RAH Rules: The Continuing Evolution - Page 4

rah · December 21, 2002, 20:12

Lacking any serious objections, Cold, please feel free to add that using the Hut Finder software is considered legal as long as it's done during other's turn.

RAH

ColdWizard · December 23, 2002, 10:18

i already did

rah · December 23, 2002, 11:14

Hmm, i guess I should have checked.

Thanks.

Rich

War4ever · December 23, 2002, 16:41

well done Coldwizard, always on top of things..as long as its not an actual game

ColdWizard · December 23, 2002, 17:17

remind me to yell peace and backstab you a few turns later

DrSpike · December 23, 2002, 17:54

I have a feeling next time he wont be so easy to fool.

Ming · December 23, 2002, 18:15

Oh... I'm sure War will continue to show honor to those that have been honorable in the past

Needless to say, that doesn't include FF

Flatlander Fox · December 23, 2002, 18:55

Jeez, you guys are ruining my ability to beg for mercy.

Knock it off!

War4ever · December 23, 2002, 19:21

Quote:

Originally posted by Ming
Oh... I'm sure War will continue to show honor to those that have been honorable in the past

Needless to say, that doesn't include FF

Ming has more tolerance than me......see if FF had nuked ME in a game, i would be right pissed....

needless to say

btw, Ming has shown great strength by not being angry at me the day i nuked everyone (except rah) though his was coming too

perhaps it was due to the fact that although i gained cities, i think i lost more troops than everyone combined by my attacks

its water under the bridge right Ming

rah · December 23, 2002, 22:20

[QUOTE] Originally posted by War4ever
btw, Ming has shown great strength by not being angry at me the day i nuked everyone (except rah) though his was coming too

/QUOTE]

And that's what motivated me to do the backstab. I had to get laser from you prior to the fun.. I succeeded.

War4ever · December 23, 2002, 23:27

[QUOTE] Originally posted by rah

Quote:

Originally posted by War4ever

/QUOTE]

And that's what motivated me to do the backstab. I had to get laser from you prior to the fun.. I succeeded.

and you know what....that was legit....had you screamed peace first

i would have nuked you anyways

rah · December 24, 2002, 14:38

Yes you would have.

I just figured your nuking them was payback for all the laughing they were doing while I was trashing your cities earlier.

Ming, "What's taking RAH so long this turn" ..... He's taking down a slew of War4's cities........... Ming, "No problem, I'll have a smoke or two or three, hahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahaha"

War4ever · December 24, 2002, 17:44

Quote:

Originally posted by rah
Yes you would have.

I just figured your nuking them was payback for all the laughing they were doing while I was trashing your cities earlier.

Ming, "What's taking RAH so long this turn" ..... He's taking down a slew of War4's cities........... Ming, "No problem, I'll have a smoke or two or three, hahahahhahahahhahahahhahahahaha"

oh he had a smoke alright....... it was a nuclear fire

rah · January 2, 2003, 10:14

And your troops hung around a bit to close and were smoked too.

War4ever · January 2, 2003, 14:35

well like i said, i think i lost more troops than anyone in the attack

but i did gain territory..and a quick surrender

it was a good chuckle for all....and Bird has never let me live it down....and usually guns for me when he plays.....haha

rah · January 12, 2003, 20:39

Due to the discussion in
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...threadid=73726

I propose that we include the unsinkable boad/plane as NOT allowed. If anyone want to defend the other side of this one, please feel free.

RAH

War4ever · January 12, 2003, 21:09

i second the vote rah

Ming · January 12, 2003, 21:18

I agree... that's a real old cheat, and I don't think anybody defended it's use in the past when it was first discovered.

Flatlander Fox · January 13, 2003, 01:31

Jeez, and that's how I've been winning all of our games.

If people need to be instructed on this, then they have issues.

But you never know I guess...

DrSpike · January 13, 2003, 05:25

A clear cheat.......however one you must be bound by honour on. Spartan says in the other thread he knows this cheat happened in his game......it must have been a long one cos this cheat is very hard to spot.

rah · January 13, 2003, 09:10

Quote:

Originally posted by Flatlander Fox
If people need to be instructed on this, then they have issues.

But you never know I guess...

Yes, it seems obvious, but I like getting it listed so there can be no doubt out it. I don't need people saying, "it wasn't specifically mentioned, so I though it was ok". Now granted everything isn't listed, but when anyone brings it up in these forums, I like to have it added.

Based on the intitial response, please add it to the list when you get a chance CW. Thanks.

Rich

ColdWizard · January 13, 2003, 11:49

done and done

rah · January 13, 2003, 12:48

That was quick,

Thanks, as always.

RAH

ColdWizard · January 13, 2003, 12:58

you're welcome, though if i'd gotten the two week vacation i'd wanted instead of the one week i was given, i'd have been a tad slower

/me grumbles about work, and the people that have been mucking around in his office and messing **** up

ColdWizard · January 13, 2003, 13:08

links updated to reflect SGs' Hut finder v1.3 and the current setting up ip games thread (seems like there's a new one every week

)

War4ever · January 13, 2003, 19:12

good its official now

rah · January 14, 2003, 09:55

I'm actually surprised that someone didn't defend it.

DrSpike · January 14, 2003, 10:06

Quote:

Originally posted by rah
I'm actually surprised that someone didn't defend it.

Yes me too. Thinking about it, is this much more dishonourable than black map clicking, or scouting using bugs, or many other gameplay elements that make no sense?

I think the trireme thing is a cheat, as I said, but then, I don't really like the other things I mentioned either. However, I do them because they are generally accepted as part of the game. Of course to a certain extent it doesn't really matter what is 'part of the game' as long as everyone agrees, which is why the RAH rules is useful. I'd ban it if you can, but it's hard to spot, like the other things that have become accepted over the years.

War4ever · January 14, 2003, 17:15

yes but in "our" group, we dont' need to look for it....thats the beauty of this group, there is no "i wont do it again i promise bs" that can be found in other playing circles

so what is agreed upon, is 100% trustworthy

makes the game more enjoyable that way....

rah · January 14, 2003, 18:15

Amen, if we have newbies in our group that we can't control, so be it. I can honestly say that I trust all the regulars 100%.