February 21, 2003, 13:36
|
#31
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
JB, did Spain at the time of the Armada have an imperial standard? -I put together the flags when doing the medieval patch, which I've used as the foundation for this scen, so thats why I ended up with the castilian one... Castile was after all the epigram of spanish imperialism.
I consider putting Union Jack in too, if just for the national-romantic flavour -AFAIK Union Jack came into use much later. But as I use "Rule Britannia!" as the english conquest theme anyway I might as well go all the way
|
|
|
|
February 21, 2003, 13:55
|
#32
|
Moderator
Local Time: 21:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Valladolid, CA
Posts: 11,884
|
Yes, the Burgundy Cross, see St Leo's post. In Philip II's times, yellow color for the flag's background was more common. Take a look at Allard's scenario on the Dutch revolt. I think Kindal has used that flag as well but I can't remember which scenario. In my Philip II scenario I used a composite flag similar to the royal banner shown in St Leo's post, but the Burgundy Cross is way better.
|
|
|
|
February 22, 2003, 03:47
|
#33
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
This is the flag I use for Spain in europae, as I recall it has been aproved of by all Spanish testers so far
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2003, 07:31
|
#34
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
I'm gonna use the Burgundy cross for Spain, and Union Jack for the english as well
I'm in the process of shining up events, adjusting play balance and adding final bells and whistles... Any other play reports or comments that I should take into consideration?
Does anyone have an idea for a good title ? 'God's Obvious Design' hints at the great irony of the enterprise of the Armada and the failure of it, but doesn't really sound very dramatic... and the short version (GOD) has an inappropriate ring to it.
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2003, 08:12
|
#35
|
Emperor
Local Time: 13:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of the frozen North.
Posts: 4,197
|
How about just "The Armada"?
|
|
|
|
February 28, 2003, 10:42
|
#36
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 94
|
French cities reviewed :
Brieux -> St-Brieuc (St for "Saint")
Bayeaux -> Bayeux
Thx !
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2003, 02:15
|
#37
|
King
Local Time: 14:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: of underdogs
Posts: 1,774
|
Quote:
|
How about just "The Armada"?
|
There's something to be said for simplicity. If you want irony: "The Invincible Armada". If you're tilting toward divine intervention - as were many post-Armada English - Drake called it "the winds of God". Liz, from her address to the army beforehand (and taken completely out of context  ) said, "Let tyrants fear".
What was the final tally of ships lost to storms versus those lost in battle?
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2003, 11:35
|
#38
|
Warlord
Local Time: 14:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada - AECCP member
Posts: 192
|
The Armada was composed of 125-130 ships. 63 were lost. 15 of those were sunk or captured by the English; the rest were nature's fault.
__________________
I refute it thus!
"Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2003, 12:00
|
#39
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Boco
Drake called it "the winds of God".
|
Others even said "God breathed"...
Good suggestions everyone.  -I think I'm leaning towards simply "Armada" ...
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2003, 12:14
|
#40
|
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In search of pants
Posts: 5,085
|
God's Armada
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2003, 12:29
|
#41
|
King
Local Time: 19:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: of the wing
Posts: 2,013
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by hardjoy
I'm gonna use the Burgundy cross for Spain, and Union Jack for the english as well
|
Nice scenario, Hardjoy
Don't use the union flag for England, though - England was very much a separate kingdom from Scotland at the time, so use either the Cross of St George or the Royal Standard.
The Act of Union between England and Scotland was 1707 I think, and the Union Flag dates from that time as well.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2003, 13:38
|
#42
|
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In search of pants
Posts: 5,085
|
Modern Royal Standard
British Royal Standards since 1042
Royal Standards
The last source indicates that the three lions and three fleur-de-lys x2 are the most appropriate for the period.
Last edited by St Leo; March 1, 2003 at 13:45.
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2003, 14:00
|
#43
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Thanx! I'm really grateful for you digging up these sources for me  -gonna keep the lions...
|
|
|
|
March 2, 2003, 02:18
|
#44
|
King
Local Time: 19:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Scenario League
Posts: 1,350
|
I love the scenario, but found it too short to win with any of the smaller powers.
My best small-power game was with the Scots. I had just destroyed the English and had captured much of Holland when the scenario ended.
