Thread Tools
Old March 3, 2003, 19:31   #1
bigfree1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Something New in Combat for MP?
Maybe I'm wrong, but I seem to rember that if I attacked a stack of units, and that stack contained more than one artillary, that ONLY one of the artillary would bombard aginst the attacking unit. If another unit were to attack the same stack on the same turn, the next artillary would take it's turn and bombard that next attacking unit. This would happen up to the number of artillary units in the stack, until the number of attacking units exceeded the number of bombarding units. I could almost swear this is what I've experienced in the past.


What I see now in MP play (post patch) is that 'all' bombarding units will bombard the attacking unit when they attack the stack. The bombarding units will bombard up to the point that either the attacking units health is reduced to one or there are no more bombarding units left with turns.
 
Old March 3, 2003, 22:44   #2
Fried-Psitalon
Civilization IV: MultiplayerInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamPtWDG Gathering StormGalCiv Apolyton EmpireCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMApolyton UniversityC4DG Sarantium
Official Civilization IV Strategy Guide Co-Author
 
Fried-Psitalon's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not just another pretty face.
Posts: 1,516
I believe this is unchanged and was that way in 1.14 and earlier; as a matter of fact I'll bet on that fact. I'm one such person who uses large-scale pulting on defense and they've always worked that way for me.
__________________
Friedrich Psitalon
Admin, Civ4Players Ladder
Consultant, Firaxis Games
Fried-Psitalon is offline  
Old March 4, 2003, 16:00   #3
Datajack Franit
NationStates
King
 
Datajack Franit's Avatar
 
Local Time: 21:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Italia
Posts: 2,036
It is unchanged
__________________
I will never understand why some people on Apolyton find you so clever. You're predictable, mundane, and a google-whore and the most observant of us all know this. Your battles of "wits" rely on obscurity and whenever you fail to find something sufficiently obscure, like this, you just act like a 5 year old. Congratulations, molly.

Asher on molly bloom
Datajack Franit is offline  
Old March 5, 2003, 15:11   #4
Rommel2D
staff
Civilization III PBEMIron Civers
Moderator
 
Rommel2D's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dfb climate North America
Posts: 4,009
This must be a vanilla to PtW change, because I'm still waiting on PtW to ship and have never seen this in V1.29f.

Anyone know what the f signifies in the version #? Just the final patch for the program?
Rommel2D is offline  
Old March 5, 2003, 16:32   #5
Wittlich
lifer
Call to Power II MultiplayerCivilization III MultiplayerTrade Wars / BlackNova TradersCivilization III PBEMPtWDG Vox ControliCivilization III Democracy GameCiv4 SP Democracy GameC3CDG EuphoricaIron CiversCivilization IV: MultiplayerCivilization IV PBEMC4WDG United Dungeon DwellersDiploGamesC4BtSDG TemplarsPolyCast Team
Deity
 
Wittlich's Avatar
 
Local Time: 13:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Baron of Sealand residing in SF, CA
Posts: 12,344
Yes. f=final.
__________________
____________________________
"One day if I do go to heaven, I'm going to do what every San Franciscan does who goes to heaven - I'll look around and say, 'It ain't bad, but it ain't San Francisco.'" - Herb Caen, 1996
"If God, as they say, is homophobic, I wouldn't worship that God." - Archbishop Desmond Tutu
____________________________
Wittlich is offline  
Old March 6, 2003, 14:27   #6
Rommel2D
staff
Civilization III PBEMIron Civers
Moderator
 
Rommel2D's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dfb climate North America
Posts: 4,009
Quote:
Yes. f=final.

Are you certain of that? Or does it just mean the most current? The new patch for PtW is being referred to as 1.21f. Are they going to finalize the program without fixing the mobilization bug? I knew Firaxis was slipping, but I don't believe they'd leave a program already sold to cusotmers in beta status. >:[

If that's the case, at least I think I can still cancel my order.
Rommel2D is offline  
Old March 6, 2003, 14:36   #7
Fried-Psitalon
Civilization IV: MultiplayerInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamPtWDG Gathering StormGalCiv Apolyton EmpireCivilization III MultiplayerCivilization III PBEMApolyton UniversityC4DG Sarantium
Official Civilization IV Strategy Guide Co-Author
 
Fried-Psitalon's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Not just another pretty face.
Posts: 1,516
I think the "F" refers to the version of the patch? Wasn't it 1.14f, too?

I sure hope they plan on doing a bit more work with MP.... for one thing, auto-bombard doesn't work anymore.... you have to tell things to bombard again every turn.

It'd also be really spiffy if there was a command to say "Everything that bombards in this square, bombard here now."
__________________
Friedrich Psitalon
Admin, Civ4Players Ladder
Consultant, Firaxis Games
Fried-Psitalon is offline  
Old March 6, 2003, 15:55   #8
Rommel2D
staff
Civilization III PBEMIron Civers
Moderator
 
Rommel2D's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dfb climate North America
Posts: 4,009
Yeah, I see the f in older posts too. This must mean it's the "watershed" patch- 1.14f, 1.15, ...1.19, 1.20, 1.21f?
Rommel2D is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:51.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team