February 5, 2003, 05:04
|
#31
|
King
Local Time: 17:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,747
|
yeah fairline, i "closed" your ZSU-57 and i also removed the designer initials because i add a file containing the unit credits to the scenario. and the canberra will also be changed.
btw, has anyone a U-2 Recon Aircraft graphic?!
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 09:21
|
#32
|
King
Local Time: 17:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,747
|
Ok guys, here is version 0.9 (playtest) any bugs or something like bugs i´d like to have reported. thanks and have fun.
part 1
should include: units.gif, terrain1.gif, terrain2.gif, title.gif, cities.gif, people.gif.
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 09:26
|
#33
|
King
Local Time: 17:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,747
|
part 2
should include: coldwarcrisis.scn, events.txt, game.txt, labels.txt, pedia.txt, readme.txt, rules.txt, unit credits.txt.
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 09:27
|
#34
|
King
Local Time: 17:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,747
|
and finally the introducing text document (coldwarcrisis.txt).
anyone else interested in a pbem playtest? academia was the only one who wanted to do so.
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 11:59
|
#35
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Castellón, Spain
Posts: 3,571
|
I can´t download the coldwarcrisis.txt fille
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 12:00
|
#36
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 368
|
Looks great, but upon independent inspection, I found that all rebel cities had 4-6 rebel units in them, so perhaps you should tweak them down a little.
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 12:09
|
#37
|
King
Local Time: 17:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,747
|
RULES.TXT UPDATE!!!!!!!
please download the rules.txt attached below and thanks fairline, your units helped me a lot.
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 12:17
|
#38
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 368
|
Also, little misspelling of the Soviet leader's name, should be Khrushchev, not Krushchev.
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 14:41
|
#39
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
Comment:
YOU STOLE MY TITLE.GIF!!!!!
I´m gonna sue you!!!!!
No, seriously speaking... I think you should use your own title.gif! A new one, original.
Think about this: 2 Scenarios with the same Title.gif? Mmm... do you really like that?
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:08
|
#40
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
Regarding unit credits.txt:
* I found the initials "DC" in the Spy Satellite pic in one of my units galleries
* F-4B Phantom II: I think that´s made by BeBro
* Su-15 Flagon: I think BeBro too
* F-111A Aardvark: Mmm... Bebro?
* B-52 Stratofortress: Andrew Livings
* Mirage V:
* SSBN Submarine: Mmm... Andrew Livings too?
* SSN Submarine: Andrew Livings
* Tu-95 Bear: I found the initials AC in the pic
* Tu-16 Badger: AC initials too
* Ka-25 Hormone: My conversion of a real Ka-25 photo
* SA-341 Gazelle: My conversion of a real SA-341 photo
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:14
|
#41
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
Nuclear Power:
Mmm... the soviets begin the game with 8 ICBM and 5 MRBM (Total= 13)
And the US: 10 ICBM and 2 MRBM (Total= 12)
Why did you choose that? You know, that´s not accurate...
These are the numbers for 1963:
ICBMS
USA: 424
USSR: 100
Total Nuclear Stockpile in 1963:
USA: 29,249
USSR: 4,248
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:17
|
#42
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
USA-USSR Nuclear Stockpile
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:19
|
#43
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
USA/USSR Strategic Bombers
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:19
|
#44
|
King
Local Time: 17:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,747
|
ok, updated unit credits. thanx to academia
on the title.gif i´m still working
btw, have all of you checked the pbem thread out?
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:21
|
#45
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
USA/USSR Strategic Bomber Weapons
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:23
|
#46
|
King
Local Time: 17:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,747
|
to make it a bit more interesting and funny. imagine a nuclear pre-emptive strike of the US possessing 4-5 times more nukes than the USSR. who do you think will win?!?!?!
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:25
|
#47
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
Quote:
|
ok, updated unit credits. thanx to academia
|
You are welcome
Quote:
|
on the title.gif i´m still working
|
mmm... try here:
http://www.cca.org/woc/links/coldwar.html
You may find interesting soviet propoganda posters in this site
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:28
|
#48
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
Quote:
|
to make it a bit more interesting and funny. imagine a nuclear pre-emptive strike of the US possessing 4-5 times more nukes than the USSR. who do you think will win?!?!?!
|
Ok dude. Your scenario, your choice
I´m just saying that i find it completely unrealistic.
We aren´t talking about a difference of 100 vs. 200 nuclear bombs.
IT´S 29,000 VS 4,000
ENORMOUS DIFFERENCE!!!!
All in all, i think that at least the US should have more nukes than the USSR in your scenario.
That´s all
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:31
|
#49
|
King
Local Time: 17:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,747
|
don´t feel offended but the thing with the nukes is manageable
and i also know the difference was that enormous but just for the reason mentioned above ...... come on, don´t be that cruel
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 15:33
|
#50
|
Emperor
Local Time: 11:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Posts: 5,474
|
Quote:
|
and i also know the difference was that enormous but just for the reason mentioned above ...... come on, don´t be that cruel
|
Offended? no, why should i be?
