Do we want a Court ?

Pandemoniak · August 25, 2002, 16:23

Its currently discussed whether we need a court or not.
Please click here to read more about it.

The poll will last 5 days.

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 16:26

I would click there if i could

EDIT:

And now i can

Pandemoniak · August 25, 2002, 16:28

Post edited, sorry DBTS, I had to go to the toilets before I edit it

Method · August 25, 2002, 16:30

pleasant...

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 16:30

No! We don't need a court right now as we are not of sufficent size and there is no reason for a court to exist.

Let the people decide! This is a democracy!!

Pandemoniak · August 25, 2002, 16:32

Every democracy has an independant Court, Tassadar. And this is a tool for updating constitution faster. It has only the power to decide a poll is needed.

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 16:34

I want to put myself for as first term judge (i like tampering with the constitution and i am a busy CC member)

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 16:35

Quote:

Originally posted by Pandemoniak
Every democracy has an independant Court, Tassadar. And this is a tool for updating constitution faster. It has only the power to decide a poll is needed.

IMO, courts simpy give certain citizens more power. Plus, its just more beuocracy (sp)

I dont think there is sufficent reason for a court to be created at this time.

Pandemoniak · August 25, 2002, 16:36

DBTS, this would make you independant of any party, and you'll have to behave as an independant.
I trust you though

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 16:39

i would ofcourse in court act as in independent but i dont think it will be so much person vs. person but more we need some one that will break the standoff and that is where the judge comes in

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 16:40

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
i would ofcourse in court act as in independent but i dont think it will be so much person vs. person but more we need some one that will break the standoff and that is where the judge comes in

No.....The people as a whole can intervene. There is no need for a court....It simpy gives people more power and causes beurcracy (sp)

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 16:43

wel heck then just dont have any commissioner or director causes beurcracy

Anodyne · August 25, 2002, 16:44

Hmm. I might agree with Tass here.

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 16:45

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
wel heck then just dont have any commissioner or director causes beurcracy

But they are ESSENTIAL to the demo game. A court isnt.

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 16:50

MAYBE it is how are you to decide what is essential and isnt let the people make there own descion without propagande from the people against and for the proposal

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 16:52

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
MAYBE it is how are you to decide what is essential and isnt let the people make there own descion without propagande from the people against and for the proposal

Hey, this is a democracy. Am I not alllowed to voice my opinion?

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 16:53

yes ofcource but with you it always has that propaganda smell on it.

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 16:54

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
yes ofcource but with you it always has that propaganda smell on it.

*Sigh*

Back on topic....We dont need a court. Pretty much serves the same functino as the people while promoting certain citizens to "judge" status and giving them more power WHILE stripping power away from the people....

Not good

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 16:57

yes but I dont like the idea of just anyone without a good an legal reson start a impeachment process and when something is not clear in the constitution do we have to freeze the game for atleast 3 days to let everone vote on it...well that is time consuming...

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 17:00

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
yes but I dont like the idea of just anyone without a good an legal reson start a impeachment process and when something is not clear in the constitution do we have to freeze the game for atleast 3 days to let everone vote on it...well that is time consuming...

We dont have to freeze anything during an impeachment process. All we do is let the demo game continue. Its that simple.

And with a court, there would just be more to deal with....Because only certain people are the ones who decide whether its valid or not or whatever.....Again, let's let the people decide.

Anodyne · August 25, 2002, 17:00

We might have a "Supreme Judge" (or a council of 3-5), who would decide what is a case of impeachment and what is not. But the final call would still be at the hands of the people.

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 17:03

ade: that the idea. first a jugde penal to validate the progress and then let the people vote this way you wouldnt be swampt with stupid impeachment polls

tass: i dont mean impeachment it dosnt have to be frozen but when during the game too directors claim a unit or a screen or stuff and then we would have to freeze the game for a poll

do you see my meaning

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 17:05

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
tass: i dont mean impeachment it dosnt have to be frozen but when during the game too directors claim a unit or a screen or stuff and then we would have to freeze the game for a poll

do you see my meaning

That would happen with or without a court....If they claim control over a unit, the formation of a court would not be able to dismiss the claim and the game would still have to freeze.

That is why we need a clear consitituon over what positions can do what.

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 17:07

but a court would be able to do it faster then all the people within one day if we are lucking and it doesnt matter how clear the consitution will be some think always comes up

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 17:08

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
but a court would be able to do it faster then all the people within one day if we are lucking and it doesnt matter how clear the consitution will be some think always comes up

Actually, the court may be even slower because of procedures it must follow and the beuocracy and someone contesting the decision and claiming the court is biased and....

I say its just better to let the people decide.

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 17:11

yes ofcourse if you use DGcivIII court but a quicker jugding system with three jugdes hearing one speach from both parties coming to a descion could be done quickly

i think

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 17:12

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
yes ofcourse if you use DGcivIII court but a quicker jugding system with three jugdes hearing one speach from both parties coming to a descion could be done quickly

i think

and the people simply voting on the matter would be even faster because there is no garentee that the three judges will be online...However the people are ALWAYS online

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 17:14

NO thats not correct the constitution states (or will be stating) that every 'official' poll must be open for atleast 3 days.

and about not being online active members are (wel atleast i am) online every day. so within a max. of 2 day a descission will be made

Nubclear · August 25, 2002, 17:17

Quote:

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
NO thats not correct the constitution states (or will be stating) that every 'official' poll must be open for atleast 3 days.

Yes, and thats pretty good.

Quote:

and about not being online active members are (wel atleast i am) online every day. so within a max. of 2 day a descission will be made

2 day discussion and how many days until the verdict comes out? One day? Then it would simply equal out to three days...

And also we have the issue of Party Politics we need to adress. I personally wouldnt want any one party controlling the court.

So far the court is not needed and will simply post more problems then needed.

DeathByTheSword · August 25, 2002, 17:20

the verdict is the end of the discussion. (but that in my english sorry for the misunderstanding) i believe within 2 days there can be a verdict and a court hasnt been needed because WE HAVENT STARTED YET

and i hope it will never be needed but it could always be handy and no parties in a court ofcource