Hall of Fame Voting - Page 8

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:12

*sniggers*

He did run a democracy game I think, though that and your opinion aren't necessarily mutually exclusive.

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 17:16

Nor are the mutually inclusive.

War4ever · February 8, 2003, 17:19

i am just farking with you...no offence meant.....

i too would like to be in, i have been here long enough, and despite Seans lame attempts to say i suck, i have helped change strategies in our little gaming circle....

of course i have spammed my @ss off too

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 17:22

You still have yet to even approach even my PPD count.

According to some people who were keeping track (God knows why), I had over 35 posts per day for well over 2 months for a while.

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:23

Hehe so are you definitely in Trip? Or are they still counting?

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:25

Quote:

Originally posted by Trip
According to some people who were keeping track (God knows why), I had over 35 posts per day for well over 2 months for a while.

Bloody hell, even War (or myself he will no doubt respond

) didn't keep up that sort of rate when he was trying to overtake Rah.

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 17:27

Nah... but I got into the top 10. I got around 50 votes total though this round, so if I get anywhere near that next time then I'll be in, since the top 2 had around 70.

War4ever · February 8, 2003, 17:30

actually a couple of weekends ago i had 200 post in 8 hours or something like that....really dumb

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 17:31

I had 180 posts at the Paradox forums in 2 days (which included about 3 hours of posting).

I could take Ming if I really wanted to, but it's not worth sacrificing all other things in life.

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:31

Quote:

Originally posted by War4ever
actually a couple of weekends ago i had 200 post in 8 hours or something like that....really dumb

I do notice you are 160 above Rah now but it was only a week or so ago you passed him.

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:34

Quote:

Originally posted by Trip
I could take Ming if I really wanted to, but it's not worth sacrificing all other things in life.

I don't think it is practically possible. :stir: :stir:

Seriously, you would need 35 posts a day just to catch him in around about a year and a half.

I sincerely believe noone would have that much spamming stamina.

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 17:39

I could get 1000 a week, if necassary.

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:43

I don't think you could get 1000 without crossing the line from actual spam to actual blatant spam. Ming will defend his lead and it wont be hard for him to make a case with you spamming 1000 posts a week.

Besides that's over a hundred a day......I doubt you could do it for a week (let alone much longer as you would need to to catch Ming) even if you didn't get restricted. :challenge:

rah · February 8, 2003, 17:44

Naw, that kind of volume would be impossible keeping the appearence of thoughtful dialoge. Any hint of spamming doing it would probably attract the attention of the PCR police.

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 17:47

Nah.

I'd just post once or twice or 3 times in every every thread in every forum I visit here (about 5 or 6). If they're all on-topic, then any claims of spam would be completely falsified.

That's why I said I wasn't willing to sacrifice my life... it would be a challenge.

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 17:53

I don't think you could keep it up for long, I really don't, even if you avoid attention from the mods.

Whilst at home after Christmas I made 150 or so posts in a week and that was heavy posting. What you propose is nearly posting that much every day, for week after week after week.

It's not possible.

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 17:54

Don't you dare challenge me to do it, next week is exams week...

rah · February 8, 2003, 17:58

Quote:

Originally posted by Trip
Don't you dare challenge me to do it, next week is exams week...

Yes,

please don't do it when you should be studying.

And Announcing it would also be kinda dumb. Especially since I'm one of those PCR police.

And at any given time I can monitor what threads you're reading and what threads you're posting to.

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 18:00

If they're on-topic then I can say anything relationed to this discussion was posted by my roomate.

Besides, at the rate I'd be going, even a 15% PCR wouldn't make a dent in my effort.

rah · February 8, 2003, 18:04

Challenges work both ways

We're given a lot of leeway here.

Ming · February 8, 2003, 19:25

Quote:

Originally posted by Trip
If they're on-topic then I can say anything relationed to this discussion was posted by my roomate.

Besides, at the rate I'd be going, even a 15% PCR wouldn't make a dent in my effort.

Spam is in the eyes of the beholder

And intent is good enough to nail you.

Oh, and I've given out FAR higher PCR's than 15%
100% has been done to MANY people

Trust me when I say that if you started posting at that kind of level, you would be nailed to the wall.

War4ever · February 8, 2003, 20:09

lol *runs and hides*

rah · February 8, 2003, 21:12

Why? Feeling guilty or something

Jon Shafer · February 8, 2003, 22:08

I guess Ming doesn't like commited community members... oh well...

DrSpike · February 8, 2003, 22:22

Quote:

Originally posted by Trip
I guess Ming doesn't like commited community members... oh well...

If you post 1000 times in any week then sure you should be committed.

The men in white coats are watching.

Ming · February 9, 2003, 11:56

Quote:

Originally posted by Trip
I guess Ming doesn't like commited community members... oh well...

I think commited community members are great...

I think spammers should get PCR's to teach them not to spam

War4ever · February 9, 2003, 14:06

this is why i am committed to posting ON TOPIC

Ming · February 10, 2003, 05:38

Posting relevent thoughts in ON TOPIC threads and being a good communtiy member doesn't mean that you also aren't a spammer