|
View Poll Results: Should this amendment pass? (You have three days)
|
|
Yes.
|
|
6 |
66.67% |
No.
|
|
3 |
33.33% |
Abstain.
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
February 10, 2003, 02:51
|
#1
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Amendment: Revised Polling Rules
I suggest that the constitution should be amnded thus:
(all changed portions in bold)
Under "Article III: Polls"
Section: "Official:"
Add:
Quote:
|
Time Frame:
*No poll may be posted on a particular issue more than once in the period between two turnchats, excepting polls which have been declared invalid.
*The above rule will apply even if a new decision on a particular issue which has already been decided is part of a poll on something else; for example, a poll on a borehole being built on a particular square, if, within the specified period, the people have voted against it, could not be worked into a general terraforming poll.
*In cases where a previous poll is tied, new polls are permitted on the issue, but may only include the options that tied, along with the 'Abstain' or 'Xenonabana' option.
*If a turnchat does not occur within 7 days (168 hours) of the previous poll closing, it is considered to have occurred for the purposes of this amendment, as the opinion of the people may have changed significantly by this time.
|
Discussion thread is here.
You have three days.
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 02:37
|
#2
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
*BUMP*
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 03:05
|
#3
|
Emperor
Local Time: 03:05
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Okay, this amendment passed, just. DBTS, would you please add this to constitution?
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 09:03
|
#4
|
King
Local Time: 11:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by GeneralTacticus
Okay, this amendment passed, just. DBTS, would you please add this to constitution?
|
Oh, that's a good one
When's the last time DBTS added anything to the constitution?
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 11:03
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 16:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: of Xanadu, Scottish Section of the Apolyton Must Crush Capitalism Party
Posts: 1,529
|
__________________
"Just because you're paranoid doesnt mean there's not someone following me..."
"I shall return and I shall be billions"
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 11:19
|
#6
|
Local Time: 18:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
Someone should start a new consitution thread...
*sudden realization when writing the previous sentence* Is this the AT's job?
I hope TKG updated the directory, so I don't have to dig in tens of pages to search all unimplemented amendments...
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 12:20
|
#7
|
King
Local Time: 11:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
Thanks for being on the ball, Maniac
I'm sure all the unimplemented amendments will pop out of the woodwork in due course... usually after someone's violated one of them
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 17:24
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 13:05
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
hmm, i just havn't upgraded the directory for this term yet. you'll notice it's still blank . i'll probably add everything right at the end of the month just when it's time to make a new one
however, AFAIK all previous dir's are complete.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:05.
|
|