March 12, 2003, 09:47
|
#61
|
Guest
|
Re: Re: Rumsfeld: We don't need the UK
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Elden
Such as forcing Australia to make up the numbers...
|
That would be impossible - Not enough population.
However, would you consider having some of our tactical nukes?
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:18
|
#62
|
King
Local Time: 21:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,195
|
I was watching this in the news yesterday
Sky (Right wingish)
ITN (Right wingish)
BBC (More or less centre)
and all 3 had the same lead, that Rummy had goofed and had really offended the UK and embaressed and undermined Blair.
Sky's Adam Boulton described a "firestorm of protest from Number 10" directed at Rummy after his remarks.
__________________
(+1)
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:30
|
#63
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
|
I watched the breifing live. I didn't see anything wrong with what he meant, just with the way he said it.
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:38
|
#64
|
OTF Moderator
Local Time: 22:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Ming on rakastajani
Posts: 7,511
|
Of course. He meant well it was just that what he said totally undermined what Blair is trying to achieve with the diplomatic stuff for the second ammendment and also undermined the way Blair is telling us that he's totally committed to disarming Iraq whatever it takes.
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:47
|
#65
|
Deity
Local Time: 17:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
|
Well, it's better having Rummy mean well but goof, than having Rummy not mean well and not goof.
Libya and Cuba anyone?
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:48
|
#66
|
Settler
Local Time: 22:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 0
|
Where's the difference?
__________________
“Now we declare… that the law-making power or the first and real effective source of law is the people or the body of citizens or the prevailing part of the people according to its election or its will expressed in general convention by vote, commanding or deciding that something be done or omitted in regard to human civil acts under penalty or temporal punishment….” (Marsilius of Padua, „Defensor Pacis“, AD 1324)
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:52
|
#67
|
Deity
Local Time: 17:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
|
One isn't funny. The other one is.
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:54
|
#68
|
Settler
Local Time: 22:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 0
|
Ah, entertainment value...
__________________
“Now we declare… that the law-making power or the first and real effective source of law is the people or the body of citizens or the prevailing part of the people according to its election or its will expressed in general convention by vote, commanding or deciding that something be done or omitted in regard to human civil acts under penalty or temporal punishment….” (Marsilius of Padua, „Defensor Pacis“, AD 1324)
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:56
|
#69
|
Deity
Local Time: 17:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
|
What would politics be like without good political theater?
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 10:57
|
#70
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
|
While the comment may not be the best for Blair, it was truthful. Should Rumsfeld have lied and said that the US needs Britain in order to squash Iraq? It doesnt. I like the fact that Rumsfeld tells it as he sees it. I've had enough of diplomatic double-speak and 'spinning'. If the anti-war pressure prohibits Britain from taking part, then the US will do it alone. Did anyone doubt that?
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 11:00
|
#71
|
Settler
Local Time: 22:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 0
|
Oh, I'm perfectly happy with Rumsie's comment....
__________________
“Now we declare… that the law-making power or the first and real effective source of law is the people or the body of citizens or the prevailing part of the people according to its election or its will expressed in general convention by vote, commanding or deciding that something be done or omitted in regard to human civil acts under penalty or temporal punishment….” (Marsilius of Padua, „Defensor Pacis“, AD 1324)
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 11:14
|
#72
|
Moderator
Local Time: 21:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of Candle'Bre
Posts: 8,664
|
Thank God for Britain, Spain, and other members of the international community who are committed to the cause, despite the occassional gaffe from our less-than-perfect leaders.
I never imagined that we'd have to drag the UN kicking and screaming like a bunch of little girls to the enforcement of it's own d@mned resolution, but so be it.
-=Vel=-
__________________
The list of published books grows . If you're curious to see what sort of stories I weave out , head to Amazon.com and do an author search for "Christopher Hartpence ." Help support Candle'Bre , a game created by gamers FOR gamers. All proceeds from my published works go directly to the project .
