Thread Tools
Old January 3, 2003, 16:36   #1
chequita guevara
ACDG The Human HiveDiplomacyApolytoners Hall of Fame
Emperor
 
chequita guevara's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Fort LOLderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Posts: 9,091
Bush's Approval Rating Slipping
Time magazine loves **** Cheney. Americans aren't so sure
The newsweekly gushes over the V.P. and the Bush administration in its year-end issue -- ignoring its own poll showing a major erosion in public support for the White House.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Eric Boehlert



Jan. 3, 2003 | Time magazine's year-end double issue, on newsstands until Monday, is bursting with praise for the White House, and specifically Vice President **** Cheney, who receives the red-carpet treatment from the newsweekly. In the loving hands of Time writers, the reclusive V.P. even manages to upstage Cynthia Cooper, Sherron Watkins, and Coleen Rowley, the trio of whistle-blowers who appear on the issue's cover.

The 9,700-word avalanche of Cheney puffery is composed of one long essay, another biographical profile, and a chat with his wife. (Despite the big-time rollout, Time writers didn't land any on-the-record face time with Cheney.) There's also a nifty photo essay at Time.com chronicling Cheney's all-American life: There he is as a Little Leaguer, attending his high school prom, etc.

The centerpiece of Time's package is an essay by Nancy Gibbs that trumpets the Bush-Cheney relationship as "Partnership of the Year." A gauzy, heroic painting of the two men takes up almost a full two-page spread: Below it, the lead runs, "This war has two faces, one a promise, one a growl." You'd think the Time editors and writers had collectively stumbled into a time machine set for 1944. The theme of the package, put together by no fewer than 12 writers and reporters, is that Cheney, with his hard work, discipline, smarts and loyalty ("steady and stalwart") has become "the most powerful deputy ever" -- and has transformed our president into a much more effective leader.

The stories are stocked with laudatory quotes from anonymous White House officials ("With Cheney, it's all logical and deliberate and thought through") and laudatory quotes from on-the-record White House officials ("You can't give him too much information. He just swallows it and asks for more"). Above it all, the high rhetoric of wartime patriotism arches: "Together [Bush and Cheney] are leading us along a rough road with sharp curves, and while we may argue about where we're heading, we have no choice but to follow, because a nation fights as one."

After purple, rally-round-the-flag prose like this, it's not surprising that Cheney's difficulties are given short shrift. The mini-scandal arising from his richly rewarded leadership of the embattled oil-services corporation Halliburton is cursorily discussed at the end of the essay. Halliburton's massive asbestos-related liabilities, and Cheney's efforts as its CEO to limit asbestos lawsuits, are not even mentioned. Even more blatantly, Time frames his refusal to reveal which big-oil honchos met with his energy policy task force as revealing only that "there was something garage-floor quirky about him: the master mechanic knows how to build any car by hand, but he doesn't have a clue about how to sell one." It's a non-critique reminiscent of the New York Times' notorious softball slaps at former special prosecutor Kenneth Starr for having a "tin ear" for public relations.

Time's boosterish coverage is typical of what so many mainstream media outlets have been producing since the Sept. 11 attacks, when it became politically incorrect among bigfoot Beltway journalists to criticize the Bush administration during "wartime." What makes this particular example of flag waving stand out, however -- and not in a good way -- is a little graphic box that appears on Page 90, at the bottom of the fourth page of the Cheney essay, which suggests Time's readers are far less enamored of the Bush White House than the magazine is.

The box highlights the latest results of a CNN/Time poll of 1,006 American adults taken on Dec. 17-18. Among the questions they were asked was whether Cheney "is a leader you can trust." A majority of those polled, 51 percent, said they did not trust him; just 42 percent said they did. For some reason, nowhere in Time's endless, breathless encomium to Cheney can that little detail be found.

Instead, Time wrote that for American anxious about war, "it's not enough for people to like Bush; they have to follow him, and for many, that's easier when he has Cheney marching at his side." Why people would feel better about marching to war behind Cheney when most Americans don't trust him is a knot Time doesn't bother to untangle. Cue "The Star-Spangled Banner"!

As for Bush, his trust ratings are only slightly better. According to the same CNN/Time poll, just 50 percent trust him, while 48 percent do not. Basically it's a tie, given the poll's margin of error of 3.5 percent. But that doesn't stop Time from insisting, "Most Americans are inclined to give Bush the benefit of the doubt; they trust his motives and approve of his performance." Most Americans?

The same poll found that just 55 percent of Americans approve of the way Bush is handling his job, while 37 percent disapprove. The 55 percent is a bit of a jaw-dropper, because since 9/11, when Bush's job-approval scores skyrocketed, he's never dipped as low as 55 in any major poll. In fact, the 55 rivals Bush's lowest approval ratings since he took office two years ago. Yet Time made absolutely no mention of the poll results within the text of its exhaustive year-end study of the White House.

What's even more astounding is that Bush's numbers, according to the CNN/Time poll, cratered right after the November midterm elections, which were widely seen as a triumph for the White House. Reading the printed graphics of the Time poll, it appears Bush's approval ratings dropped 7 points between mid-November and mid-December, while his disapproval rating climbed an additional 7 points during the same time frame. In other words, there was a 14-point swing in just 30 days, yet Time doesn't consider that to be newsworthy.