So close to world domination... yet so far...
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2003, 09:43
|
#45
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Working on an update these days
Mostly in the historical detail department, city placements and some map changes. Spain now only controls one city in the netherlands from the outset, but has a much larger army there, making it more interesting for Spain to either crush the dutch rebellion or find a way of ferrying these troops to England. Or both.
I am in seven minds about how best to simulate the french civil war (war of the three henrys). I want this a little more accurate as can be from the outset, than in the first version.
I have a sketchy map of holy league and huguenot areas of control, and details on a number of cities, but still lack a general overview of how the civil war went on, in detail of sieges, organization and cities taken etc.
Any ideas, anyone? any good links or references?
I am also giving the events an overhaul, which means less random events and off-game history events, and more in-game events, rewarding/punishing civs for important victories/accomplishments.
Additionally, I use the events to simulate storms at sea, which makes it possible but also more dangerous to perform long voyages at sea, without seeking harbor.
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2003, 11:22
|
#46
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
Hey Morten!  I still have a list of things I noted while playing the latest version you sent me (with those storms and all) I don't think I ever sent them to you  Do you want them?
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
May 15, 2003, 13:10
|
#47
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Yes, please very much!
Do you still need that map btw for the joint ww2 scen, btw?
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2003, 14:48
|
#48
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
You've got a PM waiting for you
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
May 20, 2003, 18:44
|
#49
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Henrik, I've just sent you a reply... Posting your comments and my replies here as well (hope you don't mind), since I prefer to discuss the scenario here than the clumsy pm system
Henrik wrote on 20-05-2003 20:49:
Here is a short list I made while playing earlier:
I recomend placing a Courthouse in Flushing to prevent the Spanish from bribing it so easily early on...
---good idea, I have now removed the english from the continent again, since the treaty of Nonsuch (the one ceding Flushing and 3 other dutch cities to english) was signed only in 1585 ---now the conquest of Flushing forms a "protection pact" with England... in one way or another it will give England a bonus to take the city (or other dutch harbors) -not sure if its gonna be wonder based or something else
Ther storms seems to be to comon imho.
--noted... the reason why they're so common is to make it vital to seek ports for ships in between turns... -they happen in different parts of the map, and not in the med or smaller waters, such as the english channel. But they might be too frequent anyway. Of course the AI won't notice any of this
You should add a sound for cannons that are being "shot down" after having been left at sea.
--yes... still missing
Why is England and Holland affected by church opinion when signing deals with Spain? They're protestants!
--The spanish have the Catholic Unity wonder [oops I was wrong -its the Papal Reliquary (UN)], and even if the English and Dutch are protestants, they still had many catholic nobles of influence (especially the strongly divided dutch), and Spain was a power of extreme influence in Europe at the time (btw, the english even had an ambassador in Paris selling information to the spanish because he was out of money)... but you're right, I have to find a way to show this -or certain actions that will put this wonder out of action
Watch those storms! I had Lincoln flooded by one of them!
--woah! ;D gonna check the coordinates again, since I made some map changes after doing the storms
Lower the defence of hills or alternatively remove those that are beneath cities, some cities become virtually impossible to take becouse of hilly terrain.
--which ones in particular?
Last edited by hardjoy; May 20, 2003 at 18:52.
|
|
|
|
May 21, 2003, 17:41
|
#50
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Henrik, I've just tested the hills with fortified veteran musketeers behind city walls against siege cannon, bombards and field cannon.
The siege cannons were quite effective, where the bombards and field guns failed, getting only a few hits.
The bombards are okay for smaller cities and the field guns for smashing troops outside cities, but you really need the siege cannon to take cities.
Which units did you use in attack and which were the defender? -And what were their stats in your version?
|
|
|
|
May 22, 2003, 04:14
|
#51
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
I used several (well for england anyway, I used 3, which is about as many as they can build in one scenario) veteran seige cannons to attack the Musketeers based in Edinburgh.
All cannons where lost. Not a single hit was dealt to the defenders.
Musketeers: 4a,8d, 1h,6f
Seige Cannon: 24a,2d, 2h,8f
Hills= dx2, city walls=dx3
Musketeers on hills:
Defence 40 (or 64 even, depending on whether the city wall bonus is multiplied by the original defence value or the defence value as it is after having been augmented by the terrain).
