Anyone for Iron Curtain PBEM? - Page 10

jim panse · May 11, 2003, 05:07

NATO will not accept any further expansion of Soviet influence in the Caribbean.

FiGu · May 11, 2003, 06:18

The US Goverment does not accept soviet expansion in the caribean sea!

Some Communist Transports has been spotted near the japanese island..

President Lyndon B. Johnsson held a speech for the nation:
"Yesterday did US recon vessels locate soviet and chinese transports near the japanese island, at the same time did cuban paratroopers occupy the city of Santo Domingo. This situation has let to future expansion of communism."

At the same time, did the United States of America go to Defcon 3

EmuGod · May 11, 2003, 13:26

The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics assures the United States of America that we have no intention of threatening the United States. "Communism if not your enemy, but rather your fear of Communism has created your fear and hate toward us." the Soviet chairman said in an address to the American president. The chairman also announced a formal invitation by the USSR to the USA to come to Dresden for a summit regarding the future of Haiti. "You have nothing to fear but fear itself." the Soviet chairman added, assuring the United States that the new situation in Haiti poses no threat to the United States.

Choke · May 11, 2003, 15:17

The Premier is insulted at this obvious propaganda, there is no such transport.

jim panse · May 12, 2003, 06:49

NATO Chairman Manlio Brosio warned the USSR: Be advised that the Free World will not accept any step further. This is the situation where the line is drawn. Till here but not further. Be warned theat the Free World will neither tolerate nor accept any further expansion of the USSR and its Warsaw Pact Allies.
United the Free World stands in its struggle against the imperialistic Soviet Union.

EmuGod · May 12, 2003, 18:12

The USSRwishes to remind NATO and the United States of the Atlantic Charter that Britain and the US signed in 1940 which fully granted the people of each nation the right to choose their own government. If the people of Haiti decide they wish to have a Socialist regime, under your treaty you must accept it, just as we will accept whatever decision they may make, including one to have a capitalist regime in the area. We can discuss the matter further in the summit to which you are invited (pm me).

Iron Chancellor · May 12, 2003, 20:14

Uh, Emu, can you produce documentation of the Haitian people requesting that the Cuban communists install a regime there which is verifiable by an independent organization?

By the way, SEATO firmly believes in the Monroe Doctrine, and what many are calling the Chancellor Doctrine, which are that communism will not be allowed to expand beyond its 1962 borders (excluding Persia and Afghanistan) in the Americas and East Asia, respectively.

EmuGod · May 12, 2003, 20:57

The forces moved in as peacekeepers to prevent the MExicans from further expansion. If you will notice they also invaded El Salvador. The Haitan people will be allowed to choose their government as the fighting ends. The USSR would like to remind the world that Nicaragua represented by Managua is a Soviet ally and that if it falls into Mexican hands, the USSR will take steps to liberate it. Just what is wrong with Communism beside the fact that you don't agree with it? Who are you to impose on the people of South East Asia and Latin America your government style. Do not start claiming we do not respect other countries' right to choose their governments when you yourselves do not do the same. Israel contains the kibbutz, a Communist system of life. Why can you accept Israel with Communism and not any other place? Your anti-communist feelings have blinded you to the fact that both can live together in peace. The USSR has repeatedly invited all the capitalist powers to join it in a summit to discuss the future of Haiti, because WE CAN live in peace, but you have chosen thus far rather to make threats at us and not to speak to us directly. That is your choice, but history will remember and appropriately judge your actions.

Iron Chancellor · May 12, 2003, 22:21

Uh, Emu, hate to do this, but this is what, 1965? Anastasio Somoza, a US ally, is still in power in Nicaragua, which probably ought to be an independent city, but oh well. Somoza will be overthrown by the Sandinistas in about ten years...Damn Mexicans...

BTW every people in our nations has the choice to support a communist regime if they get enough of a majority, which is more than can be said for your nation. The simple fact is that the majority of South East Asians do not believe in communism and support a tough foreign policy against it.

EmuGod · May 12, 2003, 22:27

I'm letting the world know now that I'm moving in on Nicaragua if it falls to the independents so don't be alarmed. It isnt a very major city anyway.

EmuGod · May 12, 2003, 23:02

So the people have the choice, but you beleive in a doctrine that does not allow its expansion. That's hypocritical and you know it. To say it can expand but then to say you won't let it is the same as outlawing it altogether. At least that way you wont have to use propoganda on the socialists in your country to make them think they might be able to make changes in your country.

jim panse · May 13, 2003, 03:22

Quote:

Originally posted by EmuGod
The USSRwishes to remind NATO and the United States of the Atlantic Charter that Britain and the US signed in 1940 which fully granted the people of each nation the right to choose their own government. If the people of Haiti decide they wish to have a Socialist regime, under your treaty you must accept it, just as we will accept whatever decision they may make, including one to have a capitalist regime in the area. We can discuss the matter further in the summit to which you are invited (pm me).

NATO wishes to remind the USSR that also the Soviet Government has signed the Atlantic Charter ...

