New Imperialism 1870 Game - Page 7

JamesJKirk · September 2, 2003, 11:51

I think this would be your turn, Darius, right?

Darius871 · September 2, 2003, 12:04

Yeah, I noticed it this morning before heading out.

academia · September 29, 2003, 15:39

So... this one is dead, right?
yes or no?

JamesJKirk · September 29, 2003, 15:56

What might be ideal, efficient and even practical, would be to decide which games should live, which should die, and then consolidate all willing players into a game or two, and go from there. If there were less games, it'd probably be easier to keep those couple alive rather than have 4 or however many semi-morose ones.

This would be one I'd vote to kill, btw

EDIT:
PS, academia, isn't it your turn in the Another Imp 1870 game?

academia · September 29, 2003, 16:13

Damn!! you are right...

I might have accidentaly pressed the "unsuscribe" button!
I don´t see that thread in my "Subscribed Threads" list

EmuGod · September 29, 2003, 17:36

Quote:

Originally posted by JamesJKirk
What might be ideal, efficient and even practical, would be to decide which games should live, which should die, and then consolidate all willing players into a game or two, and go from there. If there were less games, it'd probably be easier to keep those couple alive rather than have 4 or however many semi-morose ones.

This would be one I'd vote to kill, btw

EDIT:
PS, academia, isn't it your turn in the Another Imp 1870 game?

Who are we to decide which games should live and which should die? Don't they all deserve a chance to live? How can we play G-d with the games?

JamesJKirk · September 29, 2003, 21:03

We created them, we can destroy them

Seriously, we'd just decide by consensus, I mean it's almost all the same people in each game, so it wouldn't be too problematic. If someone is in a game that's killed then they would probably be able to fill up a spot in another game anyway, right? If it would get things going again with these games, then I'd say it's worth it, wouldn't you?