Thread Tools
Old April 9, 2003, 23:49   #31
Urban Ranger
NationStatesApolyton Storywriters' GuildNever Ending Stories
Deity
 
Urban Ranger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 07:25
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 1999
Location: The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
Posts: 14,606
Quote:
Originally posted by Evil_Eric_4
But they may no longer believe that America's only purpose for invading was to conquer, colonize and steal.
Of course not. The US also invades to control and prop up friendly regimes.
__________________
(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Urban Ranger is offline  
Old April 9, 2003, 23:59   #32
Evil_Eric_4
Warlord
 
Local Time: 18:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 101
UR
In the name of national security***gasp***
Imagine that--we are so self-centered

and that quote is from Ned-not me--I dont think anything will ever change the minds of the arabs--its been hard-coded into their brains by their media ,Mullahs and their own governments for too long.
__________________
Die-Bin Laden-die
Evil_Eric_4 is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 00:07   #33
MattyBoy
Prince
 
MattyBoy's Avatar
 
Local Time: 09:25
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pekka Fan Club
Posts: 634
If we take it as a given that US/Britain/Aus were going to fight until they won...

...I would think that both hawks and doves are rejoicing to see such a breakthrough. Hawks would be feeling triumphant and doves would be glad to see the fighting will probably be over much sooner. The only disappointment in seeing the war end sooner could have been from those who supported the Iraqi side and still held out hope for an Iraqi victory.

Why would people want to see more killing for almost certainly the same result?

For me it has been wierd to want to celebrate this victory, while I still feel we* should never have instigated this war.



* I would prefer to have used the word they here, but that would be inaccurate because I'm an Australian citizen.
__________________
"I'm so happy I could go and drive a car crash!"
"What do you mean do I rape strippers too? Is that an insult?"
- Pekka
MattyBoy is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 00:51   #34
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
There is a survey of world opinion posted on the CNN site. They all seem to want the UN to take charge in Iraq to curb American power and influence.

Well, I say to that - let's ask the people of Iraq who they trust more. The USA or the UN.

I think I know the answer to that question. The move to push the UN into a lead role in Iraq is a power grab by the Arab ruling class to "win the peace" and impose a regime in Iraq like their own: oppressive and undemocratic.

Americans to Bush: stand up to the UN one more time.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Ned is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 01:15   #35
nationalist
Warlord
 
nationalist's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 221
Well, I hope that we start devoting our time to rebuilding and democratizing these two conquered countries (Iraq, Afghanistan). If 20 years from now these countries are working democracies with rising standards of living and good levels of human rights, then I think that we have done some good. If we screw things up, things in the ME will get even worse, and we will have just wasted 78 billion dollars. We're coming up to a crossroads. Maybe we can use this to create a Palestinian state and patch up our relationship with the UN and EU, or maybe we'll **** things up royally and create a world even more dangerous and menacing than ever before. We'll just have to wait and see.
__________________
"The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is to have with them as little political connection as possible... It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world, so far as we are now at liberty to do it." George Washington- September 19, 1796
nationalist is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 02:01   #36
gsmoove23
Warlord
 
gsmoove23's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189
The Arab nations don't have any veto rights in the UN and I would be certain the Iraqis would trust the UN more then the US. Right now the only benefit of having the US control the reconstruction is the massive amounts of money that will pour into American comanies through contracts. This may be counterproductive since world opinion is already against us and it will simply feed into the arguement that the war was started out of self-interest.
gsmoove23 is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 02:03   #37
Ming
lifer
Civilization II MultiplayerCivilization III MultiplayerPolyCast TeamCivilization IV: MultiplayerApolytoners Hall of Fame
Retired
 
Ming's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Mingapulco - CST
Posts: 30,317
It should get interesting... I'm sure all of the arab neighbors are praying to their gods that a strong, democratic country doesn't rise from the ashes... It will put a lot of preasure on their own rule if it does
__________________
Keep on Civin'
Civ V Civilization V Civ5 CivV Civilization 5 Civ 5 - Do your part!
Ming is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 02:36   #38
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
gsmove32, the Iraqi opposition has stated many times that the new regime will remember those who helped it and those who did not.

If the Iraqi people have any say in this, they will avoid UN control as they will no longer be able to discriminate against collaborators and supporter their former oppressors. In fact, the new government probably will have very cool relations with a number of pro-Saddam Arab regimes.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Ned is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 02:38   #39
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
News from CNN, Saddam paid al Jazeera.

