|
View Poll Results: Should I play the Great War PBEM?
|
|
Yes, it was pretty much done!
|
|
3 |
75.00% |
No, it was a work in progress!
|
|
0 |
0% |
Go for the banana scen instead!
|
|
1 |
25.00% |
|
March 23, 2003, 11:31
|
#1
|
Prince
Local Time: 17:23
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 368
|
Scott F's Great War
First a question of etiquette:
Would it be impolite for me to open a PBEM of Scott F's Great War scenario, which was never "finalized" following certain controversies?
If I have a consensus of "NO" then I will open one, and post the necessary game files
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 11:33
|
#2
|
Prince
Local Time: 17:23
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 368
|
Oops, I probably should have given everyone some time for the poll. Just post your opinions below then
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 12:00
|
#3
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:23
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mola mazo!
Posts: 13,118
|
I believe Scott had a lot more to do in terms of events files and such.
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 12:09
|
#4
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:23
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fighting a fierce battle for the Rodina!
Posts: 887
|
Go For the banana scen instead!!
__________________
"This Nation has earned the right to Live." - Carl Gustav von Mannerheim
Comrade Patiskov Figiskovsky serving as Commander of the 2nd Ukranian Front and Member of the Stavka in RF DG!
Current Medals: Valiant Labour Medal and Order of Glory and IRC medal
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 14:33
|
#5
|
Prince
Local Time: 17:23
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 368
|
The scenario (from my sp exp, which admittedly is not what the scenario was designed for) is playable, and more importantly it is enjoyable.
However, what you said about the events is true, they are slightly unpolished.
If anyone wants to see the files, I'll post them
|
|
|
|
March 23, 2003, 20:46
|
#6
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:23
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,057
|
AFAIK, while Scott planned to do a bit more work on the scenario, he considered it nearly complete (though the last sets of events files needed some more work from memory). As such, I sugest that you try and contact Scott via email, and if he doesn't reply within, say 1 or 2 weeks, start the game.
__________________
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
|
|
|
|
March 24, 2003, 01:38
|
#7
|
King
Local Time: 14:23
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Dixon, CA USA
Posts: 1,156
|
There were definite play balance issues though. While the Entente were able to have some early successes, there were arbitrary restrictions on them, and some of the events just gave a huge advantage to the Central Powers. I don't think there was any hope for any of the Entente aside from Britain in our game by 1915
|
|
|
|
March 24, 2003, 06:59
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:23
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,057
|
Yeah, that's true.
IMO, a lot of the play balance issues could have been fixed by taking railroads out of the game, and greatly reducing the number of Howitzers which the Germans start with.
It was a pretty good scenario though, espcially due to it's realistic simulation of WW1 combat [ie, you could only take cities early in the game by kamikazing dozens of units into them]
__________________
'Arguing with anonymous strangers on the internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be - or to be indistinguishable from - self-righteous sixteen year olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.'
- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:23.
|
|