You know what we need - Page 17

vovan · February 27, 2003, 01:14

As you can see by the above pic, scant clothes isn't the only prerequisite for a good shot. Just look at those eyes, and... everything else.

But then again, scant clothes are always good

Yasmine Bleeth again

vovan · February 27, 2003, 01:16

Yap, it's Yasmine Bleeth again.

Jon Miller · February 27, 2003, 01:16

thanks for the wuatlity

I don't ahve any quality, and so had to go to Victoria's (And a couple of porn stars)

Jon Miller

vovan · February 27, 2003, 01:16

vovan · February 27, 2003, 01:19

Quote:

Originally posted by Jon Miller
thanks for the wuatlity

I don't ahve any quality, and so had to go to Victoria's (And a couple of porn stars)

Jon Miller

Hehe, that's why I am here.

To wrap it up for now, here is some Tiffany Thiessen for ya all:

DRoseDARs · February 27, 2003, 02:13

Since this thread is nearing the 500 post limit, might I suggest someone copy and paste the text below into the first post of the new Babe thread. Since there's been a little confusion of what is and is not legal for this thread, hopefully this'll clear things up in the new thread...

Also, suggested title:

Babe-A-Thon Part II
*********
Ground Rules:
1) Girl and Guy pictures are welcome
2) No nudes; Women covering their breasts with their arms are not legal
3) Men or Women covering their naughty bits with nothing more than their hands are not legal; same goes for coffee cups etc.
4) No Anime; real flesh-and-blood people only (there's already an anime thread going)
5) To be on the safe side, keep them of legal age: 21 and older please
6) Try to provide the names of your choosen picture(s) if you know them just 'cause others might be curious about it
7) Try to provide descent quality pictures, not grainy faded pictures: We're going for QUALITY not QUANTITY...

8) NO INSULTS or personal attacks against other posters, no matter how ugly you might think their choice of picture is...

Ladies and Gentlemen, start your posting...

Asher · February 27, 2003, 02:15

I'd suggest splitting up the guy and girl pics into different threads if Ming allows it.

I appreciate both, most people here don't like half the posts in this thread though.

And why is the legal age 21 and older? Is the porn/age of consent age 21 in any US state?

DRoseDARs · February 27, 2003, 02:35

However you want to make a new thread (or threads) 18 should be bare minimum age of those in the pictures. Age-of consent varies, so I'm not sure how best to answer. 18 is a good age to use for our purposes. I really don't want to see some 15 year old girl in a skimpy bathing suit, same goes for the guys. The might not be nude, but they are inappropriate.

Asher · February 27, 2003, 02:37

I can understand 18 fine, as far as I know "indecent" pictures of people under 18 are illegal just about everywhere, I was wondering if in some US states "indecent" pictures of people under 21 was illegal.

DRoseDARs · February 27, 2003, 02:41

Actually, 18 is the lowest age allowed; frankly I'd be much more comfortable if the limit was 21, but I don't make the laws...

Zopperoni · February 27, 2003, 07:33

Quote:

Originally posted by Asher
I'd suggest splitting up the guy and girl pics into different threads if Ming allows it.

I appreciate both, most people here don't like half the posts in this thread though.

I agree.

vovan · February 27, 2003, 10:40

Yep, third that. Splitting the guy and the girl pics into different threads would be better. Not that I particularly mind the half-naked dudes (Hell, I see one every day in the mirror

), but this "competition" thing about who posts more pics is getting a little out of hand, IMO. That kind of goes back to the quality issue - with 150 posts per day, you just can't expect good stuff.

DeathByTheSword · February 27, 2003, 17:20

HE

were did you all get those pictures of MY girlfriend....!

DeathByTheSword · February 27, 2003, 17:49

a little bit of support from the low countries

Ben Kenobi · February 27, 2003, 17:50

DRose:

One more thing. When you start the new babe-thread, post a link to the first one. This way all the threads can be linked, for your viewing pleasure.

If you want, we can link to the first babe thread, by Ted Striker, and call this Chick thread 2 or something along those lines.

That is how they do this over at CF.

Split the threads, please. This way you and Boris get the same amount of pleasure as the rest of us, without having to look through all those beautiful women.

DeathByTheSword · February 27, 2003, 17:50

and yet again!

Zopperoni · February 27, 2003, 17:54

Hm...going Dutch, eh?

Jon Miller · February 27, 2003, 18:44

Quote:

Originally posted by obiwan18
DRose:

One more thing. When you start the new babe-thread, post a link to the first one. This way all the threads can be linked, for your viewing pleasure.

If you want, we can link to the first babe thread, by Ted Striker, and call this Chick thread 2 or something along those lines.

That is how they do this over at CF.

Split the threads, please. This way you and Boris get the same amount of pleasure as the rest of us, without having to look through all those beautiful women.

there have been a more than 2 babe threads here

Jon Miller