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 11:20
|
#73
|
Settler
Local Time: 22:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 0
|
"to the enforcement of it's own d@mned resolution"
You really believe that is the issue?
__________________
“Now we declare… that the law-making power or the first and real effective source of law is the people or the body of citizens or the prevailing part of the people according to its election or its will expressed in general convention by vote, commanding or deciding that something be done or omitted in regard to human civil acts under penalty or temporal punishment….” (Marsilius of Padua, „Defensor Pacis“, AD 1324)
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 11:27
|
#74
|
Moderator
Local Time: 21:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of Candle'Bre
Posts: 8,664
|
That's part of the issue, yes. It absolutely is, whether you care to acknowledge it or not.
"serious consequences" means just exactly that. Serious. Consequential. Force was not specifically called for, but NO ONE discounted the use of it....after all, with sanctions and no fly zones in place already, there weren't any other "serious" or "consequential"
cards to play, now were there?
We have been d*cking around with Saddam for almost twice as long a time now, as US soldiers spent fighting WWI, WWII, and Korea COMBINED (counting from Saddam's FIRST UN violation).
Enough is enough.
If the UN lacks the balls to enforce its own resolution then perhaps (just perhaps, mind you), it should get out of the business of writing them. In any case, they have certainly proved their own uselessness, and we will enforce the resolution on its behalf, whether it likes it or not.
-=Vel=-
__________________
The list of published books grows . If you're curious to see what sort of stories I weave out , head to Amazon.com and do an author search for "Christopher Hartpence ." Help support Candle'Bre , a game created by gamers FOR gamers. All proceeds from my published works go directly to the project .
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 11:32
|
#75
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
|
From the comments I've seen watching the security council bullshit, they're aware of how pathetic and impotent they look.
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 11:37
|
#76
|
Deity
Local Time: 17:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Not your daddy's Benjamins
Posts: 10,737
|
Are you watching it on CSPAN or something? Or do you mean just generally in the last few open meetings?
__________________
I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 11:54
|
#77
|
Deity
Local Time: 17:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 138% of your RDA of Irony
Posts: 18,577
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by SpencerH
From the comments I've seen watching the security council bullshit, they're aware of how pathetic and impotent they look.
|
Whereas your dear leaders seem blissfully ignorant of how they look.
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 12:19
|
#78
|
Emperor
Local Time: 07:28
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Caerdydd, Cymru
Posts: 5,303
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Velociryx
That's part of the issue, yes. It absolutely is, whether you care to acknowledge it or not.
"serious consequences" means just exactly that. Serious. Consequential. Force was not specifically called for, but NO ONE discounted the use of it....after all, with sanctions and no fly zones in place already, there weren't any other "serious" or "consequential"
cards to play, now were there?
|
Why not say 'War' then?
To me 'serious consequences' means things like tougher sanctions, regularly bombing the crap out of Iraqi installations (which is already happening every other day on average!) etc. It is NOT war...
Quote:
|
We have been d*cking around with Saddam for almost twice as long a time now, as US soldiers spent fighting WWI, WWII, and Korea COMBINED (counting from Saddam's FIRST UN violation).
|
Yes, but still less time than France and the UK fought in those wars - where were you guys when we were fighting Hitler?
Not forgetting those 4 years when the US pulled out the weapons inspectors...
Which is why we don't want a war of first resort! Did you know that Iraq's two biggest opposition parties are opposed to a war...?
Quote:
|
If the UN lacks the balls to enforce its own resolution then perhaps (just perhaps, mind you), it should get out of the business of writing them. In any case, they have certainly proved their own uselessness, and we will enforce the resolution on its behalf, whether it likes it or not.
|
Bollocks! 'Serious Consequencies' does not a war make!
If you get the second resolution, by all means consider it a green light in getting thousands of civilians killed...
__________________
"People would rather die than think, and most people do." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 12:29
|
#79
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by MOBIUS
Which is why we don't want a war of first resort! Did you know that Iraq's two biggest opposition parties are opposed to a war...?
|
Erm....
