April 15, 2003, 12:26
|
#1
|
Settler
Local Time: 23:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 26
|
Different UU for English
I think England gets cheated with that UU. For a huge chuck of the modern age they were the dominant empire on the planet. That unit just doesn't do them justice.
I'm thinking an replacement to the Musketman would be better. The British Regular or "Redcoat" unit would be a lot more useful. During the height of their empire the British Regulars were the elite fighting force of the world. I'm not sure what the best combination of traits would be best thoough. Maybe a +1 on both offense and defense OR +2 offense and same defense...
Anyone?
|
|
|
|
April 15, 2003, 13:14
|
#2
|
Local Time: 01:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: jihadding against Danish Feta
Posts: 6,182
|
I play modded rules where the age of sail begins much sooner, namely with the Navigation tech, and where ships are much faster. The English UU can be interetsing in this meaning, for it can secure the expansion to unsettled islands, and is a kind of very mobile catapult.
|
|
|
|
April 16, 2003, 17:50
|
#3
|
Emperor
Local Time: 01:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 3,218
|
If you ask me, both 4/4/1 and 3/5/1 could be OK.
|
|
|
|
April 25, 2003, 10:53
|
#4
|
Warlord
Local Time: 00:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 217
|
I'm not so sure - having a late golden age can really turn the tables when you're behind. Getting it at gunpowder isn't that much earlier, true, but it coincides nicely with the over ocean trade era - which is what the British empire was all about.
Also, the British Army was extremely small and (at the time of the Napoleonic wars) was only about 50% English - if you count the Indian sepoy battalions too, it's only about 10% English! The reason they won a lot of battles was not so much superior ability as better discipline and command and control. Without the right leaders they often got a right kicking.
I agree, the man-o-war is a naff Civ unit - but it does the job.
__________________
Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
"The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84
|
|
|
|
April 25, 2003, 11:36
|
#5
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Having tea with the Third Man...
Posts: 6,169
|
Well, I think the use of the longbow originated with the English, but that's already a unit. I think the MOW is mostly meant to represent their traditional strength at sea. The main problem is that sea units just aren't as valuable as land units, and come much later, as many have mentioned. I do think that the Viking civ added by the expansion pack should have used a "longboat" unit instead of the galley, which would actually be useful because of its early appearance, but what equivalent could the Brits use? Coracles? Rather silly for a unique unit IMO. You could probably balance it by making the MOW a lot stronger, but I think the basic game mechanics need more fixing than the specifics. Not that that's an original comment by any means...
__________________
"May I be forgiven for the ills that I have done/Friends I have forsaken and strangers I have shunned/Sins I have committed, for which others had to pay/And I haven't met the whiskey that can wash those stains away."
-Brady's Leap, "Wash."
|
|
|
|
April 25, 2003, 13:15
|
#6
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
Eliminating the useless ironclad and strengthening the MOW would do more to improve the English than anything else.
I always thought the Greeks should have a Trireme instead of a Hoplite.
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
April 25, 2003, 17:58
|
#7
|
Settler
Local Time: 23:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1
|
I'm thinking maybe a tank UU as they did have some of the first tanks. How bout it of course those were WW1 tanks and the tanks now are WW2.
|
|
|
|
April 25, 2003, 21:05
|
#8
|
Warlord
Local Time: 05:14
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Kathmandu
Posts: 261
|
The Gurkhas of course... thats what the English special unit should be... but then again I am from Nepal...
__________________
Without music life would be a mistake - Nietzsche
So you think you can tell heaven from hell?
rocking on everest
|
|
|
|
April 25, 2003, 22:14
|
#9
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The First State
Posts: 446
|
I think the English UU is a good idea, but ships need improvements.
I would move Ironclads to Industrialization or Corporation, giving the more accurate life of Wooden Frigates.
I would make the ships changed to:
Galley 30 1.1.3 (2)
Caravel 40 1.2.3 (3)
Galleon 60 1.2.4 (4)
Privateer 60 3.1.3
Frigate 60 4.3.4 (0) 6.1.2
-Man-O-War 60 5.3.4 (0) 8.1.2
Ironclad 80 8.8.4 (0) 8.1.2
Transport 100 1.4.5 (8)
Destroyer 120 16.12.6 (0) 10.1.3
Battleship 200 24.20.4 (0) 14.2.4
Submarine 100 15.8.3
Nuclear Sub 120 15.8.4
Aegis Cruiser 160 16.15.5 (0) 7.2.2
Carrier 200 1.9.4 (8 Aircraft)
I don't think the Hopilite is a bad choice for Greece
If it was Athens (S,C), they would have the Trireme
And Sparta (M,I) would have the Hoplite
But since they are together, it isn't a big deal
__________________
Viva la Spam
|
|
|
|
April 25, 2003, 23:45
|
#10
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
They couldn't have a trireme, because its advantage would have to be a 2 on attack (maybe a 2 on defense instead... not likely though), which would make it competitive even two eras later - not a good idea.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2003, 12:10
|
#11
|
Prince
Local Time: 23:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Casnewydd, Cymru
Posts: 372
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Elok
Well, I think the use of the longbow originated with the English,
|
It was the Welsh.
I like to use the editor and have a few different UUs for every Civ.
Challanger 2 tank, anybody?
