Election: justices

Maniac · February 26, 2003, 15:23

Please choose five of the following candidates in the next three days.

Kassiopeia
Archaic
Drogue
Hercules
AdamTG02
Cedayon
Write-in
Abstain/Xenobanana!

Cedayon · February 26, 2003, 15:36

I imagine it goes without saying, but I give my word that I will, if made justice, perform my duties without any sort of bias (political, economic, etc.). I'm also active enough that I'll be here if there *is* actually a case, unlikely as that may be

Cedayon · February 26, 2003, 18:54

k, someone voted for Kass *and* Xenobanana...

Maniac · February 26, 2003, 19:21

Go Kass!

Method · February 26, 2003, 19:23

go everyone *but* kass!

nah, just kidding, i voted for you

Archaic · February 27, 2003, 06:46

I guarentee one thing if I'm elected, and I think that's the only thing that anyone should be looking for in this. Impartality.

Pandemoniak · February 27, 2003, 08:49

Quote:

Originally posted by Archaic
Impartality.

:jawsonthefloor:

And if we dont believe that one, Im sure you got another one ready to throw...

Cedayon · February 27, 2003, 08:55

Quote:

Originally posted by Pandemoniak
And if we dont believe that one, Im sure you got another one ready to throw...

To be fair I'm sure he *could* be impartial if he wanted to be.

Pandemoniak · February 27, 2003, 09:00

Quote:

Originally posted by Cedayon
To be fair I'm sure he *could* be impartial if he wanted to be.

Im positive he *could*. Even he might be impartial when I'll be gone at Deirdre's Garden of Gaia

Archaic · February 27, 2003, 17:38

BTW Pan, Kass told me he never made that quote you've got in your sig, so unless someone misappropriated his s/n for the Apolyton Chat (In which case, I'd like to know who), please remove that misquote.

Kassiopeia · February 27, 2003, 17:51

It's not a "misquote", it's just out of context or maybe poorly shaped so that it can be interpreted in different ways.

My original purpose was sarcasm, as I was at that point somewhat tired of the "Archaic vs. The Rest of the World" setting that was (and is, looking at the DOSE election) going on. Now I'm feeling indifferent about that, since you seem to twist my words around a bit. I have said that, only it can be intepreted differently in Pandemoniak's signature.

The only factual error with that quote is "TheEvangelionFreak", since I only use "The-Evangelion-Freak". That would mean that Pande didn't copy-paste the quote, rather he typed it down in memory, which might mean the quote isn't exactly what I typed.

But, the crux of the matter is:

1.) I have said something to that effect, albeit the nick is a bit dodgy.
2.) It's out of context, and as such under interpretation.
3.) My personal intention was sarcasm, so the quote shouldn't be taken as-is.

Oh, and 4.) I think this isn't exactly a beneficial thing to be our wasting time on.

I won't mind Pande keeping that in his sig, though he should add a ":rolleyes:" to the end of it... then again, even then it would be under interpretation. But in any case, I don't feel offended by Pan's use of that quote, but since it's a bit dodgy, I'd appreciate if he removed it. Of course, it shouldn't be that misinterpretable after this post.

Hercules · February 27, 2003, 22:51

I was just pleased last term not to have been called upon. And long may it continue. But if it doesn't and there is a case I will be impartial but strict with the constitution.

MrWhereItsAt · February 28, 2003, 00:52

I was a Justice last term, and was little able to do anything. Partly in order to make up for this and partly to satisfy my own sense of ... dissatisfaction, I must nominate and vote for myself here.

I am determined to do something now I am back and able to, and I will at least fight for the right. GRRRR!!!!!

Cedayon · February 28, 2003, 20:49

It would appear you're a bit late, MWIA, but the DPO seat is nice and, ah, warm for you

Archaic · March 1, 2003, 08:07

Oh, and BTW Pan......

Just how am I any less impartial than you, could you explain that please?

Pandemoniak · March 1, 2003, 08:48

Quote:

Originally posted by Kassiopeia
It's not a "misquote", it's just out of context or maybe poorly shaped so that it can be interpreted in different ways.

My original purpose was sarcasm, as I was at that point somewhat tired of the "Archaic vs. The Rest of the World" setting that was (and is, looking at the DOSE election) going on. Now I'm feeling indifferent about that, since you seem to twist my words around a bit. I have said that, only it can be intepreted differently in Pandemoniak's signature.

The only factual error with that quote is "TheEvangelionFreak", since I only use "The-Evangelion-Freak". That would mean that Pande didn't copy-paste the quote, rather he typed it down in memory, which might mean the quote isn't exactly what I typed.

But, the crux of the matter is:

1.) I have said something to that effect, albeit the nick is a bit dodgy.
2.) It's out of context, and as such under interpretation.
3.) My personal intention was sarcasm, so the quote shouldn't be taken as-is.

Oh, and 4.) I think this isn't exactly a beneficial thing to be our wasting time on.

I won't mind Pande keeping that in his sig, though he should add a ":rolleyes:" to the end of it... then again, even then it would be under interpretation. But in any case, I don't feel offended by Pan's use of that quote, but since it's a bit dodgy, I'd appreciate if he removed it. Of course, it shouldn't be that misinterpretable after this post.

Only the name has been typed down, while the quote has been copied/pasted. But Ill suppress it if it bothers you. -- Though I would prefer to add the couples of line that followed :
Pande : Hey, here's a nice quote for my sig !
TEF : Duh.
Pande : lol

Cedayon · March 1, 2003, 14:13

Quote:

Originally posted by Archaic
Oh, and BTW Pan......

Just how am I any less impartial than you, could you explain that please?

I'm interested in the answer to that, too, but I should note that he isn't the one running for justice

DeathByTheSword · March 1, 2003, 15:37

kassi as a judge....

/me glad he doesnt have a goverment job this term

Archaic · March 1, 2003, 23:40

Quote:

Originally posted by Cedayon
I'm interested in the answer to that, too, but I should note that he isn't the one running for justice

Not this time no, but he was a justice before, and somehow thought that gave him immunity to anything.

Cedayon · March 2, 2003, 03:22

Quote:

Originally posted by Archaic
Not this time no, but he was a justice before, and somehow thought that gave him immunity to anything.

You mean it doesn't?

*snaps fingers*

Pandemoniak · March 2, 2003, 14:49

Cedayon, how come you have no signature nor avatar ?

Cedayon · March 2, 2003, 15:01

I don't bother with those anymore. At this point it'd just be scripture passages and crosses anyhow, no sense in doing that here.