|
View Poll Results: Do you agree with the plan ?
|
|
Yes
|
|
46 |
82.14% |
No
|
|
10 |
17.86% |
|
July 30, 2002, 11:23
|
#1
|
Local Time: 07:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
|
Official : Plan Gold
OPD had an idea which is currently being debated in this thread
The idea is about our preparation of war against the French :
- Apolyton should start building warriors, ca. 10.
- In the meantime, our workers connect Banana HQ to Ubergorsk and the iron East of it.
- We use our treasury to upgrade our warriors in Apolyton into swordsmen, once iron is connected. It will cost 40 gold per upgrade
- We use these swordsmen to attack France.
Question is : do you agree with the plan ?
Possible answers : Yes or No.
This poll will be closed in 3 days (Friday 2 August, 16:30 GMT)
Edit : added the cost of the upgrade
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 11:43
|
#2
|
Warlord
Local Time: 21:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 277
|
As I see it, there are only two problems with the plan:
1. Time. Will it take too long to come to fruition?
2. Money. We have enough, but is this the action that we want to spend it on?
We need to ask ourselves these two questions before voting.
Also, Sir Ralph, do you see any possible way to incorporate OPD's idea into a war with France? Or do you think that we will have to stick with archers and spearmen?
edit: Spiffor, as minister of the economy, do you feel this is a smart expenditure of money?
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 11:46
|
#3
|
Local Time: 07:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
|
I support the plan, because it allows us to have a terrific army in 20 turns, when the French will merely begin to buildup their military. The odds will be outstandingly in our favor, while they're les favourable now.
It also allows us to follow Uber's cunning strategy of disembarking units with galleys, because it gives us time to build galleys.
It's very possible to connect Iron to Apolyton in less than 20 years : it takes an industrious worker 5 turns to road jungle, meaning a 5 industrious stack will road a jungle tile each turn.
We have 3 workers from industrious Apolytonia already, and possibly 4 American workers, if we buy one from Abe this turn, for 28 gold. 4 American workers are as well as 2 Apolytonian workers, meaning our 3 Apolytonian + 4 American stackwill road a jungle tile each turn.
Such a stack can meet NW of Banana HQ in 3 turns.
It roads, 4 turns
Moves and roads N, 6
Moves and roads E, 8
Moves and roads E, 10
Moves and roads SE, 12
Moves and roads SE, 14
Moves to Hill E of Ubergorsk, 15
Roads hill (I don't know if it will take 1 or 2 turns).
Conclusion, if we rush to iron, we'll get it connected in no more than 17 turns, which is soon enough.
Now, to the gold problem : there is no gold problem. In 17 turns, we'll have 9 warriors ready in Apolyton (including the one currently defending). They'll cost 360 gold to upgrade, and we already have 509, and have a good cash flow (up to +17 gpt now).
In the meantime, we'll be able to buy 2 galleys in Termina, so that our swordsmen can be sent to French shores, as per Uber's plan.
And we'll still have our archer stack which will attack less protected cities like Orleans.
Except our troops will march on Paris in ca. 20 turns rather than 10, I don't see any flaw to the plan. And in REX phase, these 10 turns will not mean a major French military buildup.
I tried to prove here that it's a quick and unexpensive way to have an unbeatable army.
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 11:52
|
#4
|
Warlord
Local Time: 21:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 277
|
Makes sense to me, I'll vote for the plan. A good mix of common sense and planning ahead. I like it.
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 12:03
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 00:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,253
|
Sounds good. We should be able to attack America again immediately after (or even during) the war with the French.
__________________
"Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
"At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
"Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
"In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 12:04
|
#6
|
Local Time: 07:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
|
Don't forget we must wait 20 turns before declaring war to the Yanks, if we don't want our reputation to suffer badly.
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 12:05
|
#7
|
Deity
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
*sigh*
Manually add +1 to YES
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 12:06
|
#8
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of Bananas
Posts: 998
|
I like it because it allows our less developed cities to build improvements, while we build an able fighting force. Due to our current city size limitations by unhappiness, clearing the jungle at this time is not a major priorty. However once our workers reach Uber[insert the sound of a squished bug] they can clean up that city's territory, which currently has only one good square... the city :P
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 12:10
|
#9
|
Emperor
Local Time: 00:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,253
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Spiffor
Don't forget we must wait 20 turns before declaring war to the Yanks, if we don't want our reputation to suffer badly.
|
Doesn't it take 20 turns just to build 10 warriors though?
