|
View Poll Results: Should we hurry the Ascetiv Virtues? If so, how?
|
|
Rush it with cash alone. (around 800 ec)
|
|
14 |
63.64% |
Rush it with crawlers and cash. (2 crawlers and around 600 ec)
|
|
5 |
22.73% |
Don't rush it. Let Morgan have it. (0 ec)
|
|
2 |
9.09% |
Write-in
|
|
0 |
0% |
Abstain
|
|
1 |
4.55% |
|
February 12, 2003, 13:55
|
#1
|
Local Time: 21:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
Official: Hurry the Ascetic Virtues?
GeneralTacticus, governor of Centralis, has in the last turnchat mentioned his desire to rush the Ascetic Virtues after we have discovered Planetary Economics. This because Morgan is only three turns away from building it for himself. There is no way to complete the project without rushing. So if we want that SP, our only opportunity is to hurry it next turn.
Now my question to all citizens is: do you want to rush the AV, and how?
Options are:
Rush it purely with energy credits. (cost: 800 ec)
Rush it with energy credits after the two available crawlers are cashed in. (cost: 600 ec)
Don't rush it. Let Morgan have it. (cost: 0 ec)
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 14:10
|
#2
|
King
Local Time: 14:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
Is this meant to be a multiple choice poll?
edit- I also think those estimates are a tad conservative, since the AV is a 300 min project. The estimates are probably good enough though, if the rushes are done with no overrun.
Last edited by Cedayon; February 12, 2003 at 14:15.
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 14:19
|
#3
|
Local Time: 21:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
Err... no. But I hope I can trust people to vote only on a single option, so I won't have to declare this poll invalid.
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 14:20
|
#4
|
Local Time: 21:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
Ah yes, I calculated those rush costs with zero overrun. Since New Apolyton is producing about 25 minerals, this should mean 25x4=100 less than a full rush.
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 14:23
|
#5
|
King
Local Time: 14:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
Oh, 4 is the multiplier for a SP past 10 mins? I thought it was 3.
Will the "Yes, full ec rush" option count for the "Yes, with 2 crawlers" if neither has 50%+1 votes but are obviously beating "No" if put together?
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 14:41
|
#6
|
Local Time: 21:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Gent, Belgium
Posts: 10,712
|
Yes I think that would be most fair.
(Why do I suddenly get the feeling no one will vote for the second option... )
__________________
Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 14:50
|
#7
|
King
Local Time: 14:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
k, voted rush with cash alone... we're swimming in ecs, this is important, and those crawlers would take time to replace...
Just to let everyone know, this SP will mean that each base can hold 2 more pop units (ie all those 9s can become 11s, even without hab complexes) and the +1 police will mean our military-units-out-of-territory will only cause 1 drone each rather than 2. That's worth 800-900 ecs, considering we've got over 3500, right?
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 18:10
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,783
|
correct. rush it with cash.
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 18:18
|
#9
|
King
Local Time: 21:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Rovaniemi, Lappland
Posts: 1,551
|
virtue is discipline! rush the ascetic virtues! (with cash alone)
__________________
My Words Are Backed With Bad Attitude And VETERAN KNIGHTS!
|
|
|
|
February 12, 2003, 20:34
|
#10
|
Emperor
Local Time: 05:30
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washed up SMAC/X University Specialist
Posts: 3,022
|
Agreed. Rush with cash. Though next time, it would be better if instead of just building the project like this, we continuously build crawlers and used cash to rush those as necessary (Say, when there'd be a greater than 10 overrun after the next turn). It saves a lot when you don't have to rush at 4 credits for every mineral, which is what all SP are.
__________________
Veni Vidi Castravi Illegitimos
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 00:33
|
#11
|
King
Local Time: 12:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,568
|
Cash alone, crawlers could be put to better use.
__________________
You can only curse me to eternal damnation for so long!
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 03:22
|
#12
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: lol ED&D is officially full PvP LOL
Posts: 13,229
|
Rush it with cash alone. Better to have virtue than money.
-Jam
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 03:49
|
#13
|
Emperor
Local Time: 06:30
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
I'd not be so quick to dismiss the use of at least one crawler (even if it is a rather moot point in view of the current voting); one crawler will save us 30 minerals that we would otherwise have to rushbuy, totalling 120 ECs. Given that the crawlers can be produced at a rate of one per turn by our central bases if we wish, this would mean that at the cost of one turn's production, we've effectively produced 120 ECs - quite a good investment, wouldn't you say?
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 09:01
|
#14
|
King
Local Time: 14:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
A crawler or two is definately a good thing for this... and I think you, as Centralis Governor, probably have the authority to "sacrifice" one of your own crawlers... but wouldn't it be better to just keep the crawler and get a few mins/nuts/energy a turn for it? Or save it for something that we actually can't buy? (which would be the Ascent or something like that)
|
|
|
|
February 13, 2003, 12:45
|
#15
|
Warlord
Local Time: 19:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Brussels Belgium
Posts: 123
|
Rush with cash alone. 200 less credits will not make much of a difference now that we are in Free Market mode. Two less crawlers on the other could make a significant difference for the city that will have to sacrify them.
Just my 2 cents on the subject
|
|
|
|
February 14, 2003, 02:56
|
#16
|
Emperor
Local Time: 06:30
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Well, the crawler I had originally planned to use was from TBIBTU, which will have another done next turn and won't miss the extra mineral production in the meantime.
|
|
|
|
February 15, 2003, 06:24
|
#17
|
Prince
Local Time: 21:30
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 653
|
Just ruch how dosn't matter
__________________
What do I care about your suffering? Pain, even agony, is no more than information before the senses, data fed to the computer of the mind. The lesson is simple: you have received the information, now act on it. Take control of the input and you shall become master of the output.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:30.
|
|