|
View Poll Results: Shall this amendment be passed?
|
|
Yea
|
|
11 |
44.00% |
Nay
|
|
12 |
48.00% |
Abstain
|
|
2 |
8.00% |
|
January 17, 2003, 23:21
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MN,USA
Posts: 967
|
Amendment#2
The Court, in its deliberations about an issue, can find a "spirit of the law" exception or interpretation to the printed wording of the law so long as 4 of the 5 Judges agree. This will be Article VI Clause 7.
__________________
“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
If he did he's an idiot and deserved to die. But I doubt it. -- Theben on Whoha's attack in Society 8.
|
|
|
|
January 17, 2003, 23:24
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: of the Free World
Posts: 7,296
|
Fair enough.
|
|
|
|
January 18, 2003, 15:12
|
#3
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MN,USA
Posts: 967
|
bump
__________________
“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
If he did he's an idiot and deserved to die. But I doubt it. -- Theben on Whoha's attack in Society 8.
|
|
|
|
January 18, 2003, 17:23
|
#4
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MN,USA
Posts: 967
|
bump
__________________
“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
If he did he's an idiot and deserved to die. But I doubt it. -- Theben on Whoha's attack in Society 8.
|
|
|
|
January 18, 2003, 18:05
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
|
. There is no reason to take power away from the Court.
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.
"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
|
|
|
|
January 18, 2003, 19:02
|
#6
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: of the Free World
Posts: 7,296
|
enough bumping... it's an ammendment vote, so it will be topped as long as it has a fair chance of passing.
|
|
|
|
January 18, 2003, 19:50
|
#7
|
Prince
Local Time: 08:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Minneapolis Kansas
Posts: 712
|
Is this an attempt to formalize what the spremes do on a regular basis, or an attempt to limit same by requiring a super majority?
It appears to be both. I am torn.
__________________
I used to be a builder. That was before I played Civ III
|
|
|
|
January 18, 2003, 19:53
|
#8
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MN,USA
Posts: 967
|
This is attempt to block people from appoiting juges based on this issue.
__________________
“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
If he did he's an idiot and deserved to die. But I doubt it. -- Theben on Whoha's attack in Society 8.
|
|
|
|
January 18, 2003, 20:16
|
#9
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
|
Right now, it is established by previous decisions that the court can rule on the spirit of the law whenever it wants. Thus this clearly limits it and does not formalize any power that needs formalizing
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.
"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
|
|
|
|
January 19, 2003, 13:12
|
#10
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Botanic Garden, Rio
Posts: 5,124
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by civman2000
Right now, it is established by previous decisions that the court can rule on the spirit of the law whenever it wants. Thus this clearly limits it and does not formalize any power that needs formalizing
|
I agree with this. Could you post a link to that decision, please?
(I know, I'm too lazy to find it by myself... )
|
|
|
|
January 20, 2003, 00:45
|
#11
|
Prince
Local Time: 06:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: of my banana plantation
Posts: 702
|
I had to say Nay because 4 out of 5 is too restruictive. Leave that part out and it would have my vote.
Mss
__________________
Remember.... pillage first then burn.
|
|
|
|
January 20, 2003, 08:52
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: of the Martian Empire
Posts: 4,969
|
Aro: There was no decision that explicitly said it. However, several decisions used the principle of judging the spirit of the constitution ( Case 5, Case 7, and Case 9 specifically come to mind)
__________________
Ham grass chocolate.
"This should be the question they ask you before you get to vote. If you answer 'no', then they brand you with a giant red 'I' on your forehead and you are forever barred from taking part in the electoral process again."--KrazyHorse
"I'm so very glad KH is Canadian."--Donegeal
|
|
|
|
January 20, 2003, 09:12
|
#13
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Botanic Garden, Rio
Posts: 5,124
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by civman2000
Aro: There was no decision that explicitly said it. However, several decisions used the principle of judging the spirit of the constitution (Case 5, Case 7, and Case 9 specifically come to mind)
|
Thanks, civman2000.
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 21:14
|
#14
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: of España
Posts: 811
|
This bill seems unnecessary.
__________________
Note: the Law Offices of jdjdjd are temporarily closed.
"Next time I say something like 'lets go to Bolivia', lets go to Bolivia"
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 22:02
|
#15
|
King
Local Time: 06:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Bringer of Peace, Destroyer of Worlds
Posts: 2,192
|
Nay to this. Not necessary, like jdjdjd mentioned above.
|
|
|
|
January 23, 2003, 02:21
|
#16
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Botanic Garden, Rio
Posts: 5,124
|
MJW, I think this amendment failed. I'll detop the thread, ok?
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39.
|
|