 |
View Poll Results: Should we form a seperate region for sea bases?
|
|
|
Yes, and have it include all sea bases (including ones in the Freshwater Sea)
|
   
|
1 |
20.00% |
|
Yes, but leave the Freshwater Sea bases with their current regions
|
  
|
4 |
80.00% |
|
No
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Write-in
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Xenobanana 
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
March 23, 2003, 01:41
|
#1
|
|
King
Local Time: 17:21
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
Official: Should we form a seperate region for sea bases?
I think the question is fairly straightforward. The possible answers are as follows:
-Yes, and have it include all sea bases (including ones in the Freshwater Sea)
-Yes, but leave the Freshwater Sea bases with their current regions
-No
-Write-in
-Xenobanana
In the event that a region is also formed from liberated Hive bases, the matter of which region gets UN Peace Anchorage's will be discussed seperately.
For reference, the sea bases in question are as follows:
UNMI (in the FWS)
Espirito del Aqua (in the FWS)
Circular Quay (West of TA and Antioch)
UN Aquaxenobanana (SE-ish of Capricorn)
UN Slippery Ground (E of UNAXB)
UN Peace Anchorage (east, beyond the Mouth of Hercules, between Hive and Morganite territory)
I could post a pic, but I'm rather preoccupied (translates to lazy, essentially) right now. If necessary, I'll post a pic tomorrow.
edit- the number of the days of this poll shall be 3... not 2, for that is one number too short, nor 4 for that is one too long... 5 is right out!
|
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 01:54
|
#2
|
|
King
Local Time: 17:21
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
Oh, and we'd also need to sort out a name for this region, but that can be handled later. Name suggestions, folks?
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 02:31
|
#3
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
Yes, but leave the FWS bases in their current regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 03:00
|
#4
|
|
King
Local Time: 17:21
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
Oh, btw, there's a chance that CQ might become a land base fairly soon, if TKG's evil plans are allowed to proceed.
Frankly I think CQ (just the base tile for now) should be raised immediately for security purposes, as right now it's vulnerable to attack from the western sea, where we have less defenses than I'd like. Land bases are generally easier to get more out of, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 03:16
|
#5
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
The place is under attack right now, from a Believer Missile Cruiser.
Last edited by GeneralTacticus; March 23, 2003 at 03:30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 03:22
|
#6
|
|
King
Local Time: 17:21
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
I know, that's one of the reasons I want it raised... the square with the cruiser could be raised too, *that* would give Miriam a surprise 
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 03:26
|
#7
|
|
Emperor
Local Time: 09:21
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
|
 Yes, it would indeed 
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:21.
|
|
