Eu3 Wishlist

XarXo · September 9, 2002, 09:42

Ok, let's go Apolyton CS! Show to the world our mind power:

Ideas:

Complete map: Possibility to explore ALL the world map, including Antarctica

. Add an exploration difficult level for terrains that in a specific year aren't discovered yet. Specially difficult with inhuman conditions like arctic and similar.

North/South pole crossing posssibility.

Possibility to change the capitol place without wait an event.

3D map, with REAL region borders.

Name region accurancy: Gerona -> Empurdà, Roussillon -> Rosselló, etc...

Oerdin · September 10, 2002, 00:12

I like the donut map option but I don't want to wait for EU3. Do you think there will be an expansion pack?

Heresson · September 10, 2002, 05:30

I think cultures should be changed. What they did in central and eastern Europe is just horrible.
Changing capital and conversion of culture,
F.e. after being in your state for 300 years, a religion or culture changes automatically
I don't like the tolerance thing in EU2 as a concept; You don't have to be tolerantial to just some of religions, sometimes You can tolerate them all.
Also, if You conquer all state You should be able to anect it all and all this capital stuff is dumb.
Annexion os vassals of other religions should be possible.
The game can start earlier and end later...

Main_Brain · September 10, 2002, 06:03

I hate it when a country has 2 provinces and thereforecant be annexyed right away so I wholeheartly agree but only if the courntry is small (less than 6provs)

Maniac · September 10, 2002, 06:56

Quote:

Originally posted by Heresson
You don't have to be tolerantial to just some of religions, sometimes You can tolerate them all.

Sure you can. "Tolerating but not actively supporting" all religions is represented by setting all your tolerance sliders in the middle value. However you can't actively support many religions, thus you can't put them all at the maximum tolerance value.

Heresson · September 10, 2002, 08:23

I mean, You should be able to do that in fact - You can in the real life.

Shadowstrike · September 10, 2002, 20:22

Completely editable map, with a zillion tags and ability to change more then (the almost everything) allowed now would be nice. Of course I just like to drool at scenario capabilities, I never get around to using them.

Jer8m8 · September 10, 2002, 20:42

Names can be changed on map i think pretty easily.

Extension to 1914 (include AON)

More troop types

Better system of trading/transporting goods

More diplomatic/peace options

more countries-being able to grant anyone of a more detailed province independent

being able to cede/sell/trade provinces in peace

Make terrain more important

Explorers/conquistadors-you don't gain knowledge of there voyage until they return to one of your provinces

Main_Brain · September 11, 2002, 07:18

I wished I could build Govs/manufacturies/Channelors etc. direvtly through the Archiv

I mean I can sort those countries where I to see which have no Marshalls but It would be nice to directly build the Mars. there

Havard · September 11, 2002, 08:41

The main problem with such a list, though, is that there exist no plans whatsoever of DOING EU3.

Apart from that I'm sure most of the improvements listed above will be considered. I wouldn't count on seeing them all implemented though, as some of them was purposely not incuded in EU2...

DarkCloud · September 11, 2002, 22:24

Map Editor

-
No plans existed for Civ III either

And EU III would sell

SO perhaps in the future...

DarkCloud · September 11, 2002, 22:26

Quote:

Extension to 1914 (include AON)

I seem to remember them saying on the EU fora that they cannot correctly model modern warfare- even that of 1914. I woudl think that a more realistic model might possibly go to 1898 and the Span-American war or perhaps Sakhalin Island- but after that you have tanks... The 20th century might screw up EU's whole system, sadly.

Carolus_Rex · September 12, 2002, 15:57

On the polar circle crossing thing...if u think of the current scope of EU2, u'd have less chance than a snowball in hell to cross...which would make it pretty damn pointless to have them crossable.

Same goes with many other provinces now covered by the PTI. Why have space where ur troops die within a month?

Jer8m8 · September 12, 2002, 17:33

On PTi, my biggest issue is that Mongolia was populated, Western Australia settled and the Great Plains discovered and could have potentially been settled within the time frame. Also, Siberia should be a little bigger. In all other areas, I think there should be large provinces solely for movement. I'd also like the mpa to be larger north and south-Antarctic coastine near South America, some more pacific islands, more of new Zealand, some provinces on Baffin Island-the Northwest passage *should* be open, but super high attrition and ice all year round past a certain point. I'd also like Svalbard, cause it sounds cool

O, and BTW, a scenario with a map containing an Atlantis in the Middle of the Atlantic would also be nice...

DarkCloud · September 12, 2002, 19:07

Jer8m8 that atlantis scenario could all be solved with a map editor

Paradox should make the next game more open- I own EUI but see no reason to upgrade since EU II, i think, doesn't have a map editor

We should be able to modify the game easier

-

Jer8m8 · September 12, 2002, 20:48

Nah I never played EU 1. Saw an ad for EU2 (probably on this site), stopped playing civ 3, and have been hooked since. I have no editing skills, but I too would love a scenario editor

Havard · September 13, 2002, 04:26

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkCloud
Jer8m8 that atlantis scenario could all be solved with a map editor

Paradox should make the next game more open- I own EUI but see no reason to upgrade since EU II, i think, doesn't have a map editor

We should be able to modify the game easier

???

Just about the only thing you cannot change is the map. How is that not open?

And IMO you are missing a lot by not upgrading to EU2.

XarXo · September 13, 2002, 10:22

Quote:

Originally posted by Jer8m8
O, and BTW, a scenario with a map containing an Atlantis in the Middle of the Atlantic would also be nice...

Hey! Great Idea!

From Civ II to now I haven't found new maps and scenarios including Atlantis or Mu.

dojoboy · September 13, 2002, 21:36

Quote:

Originally posted by Jer8m8
Nah I never played EU 1. Saw an ad for EU2 (probably on this site), stopped playing civ 3, and have been hooked since. I have no editing skills, but I too would love a scenario editor

This may be my fate. The Mac version of EU2 is due out before Christmas, by Virtual Programming. I can't wait, heard and read great things.

XarXo · September 26, 2002, 16:00

No more ideas? People! That WE ARE APOLYTON!

Heresson · September 26, 2002, 16:33

I have one idea. Hire me, pay me a lot of money, and then I'll think about it.

Dauphin · September 26, 2002, 17:21

No set limit on the size of an alliance would be good. But some counter force would be needed to ensure no-one makes one huge unholy alliance of over 10 nations.

Perhaps say that if relations between any two member nations in an alliance is negative then one will choose to leave the alliance, probably the one that has worse relations with you.

Sandman · September 28, 2002, 09:44

A revamped trade system would be nice, including trade routes and 'minor' and 'major' centres of trade.

Heresson · September 28, 2002, 10:04

Also You should be able to build thyem and could destroy them.*-

Dauphin · September 28, 2002, 10:14

You can't force a centre of trade in reality, but your geography economy and politic make them more likely. They should really remain pseudo-random in that respect.