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 12:42
|
#80
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by DanS
Are you watching it on CSPAN or something? Or do you mean just generally in the last few open meetings?
|
Yeah I caught the speeches to the security council by the australian and canadian ambassadors to the UN on cspan.
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 12:43
|
#81
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Frogger
Whereas your dear leaders seem blissfully ignorant of how they look.
|
My leaders?
0.00000001
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 12:44
|
#82
|
Emperor
Local Time: 07:28
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Caerdydd, Cymru
Posts: 5,303
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Big Crunch
Erm....
|
Erm what?
Earth Radiation Mission?
Empirical Risk Minimisation?
Engineering for Reduced Maintenance?
Empowerment Recovery Model?
Exchange Rate Mechanism?
Sorry, you need to be more specific...
I'm all for a war of last resort, but as far as I am concerned we haven't reached there yet...
__________________
"People would rather die than think, and most people do." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 13:17
|
#83
|
Moderator
Local Time: 21:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: of Candle'Bre
Posts: 8,664
|
Why not say war? Because the UNSC hasn't got the nads to use such harsh language. The USA has been paying to keep Saddam "contained" and as long as we're the ones doing the flying and footing the bill, it should be up to us when we say enough is enough. Since it's our boys on the front line, and our money paying to keep him in check, if we feel it's time to pull the plug and do something stronger, then that is something we do not need anybody's permission on. I have seen NO evidence of any other nation, or collection of nations stepping up to help. Nada.
Tougher sanctions? France and Germany have been ignoring them anyway! What....do you think Saddam and his cronies MADE THEIR OWN drone? Made their own Smallpox virus? Nahhh, they bought them from our "allies" who short circuited the whole idea behind sanctions, and only now, when we're pushing for something decisive, do they fall back to the old sanctions line, bemoaning the fact that we just haven't given it enough time.
Uh huh.
I'm quite sure that France and Germany would much rather see Uncle Sam foot the bill for Saddam's containment till he grows old and dies....that way, nothing is required of either country.
But that's not what we're going to do, nor is it up for discussion, any moreso than the USA has any say over France's budgetary process.
At the core of it, is this. Saddam is a little terror of our own creation. We regard him as a threat, and plan to remove that threat. Our allies, AS allies, should not raise such a stink over what is essentially the US taking out its own garbage.
That France and Germany ARE, however....that they are actively drumming up support against it, speaks directly to something important.
How much of an ally are they, really?
-=Vel=-
__________________
The list of published books grows . If you're curious to see what sort of stories I weave out , head to Amazon.com and do an author search for "Christopher Hartpence ." Help support Candle'Bre , a game created by gamers FOR gamers. All proceeds from my published works go directly to the project .
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 13:18
|
#84
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Back in BAMA full time.
Posts: 4,502
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by MOBIUS
Why not say 'War' then?
|
The UN cant declare war, its not a country.
Quote:
|
To me 'serious consequences' means things like tougher sanctions, regularly bombing the crap out of Iraqi installations (which is already happening every other day on average!) etc. It is NOT war...
|
Tougher sanctions, with French companies continuing to sell replacement parts for Iraqi aircraft through other ME countries. http://washingtontimes.com/national/20030307-545570.htm
We are not 'regularly bombing the crap out of Iraqi installations (which is already happening every other day on average!)'. We attack SAM sites that illegally lock onto our patrolling aircraft
How long did France fight the nazis?
Quote:
|
Not forgetting those 4 years when the US pulled out the weapons inspectors...
|
The US inspectors were told to leave Iraq. UNSCOM left Iraq after Iraq refused to allow them to do their job.
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 13:28
|
#85
|
Deity
Local Time: 22:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Seouenaca, Cantium
Posts: 12,426
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by MOBIUS
Erm what?
|
Iraq has opposition parties?
__________________
"Everybody knows you never go full retard. You went full retard man. Never go full retard"
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 15:24
|
#86
|
Emperor
Local Time: 07:28
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Caerdydd, Cymru
Posts: 5,303
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Big Crunch
Iraq has opposition parties?
|
Well, naturally they're not in Iraq...
