Thread Tools
Old October 12, 2002, 20:03   #31
Samudragupt
Settler
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally posted by Ethelred

Its still Damascus. 6BC is nothing. Rome was founded centuries before that and its a youngster in comparison to Damascus or even Athens. You gotta work on your math.
Ethelred : thanks for suggesting math work to me . After putting in requisite amount of work it turns out I did make an error , not only in the case of Damascus but also Benaras . Damascus is, as you said , 3rd millineum BC but Benaras too is 6th millineum BC. So I guess status quo remains as far as the previous post was concerned. Now after further net research it seems that there is a very tough fight between Damascus and Banaras (and I cant decide one way or the other) but certainly not between Banaras and Athens (or Rome) which is a virtual knockout in Banaras' favour.

PS : If I were you I wouldnt work on my Math but certainly on my attitude .
__________________
"Benaras is older than history, older than tradition, even older than legend and looks twice as old as all of them put together" - Mark Twain
Your face, your ass; whats the difference - Da'Duke
Samudragupt is offline  
Old October 12, 2002, 21:25   #32
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally posted by Samudragupt
PS : If I were you I wouldnt work on my Math but certainly on my attitude .
Bleep off. Is that enough attitude for you? If not I am sure I can manage more but I could get banned that way.

Benares or Varanasi as far as I can tell is frequently claimed to be the oldest or one of the oldest cities continually inhabited either in the world or in India but I can't find a thing to back the claim. Its mentioned on a bunch of sites that Buddha was there in 500BC but that isn't far enough back to qualify. I haven't found a thing to support a date of 6000BC. Not even 2000 BC for that matter.

Can you supply a link that has some actual dates? Preferably with some evidence unlike all the tourist sites I keep finding that don't even give a general idea of the city's actual age. I don't care what city is the oldest except for I like to know everything I can. Which city it is doesn't matter to me. Everything I can find so far still points to Damascus for Oldest Continually Inhabited city. Lots of cities make the claim but Damascus seems to have evidence to support a claim of at least 5000 years of continual habitation.

There a LOT cities making claims:

Knya, Turkey
http://www.khgm.gov.tr/isd.htm
Konya, one of the Turkey’s oldest (6800 B.C.) continuously inhabited city was known as Iconium in Roman times.

Even Athens is into this hyperbole as if it needed more recognition.

http://www.travelling.gr/helloathens/Capital.html
The oldest inhabited city in the world, the cradle of democracy and Western civiliza-tion as we know it today, was begun as a small fortified village built on top of the Acropolis rock as far back as 3.000 years B.C.

Here is one in Bulgaria making claims of being the oldest. No evidence just claims.

http://www.plovdiv.org/history.html

Kendros, Eumolpia, Philippopolis, Pulpudeva, Thrimonzium, Pulden, Populdin, Ploudin, Filibe -- those were the ancient names of Plovdiv throughout its 6000 to 8000 years of existence. The name Plovdiv first appeared in 15 century documents and has remained till today.

The 6000 year claim seems a tad more likely. That puts it at the start of the Bronze Age in the Balkans and surely bronze wasn't usually being made in villages.

From what I can see just about any city that has no idea of when it was founded is making exagerated claims of age.
Ethelred is offline  
Old October 12, 2002, 23:01   #33
ThaddeusAlexander
Prince
 
ThaddeusAlexander's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (Canada's TRUE capitol :))
Posts: 309
Wow Ethelred, I don't think there was a single remark in the above post that i disagree with.

One small point (not big)

Quote:
Everything I can find so far still points to Damascus for Oldest Continually Inhabited city. Lots of cities make the claim but Damascus seems to have evidence to support a claim of at least 5000 years of continual habitation.
One of my texts published the start of 2002 reaffirms Damascus as having the longest continually inhabited run of 5400 years. I checked some older texts and two from 2001 state 5400 as well, one from 2001 states 4900 and others pre-and-up-to 2000 state anywhere from 4500 to 5000.

Which makes sense to me because through my last years in school and work in Europe there was much talk about Damascus and an archeologist by the name of (if i remember correctly) Jacob Defrance (Difance or something like that) was tracing historical records to narrow down the date. And yes, if it makes you feel better, I'm sure he did some C14 testing on specifics too . I think his work is proving Damascus to have a longer than previously thought inhabited state.

I think he was looking back to the founding of the city ... after all, Damascus didn't pop up over night Again you need to set a firm borden on when it started as a "city" which in itself is a crude term now. Regardless, I'll check back up on that... but there were no credits in the text.

