 |
View Poll Results: Should any unit have lethal bombardment? (Unofficial, 6 days)
|
|
|
Yes
|
   
|
5 |
33.33% |
|
No
|
  
|
10 |
66.67% |
|
November 8, 2002, 16:00
|
#1
|
|
Firaxis Games Programmer/Designer
Local Time: 06:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 9,567
|
Mod Issue: Bombardment
Okay, people don't seem to like mods, but those who've spoken out on lethal bombardment like the idea. Okay, should we have lethal bombardment for any units then? (unofficial)
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 16:10
|
#2
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 05:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 682
|
Let’s play vanilla Civ, a game we all know, not somebody’s rule mod that they’ve learned how to exploit (or is best for someone’s particular way of playing). I’m all about moding, but I really don’t think that this is the place. Lethal bombardment is a SERIOUS rule change and will require further balancing (e.g. Korean UU already has LB, so we’re de-valuing this unit, same with cruse missiles, de-valuing defensive units and UUs, and creating a comparative advantage for fast units and UUs just to name a few). Let’s not open Pandora’s box.
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 16:16
|
#3
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 05:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 733
|
As I have said before, lets keep the game unmodded
I definately dont want lethal bombarded for air/sea artillery/radar artillery because It would allow the opportunity for someone to attack from sea/their own territory and kill all the units in a city before any kind of land unit battle
__________________
Citizen of the Apolyton team in the ISDG
Currently known as Senor Rubris in the PTW DG team
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 16:22
|
#4
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 10:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
Posts: 4,223
|
I agree with Randolph on this one.
This isn't the time to experiment with mods.
__________________
If I'm posting here then Counterglow must be down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 17:23
|
#5
|
|
King
Local Time: 06:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Waterloo, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,500
|
Agreed. No mods.
__________________
"I used to be a Scotialist, and spent a brief period as a Royalist, but now I'm PC"
-me, discussing my banking history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 18:13
|
#6
|
|
King
Local Time: 04:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Peace is my profession... no, really!
Posts: 1,162
|
I just got a good look at your signature, punkbass, and I think its factually incorrect. I don't know if we are pillaging and plundering the entire world. We certainly haven't done so to Canada; for some reason, you all won't let us 
__________________
"The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country." -- Abraham Lincoln
"Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever, in flesh and blood, walked upon this earth." -- Albert Einstein, in regards to Mohandis Gandhi
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2002, 18:27
|
#7
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:41
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: listening too long to one song
Posts: 7,395
|
no mods 
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41.
|
|