Thankfully the fortify bonus isn't added for units behind city walls, otherwise the defence bonus would be even bigger.
Imho the stats are ok, just make sure that there are no hills beneath cities...
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
May 22, 2003, 08:09
|
#52
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Hmmm...
I need the hills to differentiate cities defences. Some cities should be naturally harder to take than others, especially Edinburgh, since the Scots are paralyzed if they lose their capital. So it should be tough. Have you thought about using a galleon for subduing the scots? -Another thing to consider : the faster one goes for the scots the easier it will be, since they cannot produce musketeers from the outset (they have 2 preplaced). They depend strongly on spanish tech trades.
In the latest version I've made the siege cannon dramatically better (att 36 with ign. walls) and slightly cheaper, and I also improved the defences of the defensive ground units (to prevent too easy bombardments). Musketeers now defend with 14, and 28 on hills, which is okay for the siege guns to take out, most of the time. I'll send you the latest version when its ready for final rounds of adjustments
In the latest version, I've found that limiting the prebuilt naval units for Spain makes spanish AI produce a much larger fleet of all kinds of ships, which is quite pleasant to see. They also build a huge army of arquebusiers. I've also added all kinds of neat surprises, if I can get them to work.
Ran into a lot of trouble with the no,no techs and events. Civ2 crashed on me time and time again and I had to patiently track down which error caused the crash. Seems it was the derived no,no tech (catholic plots) that the english was researching, but I am not sure. I am having second thoughts about the storms too. I really like the idea, but its messy to have english naval guns or ground units lying around in the sea after such a storm. And it seems the maprect coordinates are handled quite loosely by the events and sometimes cuts off land even if its not supposed to.
|
|
|
|
May 22, 2003, 08:46
|
#53
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
What I did eventually was to use a spy to sabotage the city walls
As for galleons, the brittish cannot afford a lot of them...
On the tech issue, it's my experience that civ 2 only crashes due to techs if the future tech isnt available to everyone all the time.
Make sure future tech is named to something fitting and make it a nil, nil tech and all should be fine.
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2003, 12:17
|
#54
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Thanx Henrik, but making future tech a nil tech didn't solve the problem. Civ2 still crashes on me. I guess something else is ****ed up in the tech tree, after messing around with no,no techs etc.
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2003, 12:42
|
#55
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
Managed to solve the problem by going back to an older version of rules.txt. Still haven't really understood why...
I got another problem, however. The events seem to refuse to build barbarian diplomats (wrecks). Is there certain things to consider for creating barbarian leaders with the events? -Do they have to be outside a city's radius, for example, or occupy specific slots?
The strange thing is they were created fine by the events as long as they were sea based units, but once I changed their domain and locations, they ceased to appear.
Last edited by hardjoy; May 26, 2003 at 13:36.
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2003, 15:45
|
#56
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
If you're creating them on sea tiles they have to be sea units. Is that it?
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2003, 16:07
|
#57
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 305
|
At first I thought that too, but I have made sure I updated all locations to land tiles, so that can't be it. Changing the role from diplomat/barb leader to something else doesn't seem to work either.
Here's the stats (using the diplo slot) :
Wreck, nil, 0, 0.,0, 0a,2d, 1h,1f, 8,0, 6, no, 000000000000000
Still working on that crash/stack error problem, btw... now civ2 suddenly crashed negotiating with the dutch. Going thru a trial and error process to find the root of the problem. It looks like a tech problem of some sorts.
Last edited by hardjoy; May 26, 2003 at 16:16.
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2003, 16:40
|
#58
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
It would make sence to have those wrecks as land units 
Being as wreck plundering (is that the term in english as well?) was mostly done by people living in coastal towns... Not by the regular navy.
I'd try domain 3 for the wrecks, should work on both land and sea.
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2003, 16:41
|
#59
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
Also make sure no units have 0 hp, that'll make the game crash (I see the wrecks do have 1 hp though).
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
May 26, 2003, 20:30
|
#60
|
King
Local Time: 14:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: of underdogs
Posts: 1,774
|
Where's the latest version of this scenario posted (sorry if I missed a link earlier in the thread)? Maybe some fresh eyes could help with the tech tree problem.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:51.
|
|