 |
View Poll Results: Do you agree to this amendment?
|
|
|
Yes
|
   
|
6 |
85.71% |
|
No
|
  
|
1 |
14.29% |
|
abstain
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
April 21, 2003, 11:23
|
#1
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 01:01
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 848
|
AMENDMENT: Increasing the nomination period
Pedrunn has suggested this one two weeks ago and it failed because of the then valid quorum. I'm also adding a word to make the meaning clearer - the nomination has to be done by oneself.
Change:
"At the start of the election process, the Court must start a nomination thread. All citizens who wish to be candidates for an office must publicly express their nomination in this thread. For this they have three days."
to new:
"At the start of the election process, the Court must start a nomination thread. All citizens who wish to be candidates for an office must themselves publicly express their nomination in this thread. For this they have five days."
This amendment needs 7 votes in favour and more in favour than against in order to pass. The poll will be open till April 26th 1630GMT.
|
|
|
|
|
April 21, 2003, 12:53
|
#2
|
|
Super Moderator
Local Time: 02:01
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 6,206
|
This one is clear and I aggree to both little changes. The first word is a clarification, but it is always better if noone has to guess and the second one does make sense as we can see.
-Martin
__________________
Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 24, 2003, 04:02
|
#3
|
|
King
Local Time: 01:01
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: aachen, germany
Posts: 1,100
|
why 5? if we change it lets make it 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 24, 2003, 04:15
|
#4
|
|
King
Local Time: 01:01
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: France
Posts: 1,986
|
I voted no.
And before people are starting to  at me, I shortly explain why:
1.) Will it increase the number of nominations? Doubtfull
2.) Will it change anything for the problem we are having? Doubtfull
I know it sounds to pessimistic, but I don't think that changing the period will change the outcome............
Plus as Zaphod mentioned, then we should make it one week/7days........
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2003, 12:14
|
#5
|
|
Super Moderator
Local Time: 02:01
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Posts: 6,206
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Gilgamensch
I voted no.
And before people are starting to at me, I shortly explain why:
|
Well it is no problem if you don't share the opinion of the others, you have the right on free speech.
Unfortunatly this AMENDMENT failed, not because of more No then Yes Votes, but because of the lack of voters. 
-Martin
__________________
Civ2 military advisor: "No complaints, Sir!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2003, 14:08
|
#6
|
|
Prince
Local Time: 01:01
Local Date: November 2, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 848
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Martin Gühmann
Unfortunatly this AMENDMENT failed, not because of more No then Yes Votes, but because of the lack of voters.
-Martin
|
Unfortunately Poly was down for 2 days of the voting period! Anyone going to put it up again? Pedrunn? (not me again)
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2003, 15:04
|
#7
|
|
King
Local Time: 21:01
Local Date: November 1, 2010
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: of Natal, Brazil
Posts: 2,555
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by mapfi
Unfortunately Poly was down for 2 days of the voting period! Anyone going to put it up again? Pedrunn? (not me again)
|
We cant get this working can we.  Zaphod is trying a third time here 
__________________
"Kill a man and you are a murder.
Kill thousands and you are a conquer.
Kill all and you are a God!"
-Jean Rostand
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:01.
|
|
