 |
View Poll Results: Where to attack now?
|
|
|
Wien
|
   
|
4 |
44.44% |
|
Pilsen
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Another civilization (Please specify which)
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Lets slow down the attacks
|
  
|
1 |
11.11% |
|
Abstain
|
  
|
4 |
44.44% |
|
March 17, 2003, 10:26
|
#1
|
|
King
Local Time: 18:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: of Natal, Brazil
Posts: 2,555
|
OFFICIAL: Target for the 16th Chat!
By mention the 16th, i dont mean we will attack in this chat. I just need to know where to attack. So that in this chat we can prepare something like a attack force to launch an attack in the chats to come.
We only have 4 options as far as i see:
1) Austrian city of Wien
2) Austrian city of Pilsen
3) Another civilization (Please specify which one)
4) Dont attack!
It is pretty clear. Where should we place a target on?
__________________
"Kill a man and you are a murder.
Kill thousands and you are a conquer.
Kill all and you are a God!"
-Jean Rostand
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2003, 13:47
|
#2
|
|
Super Moderator
Local Time: 23:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 6,206
|
Wien is the most valuable target so go to Wien.
-Martin
__________________
Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2003, 14:39
|
#3
|
|
King
Local Time: 22:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: aachen, germany
Posts: 1,100
|
generally i say wien, but i haven't looked at the current savegame yet carefully, only if we have enough forces to secure all our cities
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2003, 14:44
|
#4
|
|
Super Moderator
Local Time: 23:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 6,206
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Zaphod Beeblebrox
generally i say wien, but i haven't looked at the current savegame yet carefully, only if we have enough forces to secure all our cities
|
Therefore Pedrunn mentioned in his post that if we are going to attack Wien, we won't do it this turn necessarily.
-Martin
__________________
Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2003, 15:32
|
#5
|
|
King
Local Time: 22:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: aachen, germany
Posts: 1,100
|
and thats, why i voted wien instead of abstain 
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2003, 16:11
|
#6
|
|
Deity
Local Time: 23:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: De Hel van Enschede
Posts: 11,702
|
Abstain. We should now attack the size-1 cities in the north, Troppau and the other one (forgot the name). As I've noted before, that will greatly reduce their power base and resource collection, at little to no cost for us. Then prepare for a strike on Wien. But it will be a hard battle, so take plenty of time for that (we'll need at least 24-30 units and a suicide attack a few turns in advance).
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2003, 16:46
|
#7
|
|
King
Local Time: 23:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toulouse (South-western France)
Posts: 2,051
|
I agree with Locutus. I have already expressed my opinion in a previous Turn Chat. While we are building the armies that will deliver the final blow we should attack as soon as possible the little Austrian cities bordering our empire before staging a full scale attack on Wien. We are engaged in a war of attrition and we must reduce the Austrian military potential by destroying or occupying its peripheral centers of production before attacking Wien. 
Moreover, before Wien, Pilsen should be our first target.
I hereby abstain.
__________________
"Democracy is the worst form of government there is, except for all the others that have been tried." Sir Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 18, 2003, 09:13
|
#8
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 21:57
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,272
|
I vote abstain for the reasons Locutus and Tamerlin put forward, seems like good sense IMHO?
__________________
'The very basis of the liberal idea – the belief of individual freedom is what causes the chaos' - William Kristol, son of the founder of neo-conservitivism, talking about neo-con ideology and its agenda for you. info here. prove me wrong.
Bush's Republican=Neo-con for all intent and purpose. be afraid.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:57.
|
|