Cheers
~Thadalex

PS I'll try to find the archeologist's name and see if his work is published anywhere reputable on the net, or if anything is published elsewhere.
__________________
"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion"
-Democritus of Abdera
ThaddeusAlexander is offline  
Old October 12, 2002, 23:14   #34
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
You are all extremely wrong.

The oldest cities in the world weren't cities initially, they were towns.

And most of them were founded in 4000BC, with a few shortly later in 3950BC.

C14 testing has confirmed it, with no possibility of error.

__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old October 12, 2002, 23:26   #35
ThaddeusAlexander
Prince
 
ThaddeusAlexander's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (Canada's TRUE capitol :))
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally posted by Theseus
You are all extremely wrong.

The oldest cities in the world weren't cities initially, they were towns.

And most of them were founded in 4000BC, with a few shortly later in 3950BC.

C14 testing has confirmed it, with no possibility of error.

Oh god, not again...

~Thadalex
__________________
"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion"
-Democritus of Abdera
ThaddeusAlexander is offline  
Old October 12, 2002, 23:56   #36
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
Forgot about the Game we are supposed to be discussing Thatdeus? The cities in Civ III are founded in 4000 BC.

Unfortunatly there is no silicon equivalent of C14 so I couldn't make a good joke about that to counterpoint his. All the naturally occuring istotopes of silicon are stable and all the radioactive isotopes are fairly to very short lived. Longest is silicon 32 at 160 years. The rest are hours or less.
Ethelred is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 02:29   #37
Theseus
PtWDG Gathering StormApolyton UniversityApolytoners Hall of FameBtS Tri-LeagueC4DG Gathering StormApolyCon 06 Participants
Emperor
 
Theseus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 05:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm!
Posts: 8,907
Thanks, Ethelred.

Although the tennis match has been interesting thus far, I think you guys should relax. As well as I understand dating, quantum brouhaha is going to seriously screw up exactitude in any form of element approach... thus leaving a combo of dating methodologies as good as we can get, and, in the absence of sediment layers, a great deal of uncertainty.

More interesting, I think, and certainly more OT: what defines the beginning of a civilization? In a pretty funny way, you have both referenced the same 'event' as the entree point... the first city (i.e., my Settler built a town!!).

I'm not as into this subject as you guys, but I'm fairly well read... in post-school reading, "Guns, Germs, and Steel" has been my favorite.

4000BC... I'm sticking to it.
__________________
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.

Duas uncias in puncta mortalis est.
Theseus is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 04:04   #38
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally posted by Theseus
As well as I understand dating, quantum brouhaha is going to seriously screw up exactitude in any form of element approach... thus leaving a combo of dating methodologies as good as we can get, and, in the absence of sediment layers, a great deal of uncertainty.
Its not quantum effects that are the problem with C14. Its the quality of the sample and the lab and the choice of the sample. A bone could be from someone that ate a lot of seafood which often has a lot of old carbon in it or a piece of burnt wood might have come from a tree that died a long time before it was put in the fire pit. The sample can be contaminated with old carbon from ancient sources or from newer carbon as well.

C14 is produced in the upper atmosphere by cosmic ray bombardment and the production of it varies from day to day and more to the point year to year. Tree ring dating has been used to calibrate it but the living trees don't go back as far as the habitations we have been discussing. The oldest tree in the world isn't as old as Damascus may be so the calibration gets a bit hazier back that far although it has been done with long dead trees from the same forest. The catch with the dead trees and even the live ones is they grow very slow so counting the rings is subject to error and cross dating the dead ones with live ones and with each other adds in more room for error.

Nice page on the Bristlecone Pines
http://www.sonic.net/bristlecone/home.html

Page specific to dendrochronolgy. He seems more certains about the results than others are.
http://www.sonic.net/bristlecone/dendro.html

A nicer site at least it looks better

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/methuselah/

Quote:
More interesting, I think, and certainly more OT: what defines the beginning of a civilization? In a pretty funny way, you have both referenced the same 'event' as the entree point... the first city (i.e., my Settler built a town!!).
Depends on what you are calling civilization. While it literly means citification what a city is is the question. Towns are cities. Just small ones but does a village qualify and what differentiates a large village from a small town. Well at one time a wall certainly would do that but its not the only criterion available.

Personally I don't see a jumble of houses as a city. To me a city has reached the point where the city is more than a collection of families or kin groups where everyone lives pretty much the same except maybe a shaman or three. Specialization by people to have different ways of making a living is a big change from everyone being farmers and hunters even when they are community leaders.