__________________
"Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
"At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
"Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
"In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 12:16
|
#10
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Commonwealth of Commonsense
Posts: 608
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Epistax
... once our workers reach Uber[insert the sound of a squished bug] they can clean up that city's territory, which currently has only one good square... the city :P
|
I like this aspect of the plan, as building up this city represents the best way to counter the presence of Munich to the north.
In order to make this plan work, we have to create connected infrastructure and keep it open. That will be a major challenge (at least, until/if we secure French sources of iron). If the Germans put a substantial effort into building up Munich, it will grow territorial borders south, and cut off our road. We need to buttress Uberkorsk culturally and in terms of population, hopefully enough to flip Munich.
(Ironic, ain't it, that the city named for Uber will need to establish a strong culture in order to fulfill its key strategic role. )
Personally, I favor building up a horse army. More time consuming, but a lot more flexible (offence/defense, spread up and down the length of our growing territory; and in terms of eventual upgrade).
Still, if we run careful numbers, and this seems to be workable ....
__________________
aka, Unique Unit
Wielder of Weapons of Mass Distraction
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 13:57
|
#11
|
Deity
Local Time: 07:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 13,800
|
I support the plan. But I think it would be wise to not attack the Americans during the war, after all, history have showed us that a two front war is never a optimal situation.
__________________
Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God. -Isaiah 41:10
The LORD your God is with you, he is mighty to save. He will take great delight in you, he will quiet you with his love, he will rejoice over you with singing. - Zephaniah 3:17
Get The List for cIV here!
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 14:34
|
#12
|
Warlord
Local Time: 21:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: California
Posts: 194
|
Good plan, but let's improve Apolyton a bit and consolidate our new territory.
__________________
Est-ce que tu as vu une baleine avec un queue taché?
If you don't feel the slightist bit joyful seeing the Iraqis dancing in the street, then you are lost to the radical left. If you don't feel the slightest bit bad that we had to use force to do this, then you are lost to the radical right.
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 14:46
|
#13
|
Deity
Local Time: 23:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: of naught
Posts: 21,300
|
The makings of a good plan. 9 or 10 sword with our Archers backing them up would be more than enough for France.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 17:51
|
#14
|
Warlord
Local Time: 05:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 243
|
The financial cost is severe, but there may be a chance to build some setlers since we don't need ALL of our cities to be producing do we? We need to expand to some sites in this thread: http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...threadid=57368
otherwise, I support this plan, very cunning!
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 18:00
|
#15
|
Local Time: 07:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
|
We are currently building 2 settlers, in Banana HQ and Tassagrad. I don't know where we'll be able to build the next one though.
__________________
"I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
"I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
"I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 18:03
|
#16
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,551
|
I support as long as we do not forget to build up our own territory as a priority. Also, before we march, we need to have some clear objectives. Very clear. Such as, stop when we get the wine, or stop after the last man falls. Either way - as long as we have a clearly defined start and end point.....
__________________
Try peace first. If that does not work, then killing them is often a good solution. :evil:
As long as I could figure a way to hump myself, I would be OK with that
--Con
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 18:09
|
#17
|
King
Local Time: 23:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Toasty!
Posts: 2,230
|
We do. Our plan is to go after Paris and Orleans, as per Uber's plan, then when the Frenchies sue for peace, ask for Rheims and Chartres as part of the deal. If they refuse, take Rheims and Chartres, then see what we can get (namely, Marseilles). We're also after a leader (for Forbidden Palace) and some elite units.
Here's the war plan.
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 19:23
|
#18
|
Civ4: Colonization Content Editor
Local Time: 06:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,117
|
I was against this plan at first, because I thought it slows us down too much. But after carefully considering the situation, I approve it. Yes from me.
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 20:19
|
#19
|
King
Local Time: 00:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Of GOW's half of BOB
Posts: 1,847
|
I too was against this idea for the initial war with france. However, it does seem that it is a good idea. So add me to the converted list. Though I do say, due to the longer prep time, we try to secure at least 3 cities by force before peace talks. Good job OPD .
