|
View Poll Results: What should it be?
|
|
Gateway's Tech Tree
|
|
11 |
100.00% |
Tech Tree
|
|
0 |
0% |
Tech Field
|
|
0 |
0% |
Tech Sphere
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
January 31, 2003, 16:18
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Apparently on the computer
Posts: 463
|
"The Tech Vote" (Part 2)
Just vote and continue the earlier discussion that was located in the other Technology Poll .
I vote for Gateways Tech. Tree.
-J.B.-
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2003, 16:33
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 17:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 3,801
|
The natural choice; GW's tech tree.
__________________
"Kids, don't listen to uncle Solver unless you want your parents to spank you." - Solver
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2003, 16:40
|
#3
|
Emperor
Local Time: 14:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Missouri / Misery; CC
Posts: 3,042
|
I like what I saw of Gateway's idea. It's a tree with leaves and effective blocks on beelines. Even if we disagree on some details, such as variable/hidden prerequisites, that can be very easily changed.
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2003, 17:19
|
#4
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 15:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 78
|
Yeah, go gateway tech tree!
__________________
Michiel Helvensteijn
--
SPDT Member: Helpmate
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2003, 06:52
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 15:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: soon to be a major religion
Posts: 2,845
|
duh......go gateway
__________________
Bunnies!
Welcome to the DBTSverse!
God, Allah, boedha, siva, the stars, tealeaves and the palm of you hand. If you are so desperately looking for something to believe in GO FIND A MIRROR
'Space05us is just a stupid nice guy' - Space05us
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2003, 09:20
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 15:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 2,247
|
GW's
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2003, 15:03
|
#7
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 15:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 78
|
It's the most logical course of action. - Tuvok
I am curious how (and more importantly, when) it's gonna be coded. And how it's gonna look. Can we even call Gateway's tech model a 'tree'? I guess not, because the technologies won't even be known to the player untill he/she has the required primary pre-requisites. It would be cool if we could somehow make it a real tech-tree. (Maybe add the new tech to the tree when it's known, connected to the required techs.) I'd like to help with that, btw.
__________________
Michiel Helvensteijn
--
SPDT Member: Helpmate
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2003, 17:42
|
#8
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Apparently on the computer
Posts: 463
|
heh this poll is hereby closed by me, I can see that everyone will pick Gateways. I cant blame them.
-J.B.-
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2003, 17:47
|
#9
|
Prince
Local Time: 07:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Apparently on the computer
Posts: 463
|
Michiel,
I am glad to see your interest in the Technological development of this project. I will consider your request. I am willing to find tech's involved but I will leave the Tech tree stuff to Gateway or someone else who is interested. IE: Michiel.
Any, or all person(s) willing to work on this can post here. From this time on.
Rasbey and I will then need to "TALK" to each other by Instant Messenger so that we can asses the situation.
-J.B.-
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2003, 19:18
|
#10
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 15:29
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 78
|
Here's what I mean by a tree with Gateway's method:
Of course, there'll have to be a good Tree-GUI. The information in a seperate window (not like in my images), the tech itself in the tree as an image, like in civ-3.
__________________
Michiel Helvensteijn
--
SPDT Member: Helpmate
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29.
|
|