This may be why al Jazeera suddenly began broadcasting the truth once Saddam and Baghdad Bob were no longer in charge.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Ned is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 02:52   #40
gsmoove23
Warlord
 
gsmoove23's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189
Ned, the Iraqi opposition is on the payroll of the US government. I thought by Iraqi people you meant the people that have actually lived there. They have no reason to trust American intentions. Great you "liberated" us, can you go now?

CNN story link?
gsmoove23 is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 03:33   #41
TheStinger
Civilization III Democracy Game
King
 
TheStinger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:25
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: International crime fighting playboy
Posts: 1,063
The BBC reported from Jordan last night and boy were those arabs gutted. They couldn't believe that people were trashing poor little Saddams statues. They really did believe he was some sort of Arab saviour. They must be wondering what happened to the info minister
__________________
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
TheStinger is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 03:41   #42
Tattila the Hun
King
 
Tattila the Hun's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:25
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tornio, Suomi Perkele!
Posts: 2,653
Isn't it nice how Rumsfeld catecorizes Saddam with the likes of Hitler, Stalin, Lenin , Ceaucescu... Brutal dictator have-beens...

Learn history, dammit!

Lenin was a philosopher, and the bugger died in 19..23, I think, before **** hit the fan...
__________________
I've allways wanted to play "Russ Meyer's Civilization"
Tattila the Hun is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 03:43   #43
DinoDoc
Civilization II Democracy GameApolytoners Hall of Fame
Deity
 
DinoDoc's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Underwater no one can hear sharks scream
Posts: 11,096
Quote:
Originally posted by Tattila the Hun
Learn history, dammit!

Lenin was a philosopher, and the bugger died in 19..23, I think, before **** hit the fan...
You're telling other people to learn history with this rose colored view of Lenin!
DinoDoc is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 03:47   #44
TheStinger
Civilization III Democracy Game
King
 
TheStinger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:25
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: International crime fighting playboy
Posts: 1,063
Lenin wasn't in the same league as Stalin or Hitler. To Rummsie though all commies are are the same I suppose
__________________
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
TheStinger is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 03:58   #45
tandeetaylor
Chieftain
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by Ned
al jazeera is broadcasting the events without too much bias. This in itself is a major event.
As a speaker of Arabic, I'm sure you are a regular viewer of Al-Jazeera. I haven't watched Al-Jazeera much during the war, but I have to say, when I did watch it a lot a couple years ago, I saw more interviews with Israelies than I do on American news.
__________________
If playground rules don't apply, this is anarchy! -Kelso
tandeetaylor is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 04:17   #46
Tattila the Hun
King
 
Tattila the Hun's Avatar
 
Local Time: 02:25
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tornio, Suomi Perkele!
Posts: 2,653
Rose colored?

Lenin might have been the creator of Soviet Union, source of many evils, but his goals were good, and it's just plain wrong to bunch him with brutal murderers. Why not Marx, then?
__________________
I've allways wanted to play "Russ Meyer's Civilization"
Tattila the Hun is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 06:16   #47
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
Gsmoove, I saw it on the banner while watching CNN. I have not seen it on their site.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Ned is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 06:26   #48
Jack the Bodiless
King
 
Jack the Bodiless's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Converted underground reservoir tank.
Posts: 1,345
Lenin was directly responsible for quite a lot of post-revolution terror. Robespierre is perhaps the closest comparison.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 06:27   #49
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
FOX correspondent in Amman said the majority were shocked. A minority were in disbelief - thinking that the events were filmed in Hollywood. Another minority were hopeful that the people of Iraq would now know peace.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Ned is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 06:29   #50
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
I wonder how many other Arab countries kept the events in Baghdad from their people? The speculation among the media folks is that Syria kept the news from the people because Assad feared an uprising.
__________________
http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en
Ned is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 07:23   #51
GeneralTacticus
Alpha Centauri Democracy GameAlpha Centauri PBEMPtWDG RoleplayNationStatesInterSite Democracy Game: Apolyton TeamCivilization III PBEMApolyton Storywriters' GuildACDG3 Spartans
Emperor
 
GeneralTacticus's Avatar
 
Local Time: 10:25
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: of Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,851
Quote:
Isn't it nice how Rumsfeld catecorizes Saddam with the likes of Hitler, Stalin, Lenin , Ceaucescu... Brutal dictator have-beens...
Interesting that he ommitted Pol Pot, Suharto and various Latin American mass murderers as well.
GeneralTacticus is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 07:26   #52
mark13
ACDG The Free Drones
King
 
mark13's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 2,128
Ned,

Don't know where you got your info that the BBC cut away from the statue toppling. I was watching BBC1 yesterday afternoon (that's the main BBC channel - not a news channel - and they had a special news report) that covered the toppling of the statue for a full hour, with a virtually hysterical commentator (reported in Iraq for many years, never seen anything like it etc.) in the background.