Aggie
__________________
The 5th President, 2nd SMC and 8th VP in the Civ3 Demogame. Also proud member of the GOW team in the PTW game. Peace through superior firepower.
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 23:00
|
#20
|
Prince
Local Time: 23:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Posts: 884
|
I've converted too. I wanted to focus on infrastructure, but this is a good idea, and we will be able to knock down another apponent and gain more territory and citizens.
|
|
|
|
July 30, 2002, 23:21
|
#21
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MN,USA
Posts: 967
|
__________________
“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
If he did he's an idiot and deserved to die. But I doubt it. -- Theben on Whoha's attack in Society 8.
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 01:07
|
#22
|
Emperor
Local Time: 00:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: flying too low to the ground
Posts: 4,625
|
i'm voting yes, although i dislike the dead endedness of this plan (swordsmen don't upgrade).
After the wars with France and America, we may just use them as Garrisons
__________________
"I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 01:19
|
#23
|
Deity
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: That's DR WhereItsAt...
Posts: 10,157
|
YES! Time to easily triple our strength.
Swordsmen don't upgrade, but they would make good garrisons. And we shouldn't stop planning wars until we are big enough to not have to worry about not being able to upgrade Swordsmen.
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 03:31
|
#24
|
Civ4: Colonization Content Editor
Local Time: 06:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,117
|
Swordsmen are lousy garrisons, because they don't upgrade. I suggest to replace them ASAP. Let them fill up our army and die out in the battles to come, after their time was gone.
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 04:52
|
#25
|
King
Local Time: 07:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 1,005
|
-Or we can keep them until they're no longer needed, then disband them and get some of the shields back. (When a unit is disbanded inside a city, a quarter of the shields it took to build that unit is returned to the city and goes straight into the current build project.)
Anyway, I approve the plan, even though I normally don't like swordsmen all that much...
I prefer knights, which are faster and stronger and can be upgraded to cavalry when the time comes. However, in this case, waiting for them to become available would leave us sitting on our butts for way too long, which is actually a lot worse than having a few units that can't be upgraded. Besides, once you get to cavalry, you're at a dead end anyway, so it's all give and take, I suppose. We need units that can hit hard in 20 turns from now, and at that the swordsmen are the best we can get. So, get the swords and grab us another couple of quick and decisive victories. We can build more advanced units later on, when we more land and a better infrastructure to support them.
__________________
"Politics is to say you are going to do one thing while you're actually planning to do someting else - and then you do neither."
-- Saddam Hussein
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 04:59
|
#26
|
Prince
Local Time: 23:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Posts: 884
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Swordsmen are lousy garrisons, because they don't upgrade. I suggest to replace them ASAP. Let them fill up our army and die out in the battles to come, after their time was gone.
|
They may not be the best garrisons, but they could work until we could dsband them and replace them with musketman. I dont think that ot would be to hard.
Kman
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 12:06
|
#27
|
Warlord
Local Time: 21:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Posts: 277
|
Do we really need 10 swordsmen? If you ask me half that many are more than enough. That way we save money and time spent on producing warriors, that way we can start upgrading our cities.
edit: Don't forget, we have 5 archers who can help, and they don't advance beyond longbowmen. So losing them and the swordsmen now won't be the end of the world.
__________________
2nd Minister of the Economy in the 1st Apolytonia Civ 3 Democracy Game.
Founder and editor of the Berserker Bugle
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 12:24
|
#28
|
Deity
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
Five Swordsmen doesn't give us enough of a safety margin. With ten, victory is assured.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 12:25
|
#29
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:11
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: of the Big Apple
Posts: 4,109
|
Well, since war with France appears to have been chosen aready, this is by far the most interesting , original plan, which also gives us space for domestic improvements and growth: a very nice balance overall and a good foundation for the future. great job OPD.
__________________
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake :(
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2002, 13:07
|
#30
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,551
|
Thanks Vlad.
__________________
Try peace first. If that does not work, then killing them is often a good solution. :evil:
As long as I could figure a way to hump myself, I would be OK with that
--Con
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11.
|
|