the city gov rush whenever he feels it's ok?!?!?!?  . No way!!
__________________
#There’s a city in my mind
Come along and take that ride
And it’s all right, baby, it’s all right #
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 22, 2002, 05:10
|
#3
|
|
King
Local Time: 06:43
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,333
|
what would happen??? i don't se any problems. just make the gov rush when the city reaches its max population
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 22, 2002, 06:17
|
#4
|
|
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
Local Time: 04:43
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by statusperfect
what would happen??? i don't se any problems. just make the gov rush when the city reaches its max population
|
I dont believe many people would find this nesisary or useful........
But if you like harming your citizens, try playing a game called Alpha Centauri....The thought of nerve stapling citizens can make you tingle with joy 
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 22, 2002, 09:46
|
#5
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:43
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 978
|
I wouldn't use this either. There's never a time where I would say, "Always rush when population reaches 6." Why would you so that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 22, 2002, 10:33
|
#6
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The cities of Orly and Nowai
Posts: 4,228
|
why? if you don't want it to grow any further, just balance the food production, and build workers/settlers when necessary...
__________________
B♭3
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 22, 2002, 13:34
|
#7
|
|
King
Local Time: 06:43
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,333
|
if it's useful or not depens on gaming style. i whip the hell out of my citizens as soon as i get a chance  but it seems like nobody else does. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 22, 2002, 15:57
|
#8
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:43
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 978
|
I don't want to deal with the unhappiness. Also, most of my size 6 cities are pretty productive, so it's not that big of a help.
I think having the governor always whip could be inefficient. I won't pop-rush unless I'm going to get the maximum amount of shields. If there's 5 shields to completion for a build, I'll just let it finish naturally. Your governor would use the whip for only 5 shields.
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 22, 2002, 16:21
|
#9
|
|
King
Local Time: 06:43
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,333
|
you have a point...
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 23, 2002, 09:21
|
#10
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:43
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: The cities of Orly and Nowai
Posts: 4,228
|
i mean, don't get me wrong, i rush a lot. but usually only once i get to republic or above, since i don't like losing population; why rush things in construction if the people can be used more productively elsewhere (i.e., infrastructure)?
but i can see reasoning. if you're next to water, sometimes you can't build those workers and settlers fast enough...
__________________
B♭3
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:43.
|
|
