March 31, 2003, 17:26
|
#1
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Castellón, Spain
Posts: 3,571
|
defending Ukraine
well as the first ukrainian front I have an important challenge to face
what i´m going to do is left undefended lvov and kirograv
Gomel should build AA bateries and Kharkov keep building NKVD troopers
, usually my main goal is to have a defensive line in Vitebsk and smolensk north
and serafimovick, voronezh and rostov east
at this time my only strategy will be to rushbuild an AA batery and try to move any unit possible
so, do i try to defend kiev at all cost?
i´ll need to rush build an aa batery and a T 34/76 at gomel
do i massive pillage the roads??
sugestions are very welcome since the 1st ukrainian front has never been in my mind before
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2003, 18:32
|
#2
|
Prince
Local Time: 22:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Kremlin
Posts: 379
|
Is there much point in holding Kiev at all costs? Because we are never going hold it, the best we could hope for is to slow the Axis advance down. I would rather consentrate my defences further back.
The main problem with pillaging the roads is that there is going to be hell to to pay when we advance back across it in 1943/44. And anyway I dont think it will effect the Germans that much as they have very high movement rates in general.
Good luck Comrade!
p.s. Requests for rush-buying are to be posted in the "Office of the Economic Minister" thread
__________________
Grenski Timyfovich Sladkov, People's Armaments Commisar of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and winner of the Valient Labor Medal.
Last edited by greeny; March 31, 2003 at 19:00.
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2003, 03:37
|
#3
|
Prince
Local Time: 15:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sunset and the evening star And one clear call for me.
Posts: 784
|
You should make this a poll. In general it is a bad idea to mass pillage the roads, taking out some the ones near Leningrad are the only ones I ever really needed to pillage. Trying to defend Kiev or Minsk in the Summer of 1942 is very VERY risky. Unless we plan to do lots of loading, with is unethical for a demogame
__________________
Sea Kings TOT
Sors salutis/ et virtutis/ michi nunc contraria,/ est affectus/ et defectus/ semper in angaria./
Hac in hora/ sine mora/ corde pulsem tangite;/ quod per sortem/ sternit fortem,/ mecum omnes plangite!
Last edited by EZRhino; April 1, 2003 at 03:48.
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2003, 05:52
|
#4
|
Prince
Local Time: 22:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Kremlin
Posts: 379
|
I agree with EZRhino, we should add reloading to the list of things not allowed. I'm sure we WONT be able to hold Minsk or Kiev. I've never managed it, and those I have heard have done it were using very questioanble tricks like buiding a city on a unmovable fortress and then shipping it to the ciys by frieghter.
__________________
Grenski Timyfovich Sladkov, People's Armaments Commisar of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and winner of the Valient Labor Medal.
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2003, 07:41
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Castellón, Spain
Posts: 3,571
|
so what do i try to do??
i have four cities under my orders I don´t think I'll be able to hold any of them
kiev has a lot of units but if won't last for long, and gomel doesn´t even have a barracks
my main goal will be to slow down the germans as much as possible so Smolensk can have enough units to defend by itself
so, do I just put all the units i have around and try to slow down the germans??
while playing redfront I saw that the ai seems to follow the roads, so if we pillage one road the ai won´t move as many units that direction,
that's why i usually pillage the road
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2003, 10:18
|
#6
|
Prince
Local Time: 23:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 522
|
Attempting to prevent the capture of Kiev would be a waste of reserves - what I usually do is try and hold the city long enough while I pillage the road from Kiev to Gomel and from Kiev to Perekop (roughly 2-3 turns - there are enough troops in Kiev to hold it for that long). I've always found pillaging roads to be a very effective tactic in RF. In most games I've played I usually manage to hold onto Gomel (it helps if you can get some of the Partisans out of the Marshes to reinforce the city).
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2003, 10:29
|
#7
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The European Union, Sweden, Lund
Posts: 3,682
|
Shaka, as the front moves you'll get command of more cities from the marshal. So atleast you won't have to worry about losing your comand
__________________
No Fighting here, this is the war room!
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2003, 12:08
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 23:51
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Castellón, Spain
Posts: 3,571
|
our man,
I'll make a poll to see if people agree with the defense of gomel
henrik,
that helps
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:51.
|
|