 |
View Poll Results: Do we want Wiseass to be the Minister of Domestic Affairs?
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 02:18
|
#1
|
Local Time: 08:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,135
|
ELECTION: Minister of Domestic Affairs
This poll will be open for 5 days, until 12:19am GMT-6 on December 26th.
We have one candidate, Wiseass
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 02:39
|
#2
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:02
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mad.
Posts: 4,142
|
I believe that it should be edited into the constitution that if there is only one candidate, he automatically makes it.
If no one else wishes to run, then whats the point in asking people if they'll have him in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 03:05
|
#3
|
Local Time: 08:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,135
|
the constitution does have a provision for only one person running, and it still calls for an election
Article V. 1g
|
Quote:
|
|
If only one candidate is available for an office, a Yes/No poll shall be held to decide if this person may serve in this office. This poll shall expire in five days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 04:33
|
#4
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:02
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mad.
Posts: 4,142
|
Yes, I fully accept that, but, my point is, what is the need? I mean, unless the person has a terrible track record, no one is going to vote against him unless they are at eachothers guts, or they are an unknown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 05:09
|
#5
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Your Mom's House... Why?
Posts: 481
|
heh I voted yes 
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 10:47
|
#6
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 3,826
|
The point is that they might indeed have a terrible track record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 11:49
|
#7
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 14:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 848
|
I might not agree, that someone is elected into office but don't have the time or the possibility (judges and other ministers) to be a candidate. That's why there has to be a poll, definately!
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 12:22
|
#8
|
Local Time: 08:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,135
|
in the "other" DG I've been playing in, we have rejected single candidates before
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 21, 2002, 14:35
|
#9
|
|
Super Moderator
Local Time: 15:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 6,206
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Wise Ass
heh I voted yes
|
And what is the problem with voting for oneself?
By the way Wise Ass have you already voted for CTP1/2 in the Top: Game top list thread. If not you should do it and of course anyone else who haven't voted, yet, should do it, too. You can't say something like this too often.
-Martin
__________________
Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2002, 18:57
|
#10
|
Local Time: 08:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,135
|
congratulations would normally be in order wiseass since you won, however this entire election may soon be declared unconstitutional. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 26, 2002, 22:24
|
#11
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:02
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Your Mom's House... Why?
Posts: 481
|
bah NEVER!
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02.
|
|
