|
View Poll Results: Should these boreholes be built?
|
|
Red: Yes
|
|
6 |
16.67% |
Red: No
|
|
6 |
16.67% |
Blue: Yes
|
|
7 |
19.44% |
Blue: No
|
|
5 |
13.89% |
Green: Yes
|
|
7 |
19.44% |
Green: No
|
|
5 |
13.89% |
Write-in
|
|
0 |
0% |
Xenobanana
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
January 21, 2003, 21:42
|
#1
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:54
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Official: More Centralis boreholes?
Poll will last 2 days.
The Red borehole will not cause ecodamage and will be crawled for energy by the Tacticus Academy former already there; the other two will, and will be worked by the bases they are next to.
EDIT: See below for the correct map.
Last edited by GeneralTacticus; January 21, 2003 at 21:55.
|
|
|
|
January 21, 2003, 21:54
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:54
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
F*cking hell. This really doesn't seem to want to post the right images. I'll see if it works this time.
|
|
|
|
January 21, 2003, 23:37
|
#3
|
King
Local Time: 09:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
All 3, especially the no eco-damage one.
Question: Would any of the un-used land south of TA be suitable for a borehole? Perhaps 6,92? Also, could a borehole be drilled on the far end of the two-square peninsula west of Antioch (5,83)? Or are there bases planned for these areas and/or are they not under your jurisdiction?
edit: there's also the 19,91 spot 2 squares east of the Capital and the 15,81 spot 2 squares north of TBIBTU.
Last edited by Cedayon; January 21, 2003 at 23:51.
|
|
|
|
January 21, 2003, 23:54
|
#4
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:54
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Those areas would be quite suitable for borehole construction, and AFAIK, there are no bases planned for there ATM.
As for whether I have jurisdiction over them; for the Antioch peninsula, undoubtedly; for the area south of TA, I'd say it's a kind of null zone, which no-one currently governs because no-one has any use for it, so I don't see what's to stop me from at least proposing some borehole consturction there.
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 00:11
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 09:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
One on the Antioch Peninsula would be nice (it would be vulnerable to shore bombardment, but still).
The 6,92 spot of TA is just one square outside the base radius, and quite distant from any other base, so I don't think anyone has a better claim than you. Perhaps, though, that region could be more efficiently developed as an energy park. It depends on how many crawlers we want to post there.
I think it would be prudent to drill as many boreholes away from population centers (ie outside base radii) as is feasible, so that fewer boreholes and other undersirable-in-ones-backyard improvements need to be built near the bases. It is nice to get both the minerals and energy from one, though.
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 08:36
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 16:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tyskland
Posts: 1,952
|
Yes yes YES w/o even looking at the Pic ;=)
__________________
Stopped waiting for Duke Nukem
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 09:35
|
#7
|
Deity
Local Time: 15:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: On a Board Walk
Posts: 11,565
|
Well as promised I voted no. Why don't you be the first to build some echelon mirrors
__________________
"Four things come not back: the spoken word, the sped arrow, the past life and the neglected opportunity."
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 09:37
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:54
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Because, as yet, I see nowhere where they would be of any use. It might be better to use them in the area south of TA, but then again, it might not. I'll use whichever option is most effective.
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 11:09
|
#9
|
Local Time: 14:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oxford or Northampton, England
Posts: 8,116
|
No on all, though if the red one passes, I won't be too upset. If it doesn't create eco-damage, it's not too bad. If you wish to blight your landscape it is not such a problem to me. When it comes to the eco-damage, I voted no, as I do not wish the people to be subjected to the fear of worm rape. But then, all of this is pretty predictable from me by now
__________________
Smile
For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
But he would think of something
"Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 18:00
|
#10
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
all of them
|
|
|
|
January 22, 2003, 18:26
|
#11
|
Prince
Local Time: 16:54
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 910
|
Yes three times.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54.
|
|