Quote:
I'm not as into this subject as you guys, but I'm fairly well read... in post-school reading, "Guns, Germs, and Steel" has been my favorite.

4000BC... I'm sticking to it.
I need to get around to reading that but I read a lot Jared Diamond's articles in magazines and I had allready seen much of his thinking on this from them.
Ethelred is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 08:32   #39
Demerzel
Warlord
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
IIRC someone who ate a lot of fish in their life will indeed have a C14 "date" that is older than truly accurate, however they will also have an elevated nitrogen count which can be used to recalibrate the data.

Saw that on a documentary on the Discovery channel, where the lab initally went for it being a 12th century bone from a priest but then revised it to 13th century due to the priest being a bit of a fish fanatic.
Demerzel is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 08:45   #40
ChrisiusMaximus
Civilization III PBEMApolyton Storywriters' GuildCivilization III Democracy GameC3CDG Blood Oath HordeC4DG The HordeC4BtSDG Rabbits of CaerbannogCiv4 SP Democracy GameCivilization IV PBEMC4WDG éirich tuireann
Emperor
 
ChrisiusMaximus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Staffordshire England
Posts: 8,321
So there is something fishy about this C14 testing after all.
__________________
A proud member of the "Apolyton Story Writers Guild".There are many great stories at the Civ 3 stories forum, do yourself a favour and visit the forum. Lose yourself in one of many epic tales and be inspired to write yourself, as I was.
ChrisiusMaximus is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 10:17   #41
Demerzel
Warlord
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
oh dear

if you keep up with that I'll have a bone to pick with you
Demerzel is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 12:31   #42
ChrisiusMaximus
Civilization III PBEMApolyton Storywriters' GuildCivilization III Democracy GameC3CDG Blood Oath HordeC4DG The HordeC4BtSDG Rabbits of CaerbannogCiv4 SP Democracy GameCivilization IV PBEMC4WDG éirich tuireann
Emperor
 
ChrisiusMaximus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Staffordshire England
Posts: 8,321
Yes yes okay I apologise but do you know how old the bone is,
__________________
A proud member of the "Apolyton Story Writers Guild".There are many great stories at the Civ 3 stories forum, do yourself a favour and visit the forum. Lose yourself in one of many epic tales and be inspired to write yourself, as I was.
ChrisiusMaximus is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 12:52   #43
ThaddeusAlexander
Prince
 
ThaddeusAlexander's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (Canada's TRUE capitol :))
Posts: 309
Its all coming together now ...

I apologize for being away from the discussion but tomorrow is thanksgiving after all and there's lots to be done!

Cheers!
~Thadalex
__________________
"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion"
-Democritus of Abdera
ThaddeusAlexander is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 13:13   #44
Demerzel
Warlord
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
thanksgiving, whats that then?
Demerzel is offline  
Old October 13, 2002, 13:34   #45
ThaddeusAlexander
Prince
 
ThaddeusAlexander's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (Canada's TRUE capitol :))
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally posted by Demerzel
thanksgiving, whats that then?
You don't know what thanksgiving is?

~Thadalex
__________________
"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion"
-Democritus of Abdera
ThaddeusAlexander is offline  
Old October 14, 2002, 05:11   #46
gsmoove23
Warlord
 
gsmoove23's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189
Anyone for Catalhoyuk in Turkey? Dated to the 8th millenium BC, no stone wall but lots and lots of houses clumped together. Doesn't seem to get as much press as Jericho for some reason. But neither of these are cities, nor are they on the massive scale of this 'lost' city in India. Catalhoyuk has been described as an overgrown town and the problem with Jericho is its a wall around a mud layer so the actual nature of the settlement is difficult to discern. The wall is impressive and obviously took organization to put together, but organization does not necessarily make a city. Chieftain gathers people from the surrounding countryside and voila.
gsmoove23 is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 10:33   #47
gsmoove23
Warlord
 
gsmoove23's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189
Anyway, some people also call Catalhoyuk the oldest city, whether it deserves the claim or not.
gsmoove23 is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 11:20   #48
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
Perhaps if you had posted a link you would have gotten more of a response.
Ethelred is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 11:34   #49
gsmoove23
Warlord
 
gsmoove23's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189
Sorry, I got my info the old fashioned way, learned it in school. But I spelled it right if you want to look it up.
gsmoove23 is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 12:03   #50
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
No I don't want to look it up. I looked up other cities and the BS index was exceedingly high. Now if you want to support what you said you are very wellcome to do the search (and find out how its spelled on the net) and post a link to something other than a BS tourist site I would like to look at it. Today I don't have the time to hunt through the BS.
Ethelred is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 12:49   #51
gsmoove23
Warlord
 
gsmoove23's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189
Oh for crying out loud, you should know the name if you've ever picked up a history of civilization book written after 1960, but you're right and please forgive me. Here are 3 sites I've found in 2 minutes of looking.

