September 13, 2002, 05:41
|
#1
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United Kingdom EX New Zealand
Posts: 118
|
Effects Of Nuclear Weapons
Can anybody tell me about the effects of Nukes in CIV3
I don't usually use Nukes in a civ 3 war for all the obvious reasons, but i have already one the game and wanted to take out the annoying french and english in style.
I built 15 or so ICBMs and a whole bunch of boomers with tac nukes (god its anooying you can only load 1 nuke on a sub) two transports full of elite MA.
I nuked the respective civs back to the stone age (after landing my armour) one nuke in every city, and prepared to waltz through the continent but!!!!!!!! i found much reduced cities with garrison intact, some we not even wounded what the hell goes on! I have also met alot of resistance to forge a further beachhead i nuked a large concentration of enemy MA i came across hoping to destroy their army in one go... what happened sweet FA!!
Can somebody explain exactly what use CIV3 nukes are apart from creating large amounts of polution and halving city pops??.
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 06:59
|
#2
|
King
Local Time: 09:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yuggoth
Posts: 1,987
|
Every Unit at Ground Zero and all adjacent Tiles of a Nuke has a Chance of 50% of dying.
I think all surviving Units are unaffected and don´t lose even one HP, but I am not sure about this.
__________________
Applications programming is a race between software engineers, who strive to produce idiot-proof programs, and the Universe which strives to produce bigger idiots. - software engineers' saying
So far, the Universe is winning.
- applications programmers' saying
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 07:00
|
#3
|
King
Local Time: 02:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Right down the road
Posts: 2,321
|
Every unit and building has a 50-50 chance of dying outright. In addition, those surviving units take a lethal bombardment (I'm not sure on the exact numbers here, but from my experience (unlike you I use them regularly in most games) they seem to take out about 80% of defenders). When in doubt, drop 2. Also always do their capital and any good resource squares so that they can't rebuild.
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 07:05
|
#4
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United Kingdom EX New Zealand
Posts: 118
|
I figured out they are probably better for stunting over all growth like removing key rail/luxury and resource improvements.
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 09:01
|
#6
|
Warlord
Local Time: 07:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United Kingdom EX New Zealand
Posts: 118
|
I saw that last week Miccofl!!, i was trying to emulate the same result but was very surprised to see Joan still had forces left...alot left as it turned out.
What happened to the the good old nuking of an enemys navy i used to be able to take out most of an AI's navy in one turn :-(
__________________
If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected - SunTzu
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 10:27
|
#7
|
Warlord
Local Time: 23:54
Local Date: October 31, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Terminal Island
Posts: 181
|
That was the only time I used nukes in Civ2. Every carrier had at least 2 on board.
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 11:52
|
#8
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 07:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 83
|
Does anyone know if the effects of nuclear weapons are editable?
I think the current effects are too minor, and want to increase them.
I'm not just doing this because I want to waltz over the AI, either. I already do that. Part of it is because, on those highly limited occasions where I can induce the AI to use a nuke against me, it always ends up having next to no impact on the overall situation. I want these guys to be able to fry me.
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 16:43
|
#9
|
Prince
Local Time: 02:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Micco, FL
Posts: 811
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by: Lucarse
i was trying to emulate the same result but was very surprised to see Joan still had forces left...alot left as it turned out.
|
It took 42 nukes to wipe out all of her forces so that means an average of over 4 per city. One nuke will not wipe out a large stack of units, and did you notice that ironclad - weak, but still floating? (SW corner) Have you ever heard of "test Able" and "test Baker?" They were the A-bomb tests done after WW2 using the old and captured ships from the war. Able was a surface detonation and many ships survived, Baker was detonated under water and very few ships survived. Perhaps the people who set up this portion of the game had this in mind when they made the nukes so unpredictable. It's either that or they just screwed up because nukes are uneditable as far as power goes.
|
|
|
|
September 13, 2002, 18:38
|
#10
|
Prince
Local Time: 01:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 416
|
Has it been sais by anybody if there going to fix the obvious problems with Civ3 nukes? (we need middle range nukes!
|
|
|
|
September 14, 2002, 10:23
|
#11
|
Warlord
Local Time: 03:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 169
|
The secret is surviving the first strike. They usually move in with heavy ground forces to wipe out your cities afterwards. They attack your capital with four or five ICBMs to get through air defense. The Navy is a little slow in this game, but they are great in a nuclear war because you always need some nuclear punch later in the war game. You also need a lot of workers, and good maps to slow their production. Also, if the whole world is at war, you have a better chance of victory.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54.
|
|