You know what we need - male babe thread - Page 2

Oerdin · February 28, 2003, 02:13

I may be induced to tell you which thread it was but you will first have to ditch the weasel flag and reinstate the glorious maple leaf.

Boris Godunov · February 28, 2003, 09:04

Quote:

Originally posted by Frogger

Oerdin: a) Is the line in your sig from my thread about the gigantic snow penis?

b) What happened to the thread? I can't find it...

It was deleted. I posted a thread in the Community forum complaining about it being deleted, and that, too, was deleted. No explanation was given whatsoever.

SlowwHand · February 28, 2003, 10:40

This reminds me of somebody here, but I can't remember exactly who.

Boris Godunov · February 28, 2003, 11:05

That isn't a male. So why's it here?

Ming · February 28, 2003, 11:08

New rule people...

Since there are now seperate threads... Post only Male pictures in the Male Babe thread... and Female Babes in the Female Babe thread.

And do not spam the threads with inappropriate pictures.

SlowwHand · February 28, 2003, 11:12

That is a male, Boris.

SpencerH · February 28, 2003, 11:13

Ah! Ming has become a judge of which pictures of males are 'babes' and which are 'spam'.

Boris Godunov · February 28, 2003, 11:13

Malarky!

Ming · February 28, 2003, 11:15

Quote:

Originally posted by SpencerH
Ah! Ming has become a judge of which pictures of males are 'babes' and which are 'spam'.

That is correct... as in all things in the OTF... the opinions of the mods are what counts. Deal with it

Boris Godunov · February 28, 2003, 11:20

Quote:

Originally posted by SpencerH
Ah! Ming has become a judge of which pictures of males are 'babes' and which are 'spam'.

See, that's why I think they shouldn't be separated. It's for Ming's sake. That way, whilst having to make sure the male pics are appropriate, he could at least be treated to hot chicks as well.

SpencerH · February 28, 2003, 11:23

Was Ming being coy, or did he miss the joke?

Ming · February 28, 2003, 11:23

They should be seperated... I was just waiting for it to happen. As far as tastes go, different strokes for different folks... However, it doesn't take much judgement to realize that loinburger's picture would fall in the spamming/disruption category

Ming · February 28, 2003, 11:25

Quote:

Originally posted by SpencerH
Was Ming being coy, or did he miss the joke?

No... just making my point clear so that EVERYBODY understands.

SpencerH · February 28, 2003, 11:26

Disruption? Not at all! If there are people who take pictures of man in diapers surely there must be someone who appreciates it. Maybe loinburger himself.

SlowwHand · February 28, 2003, 11:31

True, as evidenced at ACS, different strokes for different folks.
SOMEONE took the picture, after all.

Ming · February 28, 2003, 11:34

If a picture like that is posted in the future, somebody might find themselves restricted.

While it's a matter of opinion, the mods opinions are what matters... so be warned

SlowwHand · February 28, 2003, 12:00

ok, fine. (mutter,mutter)

Here, Boris. Don't say I never gave you anything.

[img][/img]

Pic removed to cut out whining .

Datajack Franit · February 28, 2003, 13:20

Hmm someone should really think of a hot babes vintage quasi-porn-but not enough to be banned forever- thread

Boris Godunov · February 28, 2003, 13:22

So, are naked buttocks ok then? If so, my ammunition just increased tenfold!

Ming · February 28, 2003, 13:25

It better be a side view... there is a "too much crack" rule for both sexes

Post at your own risk. I don't like the "is this over the line" game, and will punish without warning.

DRoseDARs · February 28, 2003, 17:52

I really don't think we should see ANY unclothed buttocks, but if you're granting permission to the point of side profile, then I imagine I can dig up a few [hundred] more pictures here and there in my harddrive...