I'm pro-war, and I've been very impressed with the BBC coverage overall.
mark13 is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 08:37   #53
TheStinger
Civilization III Democracy Game
King
 
TheStinger's Avatar
 
Local Time: 00:25
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: International crime fighting playboy
Posts: 1,063
The other thing I have realised about Rumsies satement is tHat Stalin whilst a very nast man could hardly be described as a "failed" dictator, he is the most succesful dictator of all time
__________________
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
TheStinger is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 08:42   #54
rah
lifer
Apolytoners Hall of FameCivilization IV: Multiplayer
Just another peon
 
rah's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: who killed Poly
Posts: 22,919
Article from the Chicago Tribune this morning.
Slightly biased but not overly so.


Swift victory sends shock wave across Middle East

By Deborah Horan and Steve Franklin, Tribune staff reporters. Deborah Horan reported from Cairo and Stephen Franklin from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Tribune foreign correspondent Christine Spolar in Gaza C
Published April 10, 2003

CAIRO -- The news spread quickly by word of mouth Wednesday on the clogged side streets of Cairo where Ramzy Shaaban parked his cab: Saddam Hussein had lost control of Baghdad after just a few days of battle.

"I didn't believe it," said the 38-year-old driver, until he found a television in a nearby cafe. There, he watched in dismay as Iraqis celebrated and cheered American troops.

"I was shocked," said Shaaban, describing the experience from the inside of his cab hours later. "I didn't think Baghdad would fall that easily."

Across the Arab world, news of the collapse of Hussein's regime in Baghdad was met with similar despair and disbelief that the cradle of Arab civilization could surrender so fast.

While some Arabs rejoiced over the regime's demise, many worried that the U.S. would take its struggle elsewhere in the Middle East. Some predicted that the American takeover of Iraq's day-to-day governance would fuel hatred of the U.S. They foresaw more protests and possibly acts of violence against the U.S. and its allies.

Mostly, Arabs expressed a profound sense of humiliation at the Americans' apparent ease in reaching the heart of Baghdad--in contrast to the stiff fighting in Basra, Nasariyah and other cities.

"I thought Baghdad would be hell in battle, but there was no battle," said Nouran el-Gemeay, a 24-year-old student at Cairo University. "Where was the Iraqi resistance that we saw in the other cities?"

Many could not accept the scenes of Iraqis welcoming the American forces. Welcoming the demise of Hussein's government was understandable. But clapping for U.S. soldiers? They searched for other explanations.

"I think that the Americans paid them to act like that for the cameras," said Rula Mawad, a housewife in central Damascus.

Others said the celebrations were not directed at the Americans.

"Iraqis are tired of war," said Abdullah Al-Ashaal, a political analyst at Cairo University. "They are happy because there will be no more bombing, not because of the Americans."

Welcome news to some

To be sure, some Arabs welcomed the absence of strong Iraqi resistance. That was particularly true in Kuwait and in Saudi Arabia.

In Kuwait, Sami al Nsif, a spokesman for the nation's foreign minister, looked forward to jubilant street celebrations for the successful U.S.-led effort.

"It's a joy," al Nsif said. "People are glad that it finished quickly and without much bloodshed. Now, we will be looking for what happened to the 600 prisoners of war who were taken years ago by the Iraqis."

Jamal Kashkoggi, editor of al Watan, a popular newspaper based in Abha, Saudi Arabia, said he was in a "state of ecstasy"

"I love the sense of freedom," Kashkoggi said. "It's freedom for the Iraqis. Whether it's from American or Martian invaders, all the Iraqis have to do now is build their freedoms."

But like many, Kashkoggi expected the takeover of Baghdad to stir worries among Arab leaders. "The Syrians will be nervous," he said.

Until the news of the regime's collapse in Baghdad, the editors at Okaz, a Saudi newspaper, had settled on a front-page headline that read: "America threatens Syria."

"The U.S. already has a legitimate cover [for fighting], so who's next?" asked Faheem al Hamid, the newspaper's executive managing editor.

Other worries voiced in the Middle East included suspicion that the United States was after Iraq's oil, that it intended to stay in Baghdad indefinitely, and that the military government it planned to set up would be friendly to Israel at the expense of the Palestinians. They saw America's professed plans to bring democracy to Iraq as a ploy to consolidate its interests in the region to the detriment of the Arabs.

"People say it is a war for Israel," said Hassan Nafaa, another political analyst at Cairo University. "This is a war for oil. The U.S. wants a pro-American government in Iraq whether it is democratic or not."