http://www.telesterion.com/catal1.htm

http://www.focusmm.com/civcty/cathyk00.htm

http://www.mfa.gov.tr/grupc/ca/caa/u...dolu/hoyuk.htm

They all seem to differ on the date of establishment but they all claim it to be the oldest city. I didn't bring it up because I wanted to challenge Jericho's claim, Just to show another example of a settlement widely claimed to be the oldest city since the 1950s and 60s with a little evidence to back it up.
gsmoove23 is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 13:39   #52
Demerzel
Warlord
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally posted by ThaddeusAlexander


You don't know what thanksgiving is?

~Thadalex
heh 'course I know what thanksgiving is, it's when we give thanks for having the Americans 3000 miles away isn't it?

You might want to calm down Ethelred, you seem to be giving a tad bit stressed over a simple discussion.
Demerzel is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 13:51   #53
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally posted by gsmoove23
Oh for crying out loud, you should know the name if you've ever picked up a history of civilization book written after 1960, but you're right and please forgive me. Here are 3 sites I've found in 2 minutes of looking.
I have done that and I hadn't heard of the city. I admit I don't get every issue of Archeology.


http://www.telesterion.com/catal1.htm
Quote:
The oldest layer of Catal Huyuk yet excavated (virgin soil has not been reached) is reliably carbon dated to 6,500 B.C,, and reveals a thriving, completely developed and planned, city.
Nice but not quite as old as Jericho or that new Indian site. Might be a bit of hyperbole however since the page also says that only one acre has been excavated. Not much excavation for claiming it was planned. It might however be enough to establish that is wasn't just a jumble.


http://www.focusmm.com/civcty/cathyk00.htm

That site is better. I think the distinction between it and Jericho is the walls though this city looks larger. However the claim on the previous that it was a planned city seems a tad exessive based on the images on this page.

http://www.focusmm.com/civcty/cathyk04.htm


http://www.mfa.gov.tr/grupc/ca/caa/u...dolu/hoyuk.htm

Not as usefull as the second link. Don't see anything to comment on there.

Quote:
They all seem to differ on the date of establishment but they all claim it to be the oldest city.
Its a fairly small range in comparison to some of the cities claimed as oldest. 8000 to 9000 years. That puts it in about the same range as Jericho and the underwater Indian site. Give or take a thousand which seems to be range of error. 500 hundred years either way of the middle.

Quote:
I didn't bring it up because I wanted to challenge Jericho's claim, Just to show another example of a settlement widely claimed to be the oldest city since the 1950s and 60s with a little evidence to back it up.
Thank you. Looks like a lot more than village. Too many people to call it just a village. More like a town which is what can be expected for early cities. I can't yet see signs of a merchant class which I consider the most important aspect of a city, the tools could be from specialist or maybe just the best at it amongst farmers. I don't know if Jericho had signs of a merchant class either till the higher levels.

To me the key item of civilization is the emergence of specialized ways of making a living. Merchants, skilled craftsment and the like. A religious class probably arose before even the earliest city maybe even without villages so I don't consider that an attribute only of cities. A rulling class might have arose around the same time as larger villages. Hard to tell since even when cities and trade are firmly established some rulers still apear to have been farming on occasion.
Ethelred is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 13:59   #54
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally posted by Demerzel


You might want to calm down Ethelred, you seem to be giving a tad bit stressed over a simple discussion.
Just argueing. I like to argue.
Ethelred is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 15:10   #55
gsmoove23
Warlord
 
gsmoove23's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189
The maddening thing about archaeology is that the only thing anybody ever is able to say for sure is they don't know for sure. This goes for defining a city as well, I've seen many differing definitions. I prefer that famous quote from some conservative American statesman that I've forgotten the name of, when asked to define pornography "I'll know it when I see it".

Well Ethelred, you critiqued my references and one like turn deserves another I checked out yours(if you think I'm being combatative please realize that I also like to argue and you're right, I am combatative)

-Neolithic Tower

Discovered and excavated by Kathleen Kenyon in her Trench I, the Neolithic tower was built and destroyed in Pre-Pottery Neolithic A, which Kenyon dated to 8000-7000 B.C. The 8m diameter tower stands 8m tall and was connected on the inside of a 4m thick wall.