I just wanted to make myself clear.
As I said:
Your scenario, your choice
Anyway, the most important thing is TO HAVE FUN PLAYING YOUR SCENARIO!!!
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 19:51
|
#51
|
King
Local Time: 15:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: of the wing
Posts: 2,013
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by academia
Regarding unit credits.txt:
* I found the initials "DC" in the Spy Satellite pic in one of my units galleries
* F-4B Phantom II: I think that´s made by BeBro
* Su-15 Flagon: I think BeBro too
* F-111A Aardvark: Mmm... Bebro?
* B-52 Stratofortress: Andrew Livings
* Mirage V:
* SSBN Submarine: Mmm... Andrew Livings too?
* SSN Submarine: Andrew Livings
* Tu-95 Bear: I found the initials AC in the pic
* Tu-16 Badger: AC initials too
* Ka-25 Hormone: My conversion of a real Ka-25 photo
* SA-341 Gazelle: My conversion of a real SA-341 photo
|
Pretty much, Acedemia. Here's some more, Jim:
- AC=Jimmywax
- The T-55-derived units are not mine, they are merely tweaks of BeBro/Curt Sibling originals
- Engineers=Nemo
- Curt Sibling also modified DannyEvilcat's infantry quite a lot; I think they are for a scenario called Soviet Steel (?)
- the Thunderchief is Techumseh
- The BMP-2 (not BTR-60!) is by Jimmywax, not me
I hope you update the credits file, because you have attributed some of these units to me.
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 20:30
|
#52
|
Prince
Local Time: 09:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: in an undisclosed strip club
Posts: 737
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by academia
Regarding unit credits.txt:
* F-4B Phantom II: I think that´s made by BeBro
* Su-15 Flagon: I think BeBro too
|
The F-4 looks like BeBro's but it looks modified, so I am not sure. I am positive the Su-15 isn't his though. He made the F-4 along with several other units for me and that was not one of them. I am sorry though that I am not sure who it belongs too. It might be Curt's or the same person who made the Mirage(Jim?).
Also, I am positive that Andrew Livings has an A-4 that would fit in perfectly with your graphics. I will post it and you can decide. I might also be able to help you with the U-2. I have an idea for it.
__________________
"I would rather have a German division in front of me than a French one behind me." -- General George S. Patton
"Guinness sucks!" -- Me
Last edited by Jimmywax; February 6, 2003 at 14:04.
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 21:55
|
#53
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 610
|
Just a couple bugs...
First, the date doesn't go forward. It goes backward.
Second, I believe "Mossul" is "Mosul," isn't it?
Third, not exactly a bug, but I wouldn't use the "Radio" slot if you don't intend to build more (unlimited movement) railroads. I noticed you don't allow construction of RRs, but you do allow building of airbases. Airbases can act as RRs.
Other than these three things, I love your scenario! An excellent piece of work that I am enjoying regardless of whatever bugs are currently in the game. Be proud.
__________________
-rmsharpe
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 22:14
|
#54
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 610
|
Another thing, when the intelligence angecy wonder is built, it is said it has been "granted," when it of course has been built, not granted.
__________________
-rmsharpe
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 23:23
|
#55
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 368
|
I wish to correct an earlier statement: all rebel cities have 4-5 rebel/neutral armies in them, except for Stockholm and Helsinki, which only had one each and were building cruise missiles
|
|
|
|
February 5, 2003, 23:38
|
#56
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 610
|
Also, when you take a city, IDF infantry appear outside the cities as partisans. How about replacing that non-used slot with the IDF and put a partisan unit in that slot?
__________________
-rmsharpe
|
|
|
|
February 6, 2003, 09:23
|
#57
|
Prince
Local Time: 15:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Freiburg i. Br.
Posts: 331
|
Hey hey! Your scenario looks really cool! Im not the biggest fan of cold war scenarios but this one really could make me play such one!
|
|
|
|
February 6, 2003, 10:26
|
#58
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 368
|
Another nitpick: Shouldn't the UAR be communist? The UAR was highly socialistic, under the control of the Ba'ath Party in Syria and Nasser in Egypt. Political Islam, or Fundamentalism, did not really emerge as a major force until the 1979 Iranian revolution.
The Arab League should probably be a Parliamentary Monarchy, to reflect the powers of the Saudis and the royal families of Jordan, Iraq, Morocco, etc.
|
|
|
|
February 7, 2003, 17:07
|
#59
|
King
Local Time: 16:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dilbert
Posts: 1,839
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by rmsharpe
Just a couple bugs...
First, the date doesn't go forward. It goes backward.
|
The reason for this is simple: the starting date is set as -23549, when it should be simply 23549.
|
|
|
|
February 7, 2003, 18:44
|
#60
|
Prince
Local Time: 10:39
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 610
|
Yeah, I modified it on my own and changed it to the right way.
__________________
-rmsharpe
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39.
|
|