|
View Poll Results: Should this amendment be added to the constitution
|
|
Yes
|
|
19 |
50.00% |
No
|
|
18 |
47.37% |
Abstain
|
|
1 |
2.63% |
|
October 5, 2002, 00:00
|
#31
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: As cuddly as a cactus, as charming as an eel.
Posts: 8,196
|
I was saying it CAN be Official AND officially acted upon. One who challenges it MUST prove it is Invalid. I do not believe the court would rule in their favor as the two polls have diferent purposes. I am willing to defend it as such, and even the third poll which would be which city gets the palace or th FP. I don't see why you fear a POSSIBLE court case so much. Worst that could happen is the poll become invalid.
|
|
|
|
October 7, 2002, 10:00
|
#32
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: As cuddly as a cactus, as charming as an eel.
Posts: 8,196
|
Back on topic:
What is everyone's feelings on the MoE distributing funds for the SMC and City Planner to use as they see fit?
|
|
|
|
October 7, 2002, 10:31
|
#33
|
King
Local Time: 09:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AUERSTADT
Posts: 1,757
|
I think that the request made by Ministers must be supported by other members of the Government (including the Prez of course). However good is the judgment of somebody, there can be other priorities which have to be appraised by the governement as a whole.
__________________
Statistical anomaly.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
|
|
|
|
October 7, 2002, 20:06
|
#34
|
Emperor
Local Time: 04:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 8,807
|
This would have been somewhat o.k., but it fails to address 2 instances:
1) Rushing under Governments of either Despotism & Communism; which will affect City production, economic output and overall happyness.
2) Drafting of Conscripts, which will also do the same effects as above.
I think this admendment needs to also consider these.
E_T
__________________
Worship the Comic here!
Term IV Deputy Foreign Minister for Trade of Apolytonia, Term V CP & Term VI DM of Apolytonia, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI
Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game
|
|
|
|
October 7, 2002, 20:08
|
#35
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: of the Free World
Posts: 7,296
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by E_T
This would have been somewhat o.k., but it fails to address 2 instances:
1) Rushing under Governments of either Despotism & Communism; which will affect City production, economic output and overall happyness.
2) Drafting of Conscripts, which will also do the same effects as above.
I think this admendment needs to also consider these.
E_T
|
::chuckle::
I guess we're all so much still in the Civ/Civ2 mindset that we still seem to forget about pop rushing
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2002, 13:43
|
#36
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland Heights, MO
Posts: 6,188
|
Thinking of Drafting, I bet Dudha wishes that foreign nationals could be drafted.
__________________
1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
Templar Science Minister
AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now. :mad:
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2002, 13:49
|
#37
|
Emperor
Local Time: 02:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: As cuddly as a cactus, as charming as an eel.
Posts: 8,196
|
I was purposely leaving out Drafting and PopRushing.
Why?
This is a patchwork amendment. Only meant to cover the problem at hand until the Constitutional Convention gets their entirely new CoL together. We are not going to be in a Communism before that. This is to fix the problem at hand:
No one is in charge of the cash, and many people want to have their say in the spending of such. Someone must be responsible.
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2002, 17:10
|
#38
|
King
Local Time: 09:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AUERSTADT
Posts: 1,757
|
When all Ministers have said what they want to buy and how much it costs, and assuming that there is not enough cash available to do everything, priorities have to be established. Opinions can be different, even opposite ; the Gov. needs a smooth decision process to solve that problem. If necessary someone has to arbitrate between opposite views ; it could be a President responsibility.
__________________
Statistical anomaly.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
|
|
|
|
October 8, 2002, 20:36
|
#39
|
Prince
Local Time: 03:53
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Oak Ridge, El Niño, Apolyton
Posts: 423
|
I don't know, the more I think about it the more I like this ammendment, and not just because I'm the current MoE and possibly will be for the next term as well. I've learned over the past few weeks that, honestly, many demands are made upon Apolytonia's coffers, and it is vital that someone can look at it all, from a more unbiased p.o.v. I think up until now, when the City Planner or SMC or Foreign Ministry has spent cash on something, no one has really stopped and looked at how it effects things as a whole, or where the money could have been spent instead (if you know anything about economics, I'm referring to "oppurtunity cost")... in short, I think this ammendment will allow for a much better organization and distribution of funds than has heretofore existed. Like Unortho said, someone's gotta be responsible.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53.
|
|