|
View Poll Results: Do you agree with playing with 12 Civs?
|
|
Yes
|
|
14 |
87.50% |
No
|
|
1 |
6.25% |
Abstain
|
|
1 |
6.25% |
|
November 8, 2002, 10:12
|
#1
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: De Hel van Enschede
Posts: 11,702
|
Map Setting Finalization: Number of Civs
Time to decide on the map settings. See this thread for more introduction crap
See the Civs poll, distribution of votes:
7: 1
8: 2
9: 1
10: 3
11: 2
12: 5
13: 0
14: 3
15: 3
16: 1
20: 2
20+: 2
Keep in mind we'll almost certainly be playing a Gigantic map. 12 got the most votes, 11 the most votes including neighbouring votes (12 and 15 are shared second). Median is 12. 40% voted for 10-12, 28% for 14-16. Based on this all, 11 or 12 seems to make the most sense. If 12 is rejected in this poll, we would have to hold a poll with only 11 and 15 as options.
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 11:53
|
#2
|
King
Local Time: 07:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: of Natal, Brazil
Posts: 2,555
|
I have a doubt! Can someone explain if it is 12 civs (human + Brab + 10 AI) or some other distribution?
__________________
"Kill a man and you are a murder.
Kill thousands and you are a conquer.
Kill all and you are a God!"
-Jean Rostand
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 12:31
|
#3
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: De Hel van Enschede
Posts: 11,702
|
12 = 1 human + 11 AIs. It doesn't include the Barbarians (as I explained in the original thread). It's the userprofile.txt value, if that helps...
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 14:57
|
#4
|
Super Moderator
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 6,206
|
I originally voted for 10 civs but as I already stated a slighly higher number is also ok, therefore my vote is Yes.
-Martin
__________________
Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 21:57
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 07:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: of Natal, Brazil
Posts: 2,555
|
10 would be perfect but i am afraid we can have a 15 with a run-off poll therefore i will save my vote for later.
__________________
"Kill a man and you are a murder.
Kill thousands and you are a conquer.
Kill all and you are a God!"
-Jean Rostand
|
|
|
|
November 9, 2002, 02:27
|
#6
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 10:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Felton, Delaware
Posts: 32
|
I missed voting in this poll, but suppose it would have been irrelevant as I would prefer as many civs as possible anyway, and for two reasons 1st). obviously being the challenge, and 2nd). our modern world has some 140 or more sovereign nations now, and that leaves room for a lot of difference in opinion.
But! I suppose 15 would work.
__________________
Where there's a whip, there's a way.; Tolkien "the Hobbit"
|
|
|
|
November 9, 2002, 03:02
|
#7
|
Emperor
Local Time: 22:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mad.
Posts: 4,142
|
Isn't it 200+ Nations? At least according to the latest FIFA Soccer Rankings
|
|
|
|
November 9, 2002, 10:07
|
#8
|
Super Moderator
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 6,206
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by redbull
Isn't it 200+ Nations? At least according to the latest FIFA Soccer Rankings
|
Yes there are nations like Scottland, Wales or England. If I remember correctly there are something like 180 - 190 countries on the wolrd, today. So nations != countries.
-Martin
__________________
Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"
|
|
|
|
November 9, 2002, 10:46
|
#9
|
Deity
Local Time: 12:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: De Hel van Enschede
Posts: 11,702
|
What Martin said. Add to that things like the Dutch Antilles and the US Virgin Islands and you can easily get 200+ 'nations'. The UN currently has 191 members though (Switzerland being the youngest member). The 140 number would have been roughly accurate 25-30 years ago, but times are achanging...
|
|
|
|
November 9, 2002, 13:38
|
#10
|
Prince
Local Time: 03:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 916
|
I agree, let's get the ball rolling...
|
|
|
|
November 12, 2002, 10:49
|
#11
|
King
Local Time: 11:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: France
Posts: 1,986
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40.
|
|