SO =>

Quote:

Be advised that the Free World will not accept any step further. This is the situation where the line is drawn. Till here but not further. Be warned theat the Free World will neither tolerate nor accept any further expansion of the USSR and its Warsaw Pact Allies.

*nothing more to add*

Choke · May 13, 2003, 04:25

Respectfully...everyone shut up and play.

Iron Chancellor · May 13, 2003, 08:44

Emu, you seem to experience a gap in your understanding of the organization of a democracy:
Most South East Asians are anti-communist, thus the policy of SEATO as its elected government is to be anti-communist. If enough pro-communist people organize, they will elect pro-communist representatives, who, if in the majority, will be able to set a friendlier policy. It is not hypocritical, it is fair.

Choke · May 13, 2003, 14:27

Quote:

Originally posted by Iron Chancellor
Emu, you seem to experience a gap in your understanding of the organization of a democracy:
Most South East Asians are anti-communist, thus the policy of SEATO as its elected government is to be anti-communist. If enough pro-communist people organize, they will elect pro-communist representatives, who, if in the majority, will be able to set a friendlier policy. It is not hypocritical, it is fair.

and of course:

Respectfully...everyone shut up and play.

Choke · May 13, 2003, 16:07

Chinese industry surges forth as Beijing announces the completion of an Assembly Plant!

The Chinese military gets ever stronger and moves into position to annihilate SEATO.

The Chinese navy blocks all sea traffic in the Korea Straight.

Choke · May 13, 2003, 16:07

Double post.

FiGu · May 25, 2003, 05:18

A Great Bump!!

Iron Chancellor · May 25, 2003, 09:54

strange...I haven't been receiving updates...My turn will be up shortly.

Iron Chancellor · May 25, 2003, 10:18

SEATO forces today engaged and destroyed a Chinese transport off Taiwan after it refused to allow a boarding party to inspect it. Meanwhile, new divisions are being moved to the Philippines and Thailand to bolster the line against Communist aggression.

Secretary-General Robert Chancellor stated that while SEATO still wishes for a sort of peaceful co-existence with China, further aggressive actions will be seen as the precipitors to all-out war.

As a sign of friendliness, SEATO requests the Army of the People's Republic of China henceforth cease the militarization of Vietnam and engage in a general cease-fire. If the Army of the PRC will do such, on good faith the SEATO military will do likewise.

Premier Chou En-lai is invited to a summit in Darwin, Australia, to discuss the future of the region.

SEATO asks for the unconditional support of the United States and USSR (and yes, NATO) in ending this war.

Finally, SEATO would like to offer the Arab states a free-trade agreement, starting with mutual investments in Pakistan and in Egypt.

EmuGod · May 25, 2003, 13:50

You can't just invite everyone to a conference now! I invited everyone first, they should come to MY conference! I never got a response about the caribbean, so I'll add the South East Asian conflict to the list of things on my conference. I find it strange that the USA and NATO start complaining about the caribbean but haven't responded to my numerous invitations to discuss the matter. So agree to come to my conference. I believe it was in Dresden, Germany. Do you mind coming over to the DRG, Iron Chancellor?

Choke · May 25, 2003, 13:58

China did NOTHING to provoke any attack and the PRC has NOTHING to do with the militarization of Vietnam. SEATO attacked the PRC unprovoked, and it will pay. There will be no conference, no peace, no mercy for SEATO.

Iron Chancellor · May 25, 2003, 15:28

Actually, China, you may not have, but you are continuing very aggressive policies instated by your predecessor. (I think I hardly need to bring up the innocent SEATO forces dastardly massacred on Hainan a year ago by your illustrious predecessor).

We seek peace. We have asked for peace. We will continue to desire peace. However, any further move by your part will seal your fate. Whether you like it our not, history is on our side. We will leave you in the dust.

Choke · May 25, 2003, 17:39

A nuclear arsenal is on China's side. If SEATO forces trespassed on Hainan, they deserved to die. SEATO says it desires peace...this is hard to believe considering there have been NO acts of aggression directed toward SEATO, SEATO brought all this on themselves, they have sown a whirlwind and they will reap it.

Iron Chancellor · May 25, 2003, 20:47

Uh, aggression being the execution of unsuspecting soldiers whose only crime was landing on an unoccupied island to view the carry-out of a cease-fire agreement which China has not yet fulfilled (Hue->America).
SEATO has received motions of support from NATO and the USA. Bring it on.

Choke · May 25, 2003, 21:07

They landed on Chinese soil! There is NO excuse for that. SEATO started this war, China will finish it.

Iron Chancellor · May 25, 2003, 22:25

So what about all those Chinese Viet Cong in Hue, a city belonging to South Vietnam?

EmuGod · May 26, 2003, 00:29

Academia made a mistake when he named the city Hue. In his new version he renamed it to Dong Hoi. It's supposed to be North Vietnamese.

Iron Chancellor · May 26, 2003, 10:19

Ah, but would a city by any other name be less important?

EmuGod · May 26, 2003, 20:02

No, I'm just trying to explain to you that it is meant to be a city in North Vietnam not in the south.