Shocked by sudden defeat

Palestinians, in particular, expressed a searing sense of defeat as they watched Iraqi resistance crumble.

"I couldn't image that the Iraqis would do this," said Ranya Abdul Hamwed, a fashionably dressed woman hailing a cab in Gaza City. "No dignity. No morals.

"If they [had overthrown Hussein] without American interference, with an intifada or an assassination, that would be better for them than a surrender and defeat to the Americans," said the 27-year-old teacher.

Many Palestinians had viewed Iraqi resistance through the prism of their own struggle against Israel, so Iraq's defeat became theirs.

"Oh, man. Just once we want to take victory," said Noman Ashour, 47, as he watched television footage of an Iraqi man smacking a poster of Hussein with a shoe.

"All our lives, we've been defeated. Is it right that we do not deserve life? Is it right that this is the end of everyone who carried principles and values?" he asked.

Did he mean Hussein was a man of values? "I'm not talking about Saddam. I'm talking about the people of Iraq. They prefer Roquefort cheese rather than their homeland."

The sense of despair in Gaza City ran deep, and spurred cynicism over what Palestinians see as Arab acquiescence in the face of U.S. military might.

"I wouldn't be surprised if the Americans would ask us to change the Koran," said Samir Abu Shahla, a businessman in Gaza, watching television in a small insurance company.

"Maybe the Arabs will protest a little," Abu Shahla said. "But at the end, they'll be good friends and change the Koran to what the Americans and Jews want. Why not?"
__________________
The OT at APOLYTON is like watching the Special Olympics. Certain people try so hard to debate despite their handicaps.
rah is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 08:46   #55
Worthingtons
Prince
 
Local Time: 23:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pride Park,Derby
Posts: 393
Yes, Very True Stinger, We might not be speakin German without him, but the shape of Europe would sure as hell be somewhat different.
__________________
Up The Millers
Worthingtons is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 09:33   #56
gunkulator
Prince
 
gunkulator's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 434
Quote:
Originally posted by Tattila the Hun
Lenin might have been the creator of Soviet Union, source of many evils, but his goals were good, and it's just plain wrong to bunch him with brutal murderers. Why not Marx, then?
Well, this site puts both Saddam Hussein and Lenin in the category of Secondary Level of Mass Murderers. There are numerous reference sources highlighted for those who wish to dig deeper. So lumping Saddam and Lenin in with Stalin and Hitler may not be completely accurate, it's really a matter of degree, not of kind.
gunkulator is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 09:35   #57
gunkulator
Prince
 
gunkulator's Avatar
 
Local Time: 18:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 434
dp
gunkulator is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 11:25   #58
Ned
King
 
Ned's Avatar
 
Local Time: 15:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: of Aptos, CA
Posts: 2,596
Quote:
Originally posted by mark13
Ned,

Don't know where you got your info that the BBC cut away from the statue toppling. I was watching BBC1 yesterday afternoon (that's the main BBC channel - not a news channel - and they had a special news report) that covered the toppling of the statue for a full hour, with a virtually hysterical commentator (reported in Iraq for many years, never seen anything like it etc.) in the background.

I'm pro-war, and I've been very impressed with the BBC coverage overall.
I heard it several times on FOX. They even quoted an editorial that was very much anti-war as the BBC's reaction to the events.

Do we see something different in the US than what you may see where you are? I know CNN has several editions depending on location.
Ned is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 11:30   #59
mark13
ACDG The Free Drones
King
 
mark13's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 2,128
Well, I don't know - but given Fox's track record I'm always sceptical of absolutely anything that's broadcast on that channel.

But certainly in this country (the UK), yesterday, at about 3pm, when the statue came down, they did a live simulcast with the main BBC channel (BBC1 - they interrupted the usual schedule) and the BBC News 24 channel, for at least an hour (may even have been as long as an hour and a half). They also had at least 2 of the main 5 radio stations that broadcast it live.

As I say - in any case, in a straight fight between FOX and the BBC, I know who's word I'd take.
mark13 is offline  
Old April 10, 2003, 11:33   #60
gsmoove23
Warlord
 
gsmoove23's Avatar
 
Local Time: 23:25
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 189
That Chicago Tribune article was one of the best I've seen.

One things for certain, pariah dictators all over the world are reconsidering the use of wide imperial avenues in their capitols and looking to Jenin or Gaza City for their models. Seriously, what was he thinking, did he make any attempt to block those roads?
gsmoove23 is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:25.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Apolyton Civilization Site | Copyright © The Apolyton Team