__________________
-Sir T
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2003, 15:57
|
#12
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by skywalker
They couldn't have a trireme, because its advantage would have to be a 2 on attack (maybe a 2 on defense instead... not likely though), which would make it competitive even two eras later - not a good idea.
|
Perhaps the whole naval thing could be rejigged. I've always thought that the ships were too slow.
And triremes are so cool.
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2003, 19:49
|
#13
|
Emperor
Local Time: 19:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Having tea with the Third Man...
Posts: 6,169
|
Well, the moment they have a Welsh civ I'll eat my words, then.
__________________
"May I be forgiven for the ills that I have done/Friends I have forsaken and strangers I have shunned/Sins I have committed, for which others had to pay/And I haven't met the whiskey that can wash those stains away."
-Brady's Leap, "Wash."
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2003, 23:57
|
#14
|
Chieftain
Local Time: 15:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: GMT -8
Posts: 51
|
I play a mod called the ArtilleryMod, which gives the English the longbowman and adds a new unit, the crossbowman. The stats are 5/1/1 for the long and 4/1/1 for the cross, and the long is a deadend unit.
__________________
I wish for a custom avatar - it would give me some individuality.
I am a dissenter of the required first/last name fields.
|
|
|
|
April 27, 2003, 07:10
|
#15
|
Warlord
Local Time: 23:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 219
|
When I first started with Civ3, I liked playing the English natch but soon realised that their UU was the biggest waste of space ever.
Some of the above suggestions for its replacement are interesting.
Gotta wonder if the testers ever tried playing with the English and actually reported back that the MOW was a useful unit...?
|
|
|
|
April 27, 2003, 13:01
|
#16
|
Prince
Local Time: 00:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 366
|
The problem as I see it is that since it is 'England', UUs like a 'redcoat' aren't applicable because they were British, not English. Presumably this is also why Elizabeth is Monarch rather than Victoria.
|
|
|
|
April 27, 2003, 13:12
|
#17
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
I think the distinction is minor. In terms of the niche they're supposed to fill, they're British.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
April 27, 2003, 13:38
|
#18
|
Warlord
Local Time: 00:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 217
|
Getting back to the UU heart of the thread - most colonizing nations had "ships of the line" at the time of the MoW. The biggest of these wasn`t English (Spanish, I believe). Here's my most recent idea for a new UU...
Whatever else happens, we have got
the Maxim gun
and they have not
How's about a Maxim gunner, not conscriptable, usual 1 movement, expensive but good defense? Kind of regular infantry but not requiring rubber. It's just an idea - feedback?
__________________
Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
"The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84
|
|
|
|
April 27, 2003, 13:39
|
#19
|
Deity
Local Time: 19:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,822
|
How about, instead of a UU, some sort of unique improvement that reduces corruption, allowing a larger empire? Or a second FP sort of thing.
__________________
[Obama] is either a troll or has no ****ing clue how government works - GePap
Later amendments to the Constitution don't supersede earlier amendments - GePap
|
|
|
|
April 28, 2003, 07:26
|
#20
|
King
Local Time: 00:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: International crime fighting playboy
Posts: 1,063
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Rogan Josh
The problem as I see it is that since it is 'England', UUs like a 'redcoat' aren't applicable because they were British, not English. Presumably this is also why Elizabeth is Monarch rather than Victoria.
|
Vicky isn't the leader because hse didn't have any power, by the 19th century the monarch was just a figurehead.
As for the UU I play a mod sometimes where everyone gets the MOW and the english get the ironclad exclusively.
Another idea would eb to give them a dreadnought uu but teh battleship is already quite good so you would have to reduce its values.
__________________
Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
Douglas Adams (Influential author)
|
|
|
|
April 29, 2003, 09:54
|
#21
|
Emperor
Local Time: 08:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wal supports the CPA
Posts: 3,948
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Elok
Well, the moment they have a Welsh civ I'll eat my words, then.
|
The Celts?
Seriously, endless fun could be made of a Welsh civ. Imagine how long their city names would be when they've got a place called "Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllandysilio gogogoch".
Its true.
See
__________________
Only feebs vote.
|
|
|
|
April 30, 2003, 02:15
|
#22
|
King
Local Time: 09:44
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,433
|
Historical Aside.
The Royal Navy's ships of the line (Man-O-War) during the 18th and early 19th centuries were virtually identical to every other major power's ships of the line. A significant difference was in gunnery training. The Royal Navy generally trained their gun crews using live amunition, whereas other nations only did mock firing drills and expected their crews to learn the rest when the cannonballs started flying.
This resulted in British ships being able to fire around twice as fast as foreign ships. At Trafalgar, Nelson's fleet was outnumbered by the French and Spanish (27 british vs 39 french and spanish (6 were frigates)). Superior leaderships and gunnery tipped the odds.
As to the English UU, I believe it should be the privateer. Although, this would give the English near total domination of the oceans until the advent of frigates This is kind of accurate since frigates were the ship of choice for hunting pirates.
__________________
There's no game in The Sims. It's not a game. It's like watching a tank of goldfishes and feed them occasionally. - Urban Ranger
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2003, 13:55
|
#23
|
Prince
Local Time: 18:44
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 434
|
Besides a superior navy, it was highly disciplined infantry that made England a force to be reckoned with. Either Musketman or Rifleman should be England's UU. +1/+1 or +0/+2 for att/def over the base unit.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:44.
|
|