April 5, 2003, 15:35
|
#1
|
Settler
Local Time: 15:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5
|
Pop limit
Im sorry, i haven't played this game, but i was wondering what the pop limit was, and how it worked.
|
|
|
|
April 5, 2003, 15:40
|
#2
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Porto Alegre, RS
Posts: 532
|
The pop limit is when your food surplus equals zero... depending on how many terrains are irrigated, if they have or not railroads and what city's improvements you have, it can be almost any number...
There is a limit, of course, but I don't know exactly what it is... Try to imagine a city surrounded by grasslands, RRed, irrigated all over and with all necessary improvements. And democracy, I think, gives a +1 for each tile, or is it just for production?
|
|
|
|
April 6, 2003, 08:25
|
#3
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:11
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 459
|
it gives an bonus... hmmmm but im not sure what max limit is... i think im gonna check thought
__________________
Proud member of the PNY Brigade
Also a proud member of the The Glory Of War team on PtW-DG
A.D 300, after 5h of playing DonHomer said: "looks like civ2 could be a good way to kill time if i can get the hang of it :P"
|
|
|
|
April 6, 2003, 14:09
|
#4
|
Settler
Local Time: 17:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 15
|
A city has 20 squares around it plus the center tile. Assuming all grassland with no resources, that's 40 food. With irrigation, 60 food. With railroads, I THINK it jumps to 80 (the Civpedia doesn't specify the increase given by railroads). Democracy affects commerce and production, not food. I'm not sure what the bonus for the city itself is, but it's probably 1 food at most, so 3 for the city tile. That would be 83 food total, which would support a city of 41 with a surplus of 1 food. That 1 would get annoying as the city would constantly grow to 42 and starve back to 41 unless you play around with the population to get a zero surplus.
The only size 41 city I've seen is the World 2003 scenario's Tokyo, sporting a population of 8.6 million.
|
|
|
|
April 6, 2003, 14:45
|
#5
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 23:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 34
|
A very big flood plain area would be bigger but would not produce much. Flood plain start at 4
|
|
|
|
April 6, 2003, 15:04
|
#6
|
King
Local Time: 15:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: near the magic kingdom
Posts: 1,001
|
Okay, since you guys have asked for the theoretical maximum, the best would be 20 tiles of flood plains with wheat. Flood plains give 3 food, +2 for wheat, +1 for irrigation, +1 for railroads = 7 / floodpains wheat * 20 = 140. +2 for the city tile (never changes) and you get 142 food or size 71 (and a city that has no production).
__________________
badams
|
|
|
|
April 6, 2003, 17:05
|
#7
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Porto Alegre, RS
Posts: 532
|
It would be a pearl to look, though.
|
|
|
|
April 6, 2003, 22:44
|
#8
|
Emperor
Local Time: 16:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,755
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by badams52
+2 for the city tile (never changes) ...
|
Not true, the number is based on the amount of food required by each citizen of your city. If you increase that amount to 3, the quantiity of food produced in the city centre will also be 3.
|
|
|
|
April 6, 2003, 23:53
|
#9
|
King
Local Time: 15:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: near the magic kingdom
Posts: 1,001
|
Okay, if unmodded, +2 never changes
__________________
badams
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2003, 06:46
|
#10
|
Prince
Local Time: 23:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Deaf forever
Posts: 599
|
Taxes.... *drool*
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2003, 08:20
|
#11
|
Warlord
Local Time: 01:11
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Arctic Hill
Posts: 266
|
Of course, with worker dogpiling you can grow the city just as large as you want.
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2003, 09:25
|
#12
|
Deity
Local Time: 16:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Baron of Sealand residing in SF, CA
Posts: 12,344
|
Until it starves itself back down again.
__________________
____________________________
"One day if I do go to heaven, I'm going to do what every San Franciscan does who goes to heaven - I'll look around and say, 'It ain't bad, but it ain't San Francisco.'" - Herb Caen, 1996
"If God, as they say, is homophobic, I wouldn't worship that God." - Archbishop Desmond Tutu
____________________________
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2003, 16:36
|
#13
|
King
Local Time: 18:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Right down the road
Posts: 2,321
|
Worker dogpiling was removed to a major extent in PTW. You can't add workers to a city that is starving anymore. In addition, they capped a city at 255 population.
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2003, 17:11
|
#14
|
King
Local Time: 15:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: May 2002
Location: near the magic kingdom
Posts: 1,001
|
255??? Interesting, since a city with that population can only be gotten through mods.
__________________
badams
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2003, 19:01
|
#15
|
Prince
Local Time: 20:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Porto Alegre, RS
Posts: 532
|
255 population should give a good tax revenue.
|
|
|
|
April 11, 2003, 09:55
|
#16
|
Emperor
Local Time: 20:11
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brasil
Posts: 3,958
|
255 pop would generate a s**tload of pollution.
Edit: I thought the censor would catch that word.
__________________
'Yep, I've been drinking again.'
Last edited by Alex; April 11, 2003 at 13:58.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:11.
|
|