It's true Bush's ratings have been on a slow, steady decline for months, coming down from historic highs following 9/11. But it's telling that the December dip in the CNN/Time poll followed a modest October-to-November gain for Bush in the same survey. That means his job approval ratings took a U-turn for the worse last month, his first in more than a year.

What could account for the sharp change? Take a look at the answers to the poll question about a possible war with Iraq: "Should the U.S. attack nations that harbor terrorists or have weapons of mass destruction even if these countries have not attacked the U.S. first?" Of the respondents, 43 percent agreed with the White House's new policy of preemption; 46 percent disagreed. Those are woeful numbers for an administration that has spent the past 12 months trying to build public support for war.

It seems obvious Time was determined to end the year with a laudatory package on Cheney and Bush, our wartime leaders. And when its own survey revealed some startling, unflattering data that didn't fit in with the magazine's glowing prose, Time simply buried it and hoped no one would notice.
__________________
Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
chequita guevara is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 16:42   #2
Imran Siddiqui
staff
Apolytoners Hall of FameAge of Nations TeamPolyCast Team
 
Imran Siddiqui's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: on the corner of Peachtree and Peachtree
Posts: 30,698
Oh no... he didn't stay at the 90% since 9/11. What a jaw dropper . Please.

And WHAT year end exhaustive study of the White House?! I GET Time, and they simply named Cheney and Bush the 'Partnership of the Year', indicating the article was simply about the relationship between the two!

And Time hasn't critisized Bush after 9/11? What is this guy reading?

What an inflamatory and fact-ignoring piece of propaganda crap, che!
__________________
“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Imran Siddiqui is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 17:33   #3
Lefty Scaevola
lifer
Emperor
 
Lefty Scaevola's Avatar
 
Local Time: 08:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Posts: 3,815
Quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
What an inflamatory and fact-ignoring piece of propaganda crap, che!
Its the only dialect that Che understands.
__________________
Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
"Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"
Lefty Scaevola is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 18:10   #4
Nubclear
NationStatesCall to Power II Democracy GameInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamRise of Nations MultiplayerACDG The Human HiveNever Ending StoriesACDG The Free DronesACDG The Cybernetic ConsciousnessGalCiv Apolyton EmpireACDG3 SpartansC4DG Team Alpha CentauriansCiv4 SP Democracy GameDiplomacyAlpha Centauri PBEMCivilization IV PBEMAlpha Centauri Democracy GameACDG Peace
PolyCast Thread Necromancer
 
Nubclear's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: We are all Asher now.
Posts: 1,437


Being your usual selves, eh?
Nubclear is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 21:07   #5
DanS
Apolytoners Hall of FameApolyCon 06 Participants
Deity
 
DanS's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
55% approval rating? I'm going to need to see some backup for that. Thanks.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
DanS is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 21:14   #6
VJ
King
 
VJ's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 2,247
Quote:
What an inflamatory and fact-ignoring piece of propaganda crap, che!
Umm... no?
VJ is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 21:24   #7
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
It's hard to find good satistics on the net. Gallup's site wants you to pay before they show you anything and cnn's most recent article on Bush's approval rating is from May of 2001.
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.
Oerdin is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 21:38   #8
Demerzel
Warlord
 
Local Time: 13:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
I wonder why Bush's approval rating is slipping....hmmm....

Is it because he seems anxious to shed American blood in attacks on Iraq and North Korea? Wonder why the American public aren't ecstatic about his hawkish policies?
Demerzel is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 21:40   #9
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
No one's said anything about attacking North Korea. Let's stick to the facts.
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.
Oerdin is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 21:51   #10
Demerzel
Warlord
 
Local Time: 13:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
Quote:
from CNN
While Bush administration officials said they are continuing to work diplomatically, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warned North Korea not to assume that the United States was not capable of acting militarily on two fronts, even as it prepares for a war with Iraq.
Okay true that's not saying they are going to attack North Korea but it's not exactly a subtle threat when they are saying they could if they wanted to. Considering that Bush seems intent on attacking Iraq, I'd be worried about what measures he considers appropriate for North Korea if his "tailored containment" policy fails.
Demerzel is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 21:59   #11
Oerdin
Deity
 
Oerdin's Avatar
 
Local Time: 06:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In a bamboo forest hiding from Dale.
Posts: 17,436
The truth is no one's going to invade North Korea because they have an alliance with communist China and the U.S. doesn't want to disrupt the profitable trade ties. Just about every U.S. multinational is no manufacturing their junk in China to save employment costs and Bush doesn't want to hurt U.S. businesses.

North Korea has China to protect them but who does Iraq have? No one since they've alienated all of their neighbors.
__________________
Christianity is the belief in a cosmic Jewish zombie who can give us eternal life if we symbolically eat his flesh and blood and telepathically tell him that we accept him as our lord and master so he can remove an evil force present in all humanity because a woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from an apple tree.
Oerdin is offline  
Old January 3, 2003, 22:17   #12
Demerzel
Warlord
 
Local Time: 13:40
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
Most of Iraq's neighbours aren't exactly fond of him but neither are they particulary keen on America attacking Iraq unless they have some damn good evidence to prove their case.

I think Bush is forgetting how hard it was to create and hold together the coalition for the gulf war. He's already publicly stated IIRC that he'll unilaterally attack Iraq if necessary without realising that such a move would alienate pretty much all the middle eastern nations ( which he needs for bases to attack from ), let alone most of his allies in the EU, Russia, China, etc...
Demerzel is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team