September 11, 2002, 20:42
|
#31
|
King
Local Time: 15:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,515
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Goingonit
BTW, what's the max. number of units you can have? I have 600 and I've only done about 2/3 of NATO forces...
|
I read 2048 somewhere ...
Can't confirm that though.
|
|
|
|
September 12, 2002, 07:00
|
#33
|
Warlord
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Posts: 192
|
Yes, I found both of those orbats very useful, and they're my guides for unit placement. They're giant!
__________________
I refute it thus!
"Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"
|
|
|
|
September 12, 2002, 07:41
|
#34
|
Emperor
Local Time: 17:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,057
|
What does each unit represent? If you've placed 600, am I correct in guessing that you're attempting to represent NATO at a battalion level?
If so, for play concerns you should consider changing this to brigade or half a brigade level - 600 units is really way too many units to move in one turn, and it will take ages for the AI to move that many units.
__________________
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
|
|
|
|
September 12, 2002, 10:37
|
#35
|
Warlord
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Posts: 192
|
Yes, I've tried roughly batallion level (more like half-brigade or brigade for artillery and air defense, but adding auxilliary units such as antitank infantry for mehanized brigades)
I'm definitely going to thin out NATO considerably - maybe remove 1/2 of all units. Especially since the Warsaw Pact has more units than NATO does, the 2048 limit would almost certainly be reached in the course of a scenario.
__________________
I refute it thus!
"Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 03:43
|
#36
|
King
Local Time: 08:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dilbert
Posts: 1,839
|
To avoid this, you could use the solution that I was implementing in my Red Storm scenario: NATO forces are represented at battalion level, but Soviet forces are represented a division level. This will allow you to considerably lower the number of units required to accurately represent the Warsaw Pact forces and also give you an excuse to make them more powerful and therefore create a more challenging game for the player.
|
|
|
|
September 15, 2002, 22:00
|
#37
|
Warlord
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Posts: 192
|
*BUMP*
And a response:
There are too many NATO units for the player to reasonably move at battalion level! With ~500 combat-ready batallions from England, Germany, and the USA in Europe (and more on the way), not to mention France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark, that's a helluva lot. I'm representing them both at 2 battalions per unit, with a 2194-days-style set of different rules depending on the human player.
I've got Germany, US ans UK down to 334 units, add the rest and that's maybe a total of 450. Add Warsaw Pact, that makes ~1100 units at the start of the game. To contrast, Red Front has about 1800. So this is still a veeeery large scenario (remember that in Red Front, the Germans had way more units and weren't human-controlled), but more manageable than what it was (i.e. 75% more units).
__________________
I refute it thus!
"Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 01:58
|
#38
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mm, sure could go for a hot dog right now
Posts: 562
|
I repeat my question, will there be any naval battles what so ever?
__________________
Yeah, Moe, that team sure did suck last night. They just plain sucked! I've seen teams suck before, but they were the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked.
-Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 12:52
|
#39
|
Warlord
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Posts: 192
|
Yes, there will be! Sub, surface, and naval air forces will be portrayed.
__________________
I refute it thus!
"Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 14:32
|
#40
|
Warlord
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Posts: 192
|
I just changed the city style (to Nemo's modern city with a few changes) and the Urban terrain graphic (to Nemo-style buildings). I also eliminated the grassland resource graphic, and changed the window background thingy. Tell me what you think.
__________________
I refute it thus!
"Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 15:01
|
#41
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mm, sure could go for a hot dog right now
Posts: 562
|
Looks much better. Just two things, the countryside still looks pretty boring and I think a new airbase graphic would be nice.
How about some of that harvester and some hills?
You're pretty tired of me by now, eh?
__________________
Yeah, Moe, that team sure did suck last night. They just plain sucked! I've seen teams suck before, but they were the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked.
-Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 15:27
|
#42
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of Cartographers
Posts: 752
|
How about these Airbase Graphics, i dont know who did them, i wasnt me though
But yes i agree with pavlov, the terrain needs a bit livening up, have special terrain like farms or such, ill post a few ideas when i find them
__________________
Maps, Maps, MORE MAPS!!!!
"You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs but it's amazing how many eggs you can break without making a decent omelette"
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 15:33
|
#43
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: of Cartographers
Posts: 752
|
Ok, i found them rather quick  also you might want to use the mining graphic on this, more modern  Again i stole shamelessly, but i dont know where from 
Use what you want, kill the rest
__________________
Maps, Maps, MORE MAPS!!!!
"You can't make an omelette without breaking eggs but it's amazing how many eggs you can break without making a decent omelette"
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 15:42
|
#44
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mm, sure could go for a hot dog right now
Posts: 562
|
I think the airbase that Grothgar shows would be nice.
Some of those terrain thingys are Nemo's. I suggest using the papermill, the mansion and that little shed looking house.
Just my 0.02 kronor.
__________________
Yeah, Moe, that team sure did suck last night. They just plain sucked! I've seen teams suck before, but they were the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked.
-Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 15:49
|
#45
|
Warlord
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Posts: 192
|
I tried the havester, but it didn't look good.
And the countryside is boring.  There aren't any hills in the Netherlands, either.
But I did make a new airbase graphic.
__________________
I refute it thus!
"Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 15:55
|
#46
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mm, sure could go for a hot dog right now
Posts: 562
|
That is a nice airbase, but I fear it will look too small. Why don't you have a look at that airbase Grothgar showed?  That harvester would look a bit monstrous on your map but how about a small house then?
Another thing: How close will this scen follow the book?
__________________
Yeah, Moe, that team sure did suck last night. They just plain sucked! I've seen teams suck before, but they were the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked.
-Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 15:57
|
#47
|
Warlord
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Posts: 192
|
Thanks, Grothgar. I didn't see your airbase before I posted it, but I'm using it now. It's a modified Nemo graphic.
__________________
I refute it thus!
"Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"
|
|
|
|
September 16, 2002, 17:21
|
#48
|
Local Time: 02:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,135
|
i assume that your making the scenario for people to play as Nato? because otherwise the AI would botch it with the f-19 with no movement during the day, it would also mess up if you made the HP/firepower/attack low during the day as well
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41.
|
|