Confirmation of panag as VP - Page 4

Shiber · December 20, 2002, 12:27

Anybody wants to change his mind?

UnOrthOdOx · December 20, 2002, 12:39

Aparantly MrWIA was not impressed with the bribe..er I mean gifts panag was handing out?

Shiber · December 20, 2002, 12:47

You can't leech images off angelfire.

UnOrthOdOx · December 20, 2002, 12:54

?

Shows up for me, site said could take them...

GhengisFarb™ · December 20, 2002, 13:30

Quote:

Originally posted by Shiber
You can't leech images off angelfire.

Shiber · December 20, 2002, 14:06

He put an img tag leading to an image stored on angelfire.com in his post. However, Angelfire does not allow leeching of images so the post displayed a warning message instead of the original image.
Afterwards UnOrthO removed the image tag, which was a smart move.

Panag · December 20, 2002, 15:19

hi ,

thanks guys for the vote

have a nice day & happy X-mas

OPD · December 20, 2002, 18:10

more maddness here.

*OPD removes Panag from ignore list

I guess its well done then panag but be sure to acknowledge what has been said here for people will be watching that you do your job.
However you should also note that, much greater is he who succeds despite negative opinions. Your term will be one of much focus and should you make it a success then you will be remembered as a respectable man for much longer than other VP's.

Shiber · December 21, 2002, 11:21

The chat is starting and Panag is not here.
I would have expected a responsible person to come to at least one turnchat (or at least provide an excuse for why he can't come) before he may be called into duty so that he'd at least know what would be expected of him. But then again, Panag is not responsible nor dependable.

Of course I'd take all this back if Panag would just show up or at least give an excuse why he can't, but I doubt that this would happen.

GhengisFarb™ · December 21, 2002, 11:43

Quote:

Originally posted by Shiber
The chat is starting and Panag is not here.
I would have expected a responsible person to come to at least one turnchat (or at least provide an excuse for why he can't come) before he may be called into duty so that he'd at least know what would be expected of him. But then again, Panag is not responsible nor dependable.

Of course I'd take all this back if Panag would just show up or at least give an excuse why he can't, but I doubt that this would happen.

The Battling Iraelis!

Shiber · December 21, 2002, 12:18

Hey, let's call in Meshelic and perhaps Sirotnikov too so that we can have an all-Israelis war!!

Panag · December 21, 2002, 12:46

Quote:

Originally posted by Shiber
The chat is starting and Panag is not here.
I would have expected a responsible person to come to at least one turnchat (or at least provide an excuse for why he can't come) before he may be called into duty so that he'd at least know what would be expected of him. But then again, Panag is not responsible nor dependable.

Of course I'd take all this back if Panag would just show up or at least give an excuse why he can't, but I doubt that this would happen.

hey ,

shiber you are so full of crap , ......

with your lies and your crap , .....man , you fall low , ...

have a nice day

E_T · December 21, 2002, 13:03

Panag did attend the Chat, but he kept on being pestered by Shiber. Panag finally left because of it. Shiber was being very childish.

E_T

Shiber · December 21, 2002, 13:09

I was NOT pestering Panag, regardless of what he said!!
I did however suggest that Panag takes charge during turn 1 in order for him to gain some practice, which is very important in case that he'll have to run a turnchat this term, and he responded to my offer with VERY foul language.
Panag, I know I can't tell you what to say but I do ask you not to utter such obscene expressions as you have again, in the public channel or via private messages. Ever.

Panag · December 21, 2002, 13:18

Quote:

Originally posted by Shiber
I was NOT pestering Panag, regardless of what he said!!
I did however suggest that Panag takes charge during turn 1 in order for him to gain some practice, which is very important in case that he'll have to run a turnchat this term, and he responded to my offer with VERY foul language.
Panag, I know I can't tell you what to say but I do ask you not to utter such obscene expressions as you have again, in the public channel or via private messages. Ever.

hi ,

yes you are acting like a little child , and by the way , no matter what knick , you kept on bashing , ......

that aint good

if you dont want "obscene" language , then dont start to sent it and other crap ,

now drop it and stop it , ......

and this is really the last time , patience is running out

have a nice day

E_T · December 21, 2002, 13:19

That is something that you need to take up with the president, NOT the VP! He can ask the VP if he want to do a turn or not, but he should be the one to ask.

E_T

Shiber · December 21, 2002, 13:22

Welcome back to my ignore list Panag.
This may be a crude solution but at least it will stop me from being tempted to answer back.

Shiber · December 21, 2002, 13:28

Quote:

Originally posted by E_T
That is something that you need to take up with the president, NOT the VP! He can ask the VP if he want to do a turn or not, but he should be the one to ask.

E_T

I first suggested it on the public channel. It was addressed to anyone present and noone in specific.
I'm sorry however if my wording was unclear to you, and I apologize for repeating this suggestion several times in the chatroom.

Panag · December 21, 2002, 13:35

Quote:

Originally posted by Shiber

I first suggested it on the public channel. It was addressed to anyone present and noone in specific.
I'm sorry however if my wording was unclear to you, and I apologize for repeating this suggestion several times in the chatroom.

hey , why dont you say here all the crap you send in little pop up private windows , .......

Meshelic · December 21, 2002, 18:11

I've been watching this and am not pleased. Obviously there is dissent in certain executive and certain Senatorial branches against each other.

American's are used to this sort of politiking though.

But they're Israelis, and this could get ugly....

E_T · December 21, 2002, 19:32

It was in the chat and hopefully be addressed by the next chat

E_T

Panag · December 22, 2002, 10:19

Quote:

Originally posted by Meshelic
I've been watching this and am not pleased. Obviously there is dissent in certain executive and certain Senatorial branches against each other.

American's are used to this sort of politiking though.

But they're Israelis, and this could get ugly....

hi ,

some words are backed with weapons of WMD and others not , .........

as for this side ; ones again our weapons are in the storage room , an extra layer of concrete is added to protect the VP's house , .........

have a nice day

MrWhereItsAt · December 22, 2002, 19:54

We have never had such a strong swell of feeling against an Exec before. Surely if there's enough public dissatifaction that in itself is grounds for impeachment?

Nolan · December 22, 2002, 19:57

Indeed there should at least be an effort made by the court to try to find the root of the problems that have arisen since the election

Spiffor · December 22, 2002, 20:44

I may have missed something but : except the fact that some people dislike Panag, what are the problems you're referring to, Nolan ?

Nolan · December 22, 2002, 20:48

I'm not to worried, it was the concern of the person above me, I just think if there are people who think there are problems with the bickering in the senate, they should refer it to the court to be looked at instead of just saying how serious it is

Regards

Aro · December 22, 2002, 20:53

Quote:

From the New CoL

...
3 Impeachable offenses
(a) An official may be impeached only if he or she has violated the Constitution or a law that was in place prior to the alleged violation.
(b) The Constitution may not be amended, nor a law be passed that makes an action retroactively illegal.
...

There's no reason for impeachment. No offenses, no violations... Some people here dislikes panag (not me), so what?
IMO, panag can surprises everybody...

Nolan · December 22, 2002, 20:56

Yes but if there are people that have a problem, that problem should be discussed, at not brewed up, keeping it silent and taking sides will only cause more trouble in the long run

Regards

DAVOUT · December 22, 2002, 20:58

Quote:

Originally posted by Aro

There's no reason for impeachment. No offenses, no violations... Some people here dislikes panag (not me), so what?
IMO, panag can surprises everybody...

A new concept perhaps : the preemptive impeachment

Aro · December 22, 2002, 21:05