On the basis of this discovery, archaeologists have claimed that Jericho is the "oldest city in the world." Clearly such monumental construction reflects social organization and central authority, but there are good reasons to question both its dating to the 8th millennium B.C. and its function as a defensive fortification.

-from http://www.bibleplaces.com/jericho.htm

I haven't been able to find reasons for the questioning of the date but I did find these sites which elaborates on the finds at the site.

http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/07.html

http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/Je...ll_Sultan.html

The dating seems to be earlier but its status I think is questionable. There doesn't seem to be much evidence of a large population and the existence of large walls isn't a reason to automatically assume a large population.

Catalhoyuk seems to lack much in the way of higher organization unless u consider the organization involved in simply sustaining such a large pop evident by the amount of dwellings found.
gsmoove23 is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 15:17   #56
ThaddeusAlexander
Prince
 
ThaddeusAlexander's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (Canada's TRUE capitol :))
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally posted by Demerzel
heh 'course I know what thanksgiving is, it's when we give thanks for having the Americans 3000 miles away isn't it?
See since I'm in Canada that doesn't really apply to me...

Cheers
~Thadalex
__________________
"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion"
-Democritus of Abdera
ThaddeusAlexander is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 15:22   #57
ThaddeusAlexander
Prince
 
ThaddeusAlexander's Avatar
 
Local Time: 04:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (Canada's TRUE capitol :))
Posts: 309
Has anyone else noticed how Ethelred likes the word "Hyperbole" and the "Walls" of jericho a lot?

Maybe hyperbole was one of the few "toilet paper word of the day" words that stuck

Cheers
~Thadalex
__________________
"Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion"
-Democritus of Abdera
ThaddeusAlexander is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 15:49   #58
Demerzel
Warlord
 
Local Time: 09:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally posted by ThaddeusAlexander


See since I'm in Canada that doesn't really apply to me...

Cheers
~Thadalex
Unlucky. Maybe in the future you'll have enough money to move somewhere further from the American menace?
Demerzel is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 16:48   #59
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally posted by gsmoove23
On the basis of this discovery, archaeologists have claimed that Jericho is the "oldest city in the world." Clearly such monumental construction reflects social organization and central authority, but there are good reasons to question both its dating to the 8th millennium B.C. and its function as a defensive fortification.

-from http://www.bibleplaces.com/jericho.htm


I haven't been able to find reasons for the questioning of the date but I did find these sites which elaborates on the finds at the site.
Well the tower is in the second level at Jericho. This earliest wall is older from I have read before. The thing about dating with Jericho is that the Fundamentalists don't want ANYTHING older than they think the Bible allows. Since Jericho is in the Bible its treated from a religious point of view far more often than from a more academic archeologist viewpoint.

http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/07.html

http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/Je...ll_Sultan.html

Those sites are both using the same source. Anyway the source is basicly saying the C14 dating has a bigger range of error then he would like. To me the dating seems OK but not perfect, close to being within the range of error. The British Museum and the Philidelphia lab have a fairly small gap between them when you take the error range into account.

That Turkish site didn't give the error range. So we can't judge it accuracy againt the Jericho tests. Especially since the dating may have been done longer ago than the Jericho dating. In other words with older equipment.

Quote:
The dating seems to be earlier but its status I think is questionable. There doesn't seem to be much evidence of a large population and the existence of large walls isn't a reason to automatically assume a large population.
I don't think Jericho had a large population at least early on. The only thing the walls do is show a higher level of orginizational sophistication than many unwalled cities do.

Quote:
Catalhoyuk seems to lack much in the way of higher organization unless u consider the organization involved in simply sustaining such a large pop evident by the amount of dwellings found.
Its likely most of the organization was in the fields. Who worked what land and such. Without signs of irrigation there isn't a lot of high level long term organization needed. Many of the early civilizations were built around irrigation which forced them to develop a beuracracy of some kind.
Ethelred is offline  
Old October 15, 2002, 16:51   #60
Ethelred
King
 
Ethelred's Avatar
 
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Anaheim, California
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally posted by ThaddeusAlexander
Has anyone else noticed how Ethelred likes the word "Hyperbole" and the "Walls" of jericho a lot?
Hyperbole and claims of which city is the oldest go together quite often.

Quote:
Maybe hyperbole was one of the few "toilet paper word of the day" words that stuck

Cheers
~Thadalex
You need that toilet paper. Get it now.
Ethelred is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team