Of course the US is brokering deals with other more, shall we say 'malleable' exiles - there was a secret meeting that Colin Powell attended in Vienna the other week...
*cough* Puppet Government in the making? *cough*
Love your avatar BTW - Boom Boom!
__________________
"People would rather die than think, and most people do." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 15:38
|
#87
|
Emperor
Local Time: 07:28
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Caerdydd, Cymru
Posts: 5,303
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by SpencerH
The UN cant declare war, its not a country.
|
It can pass resolutions allowing other countries to do so - that is what the US is claiming 1441 is after all...
Well I don't believe in most of the sanctions anyway and while that report is troubling, the US and UK were doing far worse before 1991 - it's just that at the time Saddam was 'our son of a b*tch', so we didn't care about his WoMD killing innocent civilians then...
Quote:
|
We are not 'regularly bombing the crap out of Iraqi installations (which is already happening every other day on average!)'. We attack SAM sites that illegally lock onto our patrolling aircraft
|
Those are installations aren't they? The other week they struck Iraqi surface to surface missiles being moved to the front - which is a blatant violation of the no-fly resolutions. The US and UK have been waging an undeclared war against Iraq for months now...
Quote:
|
How long did France fight the nazis?
|
Well, there were the French Resistance fighters and the Free French led by De Gaulle, so I think you're being a tad unfair...
Quote:
|
The US inspectors were told to leave Iraq. UNSCOM left Iraq after Iraq refused to allow them to do their job.
|
Oh see there I was thinking that the US pulled them out unilaterally. This should have been addressed in 1998.
Bush reminds me of Mugabe and the white farmers - he's had 23 years to sort out the land rights in Zimbabwe with offers of generous grants from the UK to help, instead he's sat on his arse until one day he suddenly decides they're all evil scum that need to be illegally evicted immediately, destroying his economy at the same time... It's a f*cked up way of dealing with things and the world is telling Bush to go to hell because of it!
Why is Bush still appeasing North Korea?
__________________
"People would rather die than think, and most people do." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 15:40
|
#88
|
Deity
Local Time: 16:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Underwater no one can hear sharks scream
Posts: 11,096
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by MOBIUS
the US and UK were doing far worse before 1991
|
The US never sold Iraq any weapons of import.
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 15:47
|
#89
|
Emperor
Local Time: 07:28
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Caerdydd, Cymru
Posts: 5,303
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by DinoDoc
The US never sold Iraq any weapons of import.
|
Iraq got more than enough support from the US and you know it!
But hey, if you want real two-faced bastardry, what about the Iran-Contra affair huh?
Secretly selling weapons to one of your top enemies for money to fund a sordid and evil little war against a democratically elected goverment!
USA! USA! USA!
__________________
"People would rather die than think, and most people do." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
March 12, 2003, 15:59
|
#90
|
Emperor
Local Time: 15:28
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: of the Big Apple
Posts: 4,109
|
Quote:
|
How long did France fight the nazis?
|
Hmm.. if I remember correctly, longer than the Poles, Serbs, Belgians, Dutch, Danes, Greeks, Norwegians, and certainly longer than those like the Slovaks, Croats, Hungarians, Romanians, Bulgarians, and Italians who backed the Nazi's (of course that is no black mark as long as they support the war), or the Spaniards who took their aid but never got involved (also not a black mark on them, of course). Oh, and lets not forget the strong resistance the US put up against Nazi Germany before Dec 9, 1941: we really wanted to go towar before we actually went to war when they declared it on us... we really, really did.
That is, of course, if one ignores the actions of resistance figthers from any of the conqured nations, and the expatirates who fought bravely alongside Allied forces in Europe.
Yes, of course we must alway ridicuale the Vichy French government for its actions: it is utterly hypocritcal though to ignore the complicty of most of our European backers had with the Nazis as well.
__________________
If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake :(
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:28.
|
|